ETF · Broad Market

VONE(VONE)

$340.50
+0.83%
Expense Ratio
$10.3B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Closet Indexer
0%20%60%100%
5.8%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation reveals a strong affinity for high-growth industries, with Technology representing nearly 36% of the fund's holdings, followed closely by Financial Services and Communication Services. This tilt towards growth-oriented sectors is consistent with the valuation posture, as evidenced by a weighted P/E ratio of 27.7x and a weighted P/B ratio of 14.35x, both of which suggest that the portfolio is positioned for long-term growth rather than income generation.

Concentration risk is elevated due to the significant presence of top holdings such as NVDA (7.2%), AAPL (6.5%), and MSFT (4.8%), which together account for over 18% of the fund's assets. The sector mix deviates from the broader market, with Technology and Financial Services sectors overweighted relative to their respective market weights. A favorable macro environment would likely be one characterized by sustained technological innovation and growth in digital services, while a downturn in these areas could have a disproportionate impact on the portfolio's performance.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-06 08:43:16.011443+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 85/100

The investment theme implied by the ticker VONE, which typically denotes a broad U.S. equity market exposure rather than a specific niche sector, aligns closely with the actual composition of the fund's portfolio. The top holdings are dominated by major technology and communication services leaders such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta, and Broadcom, reflecting the significant weight assigned to these industries within the broader U.S. market index this ETF tracks. While these mega-cap names drive a substantial portion of the returns, their inclusion is consistent with a large-cap blend strategy rather than an indication that the fund has drifted from its intended mandate. The presence of diversified sectors like financial services, healthcare, industrials, and consumer staples further supports the interpretation that this vehicle serves as a comprehensive market proxy rather than a thematic play on any single industry vertical.

The sector breakdown demonstrates strong coherence with a broad-market approach, where technology accounts for nearly one-third of assets while other established pillars like finance and communication services maintain double-digit exposures. This distribution ensures that the fund remains genuinely differentiated from narrow-sector indices or concentrated growth strategies, as evidenced by the diverse representation across eleven distinct sectors including energy, utilities, and real estate. Although the top ten holdings represent a significant concentration of 35.6%, this level of weighting is characteristic of large-cap heavy broad market benchmarks where index weights naturally skew toward dominant players rather than reflecting poor thematic alignment or deceptive marketing practices. The portfolio structure effectively mirrors the aggregate performance of the U.S. equity landscape, offering investors exposure to both high-growth innovators and stable traditional industries in proportions that reflect their actual economic significance within the total market capitalization.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 21:59:05.536841+00

⚠️ Systemic Risk Synthesis

AI Generated

The newly disclosed risk factors from the top holdings of VONE highlight a convergence of systemic macro-level threats centered on regulatory expansion and operational cost escalation. A dominant theme emerging across these disclosures is the potential material adverse impact stemming from compliance with climate change regulations, which poses a direct challenge to financial conditions for major technology leaders like NVIDIA. Simultaneously, there is a pronounced exposure to evolving cybersecurity mandates and data privacy requirements that could significantly increase operational expenditures and constrain business agility. Furthermore, the specific mention of responsible AI usage regulations indicates that emerging governance frameworks are beginning to influence competitive positioning and cost structures within the artificial intelligence sector.

The concentration of these shared risks among the fund's largest positions suggests a high degree of correlated downside potential rather than isolated idiosyncratic events. With NVIDIA alone carrying substantial weight in each of these three categories, and similar regulatory pressures likely affecting peers such as Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Meta given their industry standing, the portfolio faces synchronized headwinds from external policy shifts. The fact that multiple top-tier holdings explicitly flag increased costs due to environmental compliance and data privacy adherence indicates that a broad tightening of global regulations could simultaneously erode margins across the fund's core technology exposure. This clustering of risk factors implies that macro-level regulatory actions in climate, cybersecurity, and AI governance represent a unified threat vector rather than diversified risks.

While systemic issues dominate the current disclosures, NVIDIA's specific 7.1% weighting amplifies its unique vulnerabilities regarding environmental compliance and AI regulation more significantly than any other single holding in this list. The explicit statement that adherence to data privacy requirements may affect business operations for such a large position underscores how regulatory changes could disproportionately impact overall fund performance if these mandates become stricter or more widespread. Additionally, the presence of traditional sectors like energy (XOM) and financials (JPM) alongside heavy technology weights means that while tech-specific risks are prominent, the broader portfolio remains exposed to varied macroeconomic conditions inherent in different industries.

Synthesized from constituent 10-K risk factor disclosures. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 05:37:29.910775+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The sector allocation of VONE reveals a pronounced tilt toward growth-oriented industries, with Technology comprising nearly one-third of the portfolio. This heavy weighting suggests an investment thesis centered on capturing high-growth momentum and innovation premiums found in large-cap equities. The presence of significant positions in Communication Services and Consumer Cyclical sectors further reinforces this focus on companies driving digital transformation and discretionary spending trends. Conversely, defensive sectors such as Utilities, Real Estate, and Basic Materials represent a modest portion of the fund, indicating that capital preservation through low-volatility or income-generating assets is not the primary objective of this strategy.

Concentration risk appears elevated due to both sector skewing and top-heavy holdings within those sectors. The Top 10 concentration metric stands at 35.6%, driven largely by the dominance of mega-cap technology firms like NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT in the overall allocation. This structure implies that a substantial portion of the fund's performance will be directly correlated with the stock price movements of these specific leaders rather than broad market diversification across all sectors. While Financial Services and Industrials provide some breadth, their weights are insufficient to fully offset the volatility potential inherent in such a concentrated technology exposure.

From a factor perspective, this allocation exhibits characteristics typical of quality and momentum factors but lacks explicit value or small-cap tilts given the absence of smaller holdings data and the heavy reliance on established giants. The limited representation in Energy and Healthcare suggests the fund is not seeking exposure to cyclical commodity recovery or defensive healthcare stability as primary drivers. Ultimately, the portfolio construction prioritizes capturing upside potential from dominant market players while accepting higher idiosyncratic risk associated with a narrow sector focus.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 22:03:51.192975+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share VONE's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of VONE's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
VTIVanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares$2.1T0.03%48293.8%
QUSQUS$1B45992.8%
SPTMSPTM$12B46392.7%
SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust$640B0.09%42591.6%
VOOVanguard S&P 500 ETF$1.5T0.03%42391.3%

94% of VONE's portfolio by weight is also held by VTI, which commands 203× more assets under management. When VTI receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging VONE's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofVONE's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

27.7x
Weighted P/E
14.35x
Weighted P/B
$1.5T
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 97% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000187
Well Diversified
Top 5: 25.4%Top 10: 36.3%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Large Growth

Sector & Cap Explorer

Technology37.6%Financial Services10.6%Communication Services10.5%Consumer Cyclical9.6%Healthcare8.1%Industrials7.8%Consumer Defensive4.4%Other2.6%Basic Materials1.8%Real Estate1.7%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
80% Weight
Market Cap
Mega
Risk Profile
Moderate

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
3%
0–3 Weak
51%
4–6 Average
27%
7–9 Strong

Based on 80% of fund weight with Piotroski data.

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
35%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
0.00%
TTM Yield
Very Safe
Dividend Durability
35% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside VONE collectively pay out 35% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 62% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+21.6%
ETF 1Y Return
+39.6%
Wtd Earnings Growth
-18.0%
Multiple Contraction
Earnings

VONE is up 21.6% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +39.6%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 18.0% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 78% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of VONE's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

68% Creators
32% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)51.0%
Value Destroyers24.1%

Of VONE's analyzed weight, 68% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 32% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 75% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

37/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership11.1%
Most Crowded HoldingHON (27.1%)
Least CrowdedGOOG (4.3%)
Coverage70% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

VONE has a Passive Crowding Score of 37/100. On average, 11.1% of the market capitalization of VONE's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 51 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration36.3%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
Technology
7.15%
29.8x4/9
2AAPL
Apple Inc.
Technology
6.50%
37.3x8/9
3MSFT
Microsoft Corp.
Technology
4.83%
23.3x5/9
4AMZN
Amazon.com Inc.
Consumer Cyclical
3.76%
31.6x6/9
5GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
Communication Services
3.20%
27.5x6/9
6AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
Technology
2.98%
59.9x8/9
7GOOG
Alphabet Inc. Class C
Communication Services
2.57%
27.2x6/9
8META
Facebook Inc. Class A
Communication Services
2.00%
21.2x5/9
9TSLA
Tesla Inc.
Consumer Cyclical
1.78%
357.7x5/9
10MU
Micron Technology Inc.
Technology
1.57%
22.1x7/9
11LLY
Eli Lilly & Co.
Healthcare
1.28%
43.1x7/9
12BRK.B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B
Financial Services
1.27%
15.1x
13AMD
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
Technology
1.20%
172.6x7/9
14JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Financial Services
1.10%
16.0x3/9
15XOM
Exxon Mobil Corp.
Energy
0.89%
23.1x5/9
The bottom 485 stocks in VONE account for only 57.9% of the total fund weight.Only the top 50 holdings are shown. Total holdings: 500.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how VONE’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-07-07

15 holdings · 42.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NVDA7.15%3,839,901$810.8M
2AAPL6.50%2,363,650$737.6M
3MSFT4.83%1,216,818$547.9M
4AMZN3.76%1,573,896$426.0M
5GOOGL3.20%954,531$363.0M
6AVGO2.98%757,724$338.5M
7GOOG2.57%775,702$292.0M
8META2.00%358,239$226.6M
9TSLA1.78%462,962$201.8M
10MU1.57%183,327$178.0M
11LLY1.28%131,445$145.2M
12BRK.B1.27%302,604$143.6M
13AMD1.20%264,228$136.4M
14JPM1.10%416,343$124.6M
15XOM0.89%693,236$100.7M

2026-07-06

15 holdings · 42.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NVDA7.15%3,839,901$810.8M
2AAPL6.50%2,363,650$737.6M
3MSFT4.83%1,216,818$547.9M
4AMZN3.76%1,573,896$426.0M
5GOOGL3.20%954,531$363.0M
6AVGO2.98%757,724$338.5M
7GOOG2.57%775,702$292.0M
8META2.00%358,239$226.6M
9TSLA1.78%462,962$201.8M
10MU1.57%183,327$178.0M
11LLY1.28%131,445$145.2M
12BRK.B1.27%302,604$143.6M
13AMD1.20%264,228$136.4M
14JPM1.10%416,343$124.6M
15XOM0.89%693,236$100.7M

2026-07-05

15 holdings · 42.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NVDA7.15%3,839,901$810.8M
2AAPL6.50%2,363,650$737.6M
3MSFT4.83%1,216,818$547.9M
4AMZN3.76%1,573,896$426.0M
5GOOGL3.20%954,531$363.0M
6AVGO2.98%757,724$338.5M
7GOOG2.57%775,702$292.0M
8META2.00%358,239$226.6M
9TSLA1.78%462,962$201.8M
10MU1.57%183,327$178.0M
11LLY1.28%131,445$145.2M
12BRK.B1.27%302,604$143.6M
13AMD1.20%264,228$136.4M
14JPM1.10%416,343$124.6M
15XOM0.89%693,236$100.7M

2026-07-04

15 holdings · 42.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NVDA7.15%3,839,901$810.8M
2AAPL6.50%2,363,650$737.6M
3MSFT4.83%1,216,818$547.9M
4AMZN3.76%1,573,896$426.0M
5GOOGL3.20%954,531$363.0M
6AVGO2.98%757,724$338.5M
7GOOG2.57%775,702$292.0M
8META2.00%358,239$226.6M
9TSLA1.78%462,962$201.8M
10MU1.57%183,327$178.0M
11LLY1.28%131,445$145.2M
12BRK.B1.27%302,604$143.6M
13AMD1.20%264,228$136.4M
14JPM1.10%416,343$124.6M
15XOM0.89%693,236$100.7M

2026-07-03

15 holdings · 42.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NVDA7.15%3,839,901$810.8M
2AAPL6.50%2,363,650$737.6M
3MSFT4.83%1,216,818$547.9M
4AMZN3.76%1,573,896$426.0M
5GOOGL3.20%954,531$363.0M
6AVGO2.98%757,724$338.5M
7GOOG2.57%775,702$292.0M
8META2.00%358,239$226.6M
9TSLA1.78%462,962$201.8M
10MU1.57%183,327$178.0M
11LLY1.28%131,445$145.2M
12BRK.B1.27%302,604$143.6M
13AMD1.20%264,228$136.4M
14JPM1.10%416,343$124.6M
15XOM0.89%693,236$100.7M

2026-07-02

15 holdings · 42.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NVDA7.15%3,839,901$810.8M
2AAPL6.50%2,363,650$737.6M
3MSFT4.83%1,216,818$547.9M
4AMZN3.76%1,573,896$426.0M
5GOOGL3.20%954,531$363.0M
6AVGO2.98%757,724$338.5M
7GOOG2.57%775,702$292.0M
8META2.00%358,239$226.6M
9TSLA1.78%462,962$201.8M
10MU1.57%183,327$178.0M
11LLY1.28%131,445$145.2M
12BRK.B1.27%302,604$143.6M
13AMD1.20%264,228$136.4M
14JPM1.10%416,343$124.6M
15XOM0.89%693,236$100.7M

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

16.9%
Annual Volatility
1.24
Sharpe (1Y)
1.03
Sharpe (3Y)
-19.1%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-25.1%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove VONE Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+0.83%(2026-07-06)

Top Contributors

+0.315%
+0.078%
+0.028%

Top Detractors

-0.100%
-0.133%
-0.195%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.00%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How VONE’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-07-0782 snapshots
Technology37.6%
Financial Services10.6%
Communication Services10.5%
Consumer Cyclical9.6%
Healthcare8.1%
Industrials7.8%
Consumer Defensive4.4%
Energy3.2%
Other2.6%
Utilities2.1%
Basic Materials1.8%
Real Estate1.7%
Change since 2026-03-30
Technology
+5.8%
Healthcare
-1.5%
Financial Services
-1.2%
Industrials
-1.0%
Consumer Defensive
-0.9%
Utilities
-0.4%
2026-03-302026-07-07

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-06.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.