ONEO(ONEO)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe ONEO ETF currently presents a unique structural anomaly with zero reported assets under management, rendering traditional performance metrics and liquidity analysis inapplicable. Despite this lack of scale, the fund's disclosed holdings reveal a distinct tilt toward technology and industrials, which collectively account for nearly 30% of the portfolio weight based on available data points. The top ten positions are heavily concentrated within the semiconductor and hardware sectors, with companies like Western Digital, Micron, and Lam Research comprising significant portions of the reported exposure. This concentration suggests a thematic focus on physical infrastructure and manufacturing rather than broad market diversification or financial services dominance.
Geographically and sectorally, the fund exhibits an uneven distribution where technology leads at 16%, followed by industrials at 12.5% and consumer cyclical stocks at 8%. The inclusion of energy names such as Devon Energy and FTI Technologies alongside healthcare providers like McKesson indicates a strategy that spans multiple economic cycles rather than adhering to a single industry vertical. However, the extremely low allocation percentages for individual top holdings—ranging from roughly 0.6% to 1.9%—create an impression of extreme fragmentation when viewed in isolation, yet this must be contextualized against the fund's negligible total size. Without meaningful capital inflows or outflows data, it remains unclear whether these weightings represent a deliberate micro-cap strategy or simply vesting artifacts within a dormant vehicle.
Ultimately, the quantitative profile of ONEO reflects a speculative composition that lacks the depth required for standard risk-adjusted return analysis due to its absence from major market indices and trading venues. The sector breakdown highlights an over-representation in hard technology sectors relative to financials and utilities, while the minuscule AUM figure underscores significant liquidity risks for potential participants. Investors examining this instrument would need to verify whether these holdings are actively managed or passive exposures within a framework that has effectively ceased operations or failed to attract capital necessary to sustain its stated investment thesis.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 04:28:09.93747+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 45/100The investment theme implied by the ticker ONEO suggests a narrow focus on one or more specific sectors, yet the actual portfolio displays significant thematic dilution. While technology holdings are prominent among the top positions with companies like Western Digital and Micron present, the inclusion of major energy producers such as Devon Energy and Marathon Petroleum alongside healthcare firms like McKesson indicates a lack of sector exclusivity typical of pure-play thematic funds. The presence of financial services and consumer staples further broadens the scope beyond any singular technological or industrial narrative. Furthermore, the relatively low individual weights assigned to even these top holdings suggest that the fund may be utilizing broad market names primarily for stability rather than maintaining an aggressive concentration in a specific innovation theme.
Sector coherence is challenged by the distribution of assets across eleven distinct categories, with technology representing only 15.8% of the total portfolio despite appearing frequently in the largest positions. The substantial allocation to industrials and consumer cyclicals further distances this fund from the concentrated exposure usually associated with specialized thematic strategies. With a top-ten concentration of just 9.2%, the portfolio exhibits characteristics more aligned with a diversified broad-market index than a focused thematic vehicle, effectively neutralizing potential outperformance in specific growth sectors while exposing investors to wide-ranging market risks. The data reflects a structure designed for general diversification rather than targeted exposure to a single economic driver or industry trend.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 23:20:54.722409+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe ONEO ETF exhibits a sector profile that diverges significantly from traditional broad-market benchmarks, characterized by a pronounced tilt toward growth-oriented industries while maintaining substantial exposure to cyclical sectors. Technology and Industrials collectively account for nearly 28% of the portfolio, with Technology alone representing over fifteen percent despite holding only ninety-four positions relative to other categories. This weighting suggests an investment thesis centered on innovation-driven revenue streams and capital-intensive manufacturing trends, rather than a purely value or defensive approach. The inclusion of significant stakes in Consumer Cyclical assets at eight percent further reinforces a focus on economic expansion scenarios where discretionary spending remains robust.
Concentration risk within the fund appears moderate to low based on the distribution of holdings across sectors and individual positions. Although Technology is the largest single sector, its weight does not dominate the entire portfolio to an extreme degree when compared to highly concentrated thematic funds. The top ten holdings collectively represent just 9.2% of assets under management, indicating a strategy that prioritizes diversification even within specific industry verticals. This broad dispersion across ninety-four technology names and nearly one hundred industrial stocks mitigates idiosyncratic risk associated with any single issuer, such as Western Digital or Flex Ltd., suggesting the fund aims to capture sector-wide trends rather than relying on individual stock performance.
Factor tilts implied by this allocation include a strong bias toward momentum and growth factors, driven largely by the heavy representation of semiconductor and hardware manufacturers in the technology slice. The presence of Energy at 5.8% alongside Utilities at nearly five percent introduces some cyclical volatility but also provides exposure to inflation-hedging assets often absent from pure tech-focused vehicles. While Healthcare and Financial Services are present, their weights under seven percent each indicate that defensive characteristics or stable yield generation are secondary objectives compared to capturing capital appreciation in high-growth environments. The data reflects a balanced yet aggressive stance designed for investors seeking growth potential without the extreme concentration risks found in niche thematic strategies.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 19:09:35.178083+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share ONEO's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of ONEO's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPTMSPTM | $12B | — | 817 | 95.5% |
| VONEVONE | $10B | — | 483 | 71.4% |
| VONVVONV | $18B | — | 484 | 70.7% |
| VTIVanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares | $2.1T | 0.03% | 471 | 70.5% |
| QUSQUS | $1B | — | 504 | 70.4% |
96% of ONEO's portfolio by weight is also held by SPTM, which commands 464× more assets under management. When SPTM receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging ONEO's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofONEO's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 91% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 59% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside ONEO collectively pay out 61% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is a sustainable payout level with moderate room for dividend growth. Based on 43% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryONEO is up 27.3% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +19.0%. The remaining +8.3% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 57% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of ONEO's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of ONEO's analyzed weight, 45% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 55% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 53% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
ONEO has a Passive Crowding Score of 43/100. On average, 13.0% of the market capitalization of ONEO's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 35 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WDC | WESTERN DIGITAL CORP Technology | 1.91% | 31.8x | 6/9 |
| 2 | FLEX | FLEX LTD | 1.25% | 65.0x | 6/9 |
| 3 | MU | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC Technology | 1.11% | 45.9x | 7/9 |
| 4 | MPWR | MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC Technology | 0.93% | 112.4x | 5/9 |
| 5 | JBL | JABIL INC | 0.78% | 37.1x | 4/9 |
| 6 | DVN | DEVON ENERGY CORP Energy | 0.71% | 12.4x | 6/9 |
| 7 | LRCX | LAM RESEARCH CORP Technology | 0.68% | 60.3x | 7/9 |
| 8 | Q | QNITY ELECTRONICS INC | 0.67% | 33.2x | 5/9 |
| 9 | MCK | MCKESSON CORP Healthcare | 0.65% | 19.3x | 5/9 |
| 10 | FTI | TECHNIPFMC PLC Energy | 0.61% | 26.2x | 9/9 |
| 11 | TER | TERADYNE INC Technology | 0.61% | 69.4x | 5/9 |
| 12 | MPC | MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP Energy | 0.60% | 16.4x | 7/9 |
| 13 | KLAC | KLA CORP Technology | 0.58% | 54.3x | 8/9 |
| 14 | DELL | DELL TECHNOLOGIES C Technology | 0.57% | 48.5x | 6/9 |
| 15 | AMAT | APPLIED MATERIALS INC Technology | 0.55% | 42.4x | 6/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how ONEO’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 12.2% tracked weight2026-05-23
15 holdings · 12.2% tracked weight2026-05-22
15 holdings · 12.1% tracked weight2026-05-21
15 holdings · 11.9% tracked weight2026-05-20
15 holdings · 11.9% tracked weightSource: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove ONEO Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How ONEO’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.