First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 19.8x earnings — a 70% discount to the sector average of 65.0x — FSLR is in the lower valuation range. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 5.3 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). DCF fair value of $131 implies 35% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedFirst Solar exhibits a distinct divergence between its high-quality earnings generation and capital efficiency, characterized by robust profitability metrics that mask underlying value creation challenges. The DuPont decomposition reveals an ROE of 16.0% driven primarily by exceptional net margins at 29.3%, rather than asset turnover or leverage, which sits at moderate levels with a multiplier of 1.40x and low turnover of 0.39x. Despite strong financial health indicators including a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, an Altman Z-Score of 5.2 suggesting safe insolvency distances, and a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.52 indicating high earnings authenticity, the firm's capital allocation is constrained by a ROIC-WACC spread of -3.1%, where returns on invested capital fall short of the required cost of equity at 14.7% versus an ROIC of only 11.6%.
Valuation metrics present a significant discrepancy between current market pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flow models. Trading at a P/E multiple of 13.7x, which is substantially lower than the sector average of 57.8x, the stock appears deeply undervalued relative to peers despite its superior margin profile. However, DCF analysis implies a fair value that suggests -34.9% downside from current levels, contingent on an assumed ten-year free cash flow growth rate of just 12.0%. This compression in valuation multiples may reflect market skepticism regarding the sustainability of such high margins or concerns embedded within the implied low-growth trajectory required to justify the DCF output.
Risk factors and factor-based returns further complicate the investment thesis, highlighting a tension between momentum signals and fundamental deterioration trends. While the stock has generated substantial Fama-French alpha annually at 35.15%, recent data points suggest an erosion in core profitability drivers with a Profitability Factor (RMW) of -0.820 and a Growth tilt that conflicts with its value-like valuation, evidenced by a Value Factor (HML) of -0.671. Compounding these fundamental headwinds, insider activity over the last 90 days shows net selling totaling $14,921,853, creating a cautionary signal regarding management's view on near-term prospects despite the company's strong balance sheet and clean earnings quality scores.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 24% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 12.5% | 14.5% | 16.5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $145 | $125 | $111 |
| 3% | $154 | $131 | $115 |
| 4% | $164 | $137 | $119 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $311.01.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=14.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $131 (-34.8%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 24% above its 5-year average P/E of 11.6x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedFirst Solar, Inc. is currently trading at $248.88 within the technology sector, presenting a snapshot where price action relative to moving averages and short-term momentum indicators offers specific context for analysis. Without access to precise historical data points required to calculate exact average values or current Relative Strength Index readings, any definitive statement regarding whether the stock sits above or below its key trend lines remains speculative based solely on the provided figures. The absence of these critical comparative metrics prevents a clear determination of the prevailing directional bias or the specific state of short-term momentum that RSI typically illuminates. Consequently, while the current price level is established at $248.88, the broader technical narrative regarding trend strength and potential overbought or oversold conditions cannot be fully synthesized without additional historical performance data to validate these relationships against moving averages. In a vacuum of specific indicator values, the market structure for this asset remains undefined in terms of immediate momentum shifts or long-term trend alignment. The current price point serves only as an anchor, lacking the necessary velocity and comparative context to confirm if buyers are aggressively driving the stock higher above its support levels or if sellers are exerting pressure below established averages. Investors analyzing this setup would need to cross-reference the $248.88 figure with recent closing prices for moving averages to ascertain trend direction and consult oscillators like RSI to gauge the intensity of recent price movements relative to historical norms. Until such data is integrated, the technical picture remains incomplete regarding
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XSD or VBK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell FSLR shares regardless of First Solar, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.4B of passive capital is structurally linked to FSLR through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in First Solar, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NVIDIA CORP (NVDA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with FSLR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 29 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
FSLR Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 FSLR shares, reducing daily market volatility.
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.0% of the XSD (XSD) and 0.3% of the VBK (VBK). Across 29 tracked ETFs, approximately 17M shares (15.6% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest FSLR Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 29 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
FSLR Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for First Solar, Inc. over the past year sits near $193.43 (11% of 252-day volume). The current price of $311.01 trades 60.8% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
FSLR Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does First Solar, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
First Solar, Inc. converts 55% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.9%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 452 | $234.60 | $106,039.2 |
| 2026-05-12 | 18,780 | $233.27 | $4.4M |
| 2026-05-11 | 137 | $219.95 | $30,133.15 |
| 2026-05-06 | 27,583 | $219.38 | $6.1M |
| 2026-05-04 | 4,369 | $211.71 | $924,960.99 |
| 2026-05-01 | 20 | $201.89 | $4,037.8 |
| 2026-04-29 | 2 | $195.86 | $391.72 |
| 2026-04-27 | 3 | $193.76 | $581.28 |
| 2026-04-24 | 1,733 | $196.19 | $339,997.27 |
| 2026-04-20 | 64 | $190.44 | $12,188.16 |
| 2026-04-13 | 500 | $203.47 | $101,735 |
| 2026-04-07 | 13 | $195.57 | $2,542.41 |
| 2026-04-06 | 12 | $195.32 | $2,343.84 |
| 2026-04-02 | 10 | $199.42 | $1,994.2 |
| 2026-03-31 | 1 | $184.70 | $184.7 |
| 2026-03-25 | 11 | $192.85 | $2,121.35 |
| 2026-03-20 | 1 | $199.65 | $199.65 |
| 2026-03-18 | 37 | $200.42 | $7,415.54 |
| 2026-03-16 | 2,800 | $196.07 | $548,996 |
| 2026-03-13 | 70 | $197.56 | $13,829.2 |
| 2026-03-11 | 726 | $197.80 | $143,602.8 |
| 2026-03-06 | 4,210 | $191.80 | $807,478 |
| 2026-03-02 | 23,544 | $197.20 | $4.6M |
| 2026-02-26 | 1,012 | $210.12 | $212,641.44 |
| 2026-02-18 | 62 | $226.05 | $14,015.1 |
| 2026-02-17 | 4,694 | $225.65 | $1.1M |
| 2026-02-12 | 23 | $227.74 | $5,238.02 |
| 2026-02-11 | 22,700 | $226.24 | $5.1M |
| 2026-02-10 | 2 | $222.13 | $444.26 |
| 2026-02-02 | 3 | $225.52 | $676.56 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| NXT | 0.533 | 0.518 | Moderate |
| EME | 0.374 | 0.425 | Moderate |
| ENPH | 0.337 | 0.258 | Moderate |
| TSM | 0.325 | 0.352 | Moderate |
| AAOI | 0.323 | 0.334 | Moderate |
| SWK | 0.322 | 0.294 | Moderate |
| CALX | 0.318 | 0.305 | Moderate |
| NRG | 0.317 | 0.322 | Moderate |
| NEE | 0.317 | 0.271 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare FSLR to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.