Healthcare / Drug Manufacturers - General

Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)

$1064.15
-1.67%
$985.4B
Market Cap
39.2
P/E Ratio
0.48
Beta
0.63%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 7.8 SafeBeneish M -1.91 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC +22.5%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 39.2x earnings — a 40% discount to the sector average of 65.2x — LLY is in the lower valuation range. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 7.8 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). DCF fair value of $296 implies 68% downside based on model assumptions. Beneish M-Score of -1.91 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency of this healthcare giant is exceptional, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of 22.9%, indicating robust value creation relative to the cost of equity. This high return on invested capital is primarily driven by superior operational leverage rather than asset intensity or financial engineering; specifically, a net margin of 31.7% and gross margin of 83.0% fuel an ROE of 77.8%, while moderate leverage (Equity Multiplier at 4.24x) and modest turnover (0.58x) suggest earnings power stems from pricing strength or product mix rather than aggressive balance sheet expansion. Fundamental integrity appears solid with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, an Altman Z-Score of 8.1 signaling low bankruptcy risk, and a Beneish M-Score of -1.91 suggesting minimal earnings manipulation concerns, all underpinned by revenue growth accelerating at 44.7% year-over-year.

However, the current market valuation implies aggressive future expectations that may not align with intrinsic value models. Trading at a P/E ratio of 40.8x versus a sector average of 30.8x suggests the price has already priced in significant expansion, potentially leaving little room for error if growth decelerates. More critically, discounted cash flow analysis points to a fair value of $327 with an implied downside of -64.4% from current levels, highlighting a substantial divergence between market sentiment and model-based estimates based on assumed long-term free cash flow growth rates. This disconnect indicates the stock is trading at a premium justified only if the company can sustainably deliver revenue expansion far exceeding historical averages to maintain its high margin profile without eroding returns through excessive reinvestment.

Risk metrics present a nuanced picture where strong alpha generation conflicts with specific factor exposures and insider sentiment. Although the Fama-French annualized alpha of 14.67% demonstrates significant outperformance relative to standard benchmarks, the Profitability Factor (RMW) score of -0.238 flags potential weaknesses in profitability sustainability despite current high margins, while the Value Factor remains neutral at 0.067. Compounding these fundamental signals is a notable divergence between institutional pricing and insider behavior; over the last ninety days, net selling by insiders totaled approximately $324 million, which contrasts sharply with the bullish momentum implied by recent revenue surges and suggests management or major holders may perceive elevated valuation risks not fully captured in public metrics.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$1064.15
Fair Value
$305
Implied Upside
-71.4%
$305IMPLIED FAIR VALUEOVERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)25%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)7.8%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
28.5%annual FCF growth priced in at $1064.15

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 45% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%7.8%9.8%
2%$385$246$169
3%$512$296$193
4%$766$373$227

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $1064.15.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.8%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $296 (-68.2%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

39.2x
LLY P/E
65.2x
Sector Avg
38.4x
5Y Avg P/E
-40%
vs Sector

Currently trading 7% above its 5-year average P/E of 38.4x.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Technical Setup

AI Generated

Eli Lilly and Company is currently trading at $874.00, a price point that warrants examination against its surrounding moving average envelope to gauge relative positioning. Without specific values for the short-term or long-term simple moving averages defining this envelope, it remains unclear whether the current share price resides within the established mean-reversion zone, above an upper boundary suggesting potential exhaustion, or below a lower boundary indicating possible oversold conditions. The absence of these critical reference lines prevents a definitive assessment of how far the asset has deviated from its historical average trend over recent periods. In technical analysis, proximity to the center of such an envelope often signals alignment with the mean, while extreme deviations can foreshadow a corrective move back toward equilibrium. Since the specific upper and lower bands are not provided in the current dataset, any inference regarding imminent reversal or continuation patterns would be speculative rather than factual. The market structure at $874.00 simply exists as an isolated data point until contextualized by the dynamic support and resistance levels generated by moving averages. Consequently, observers must await further clarification on where this price sits relative to the calculated mean to assess the validity of a mean-reversion thesis. Whether the current valuation implies significant upside potential if the trend corrects downward or downside risk if it rebounds upward depends entirely on the distance from these invisible boundaries. Until those parameters are defined, the technical setup remains indeterminate regarding its specific bias toward either regression to the mean or momentum continuation.

RSI (14)
SMA 50
SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
7.8
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-1.91
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

83.0%
Gross Margin
31.7%
Net Margin
30.4%
ROIC
7.8%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +22.5%— Positive value creation spread.
+44.7%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+94.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
6.0B
Free Cash Flow
90%
FCF Payout Ratio

⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

31.7%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.58x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
4.24x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
77.8%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

3.24x
Debt / Equity
1.58x
Current Ratio
1.1x
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.68%
FCF Yield
31.7B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$324M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
2
Sale Transactions
2026-03-16ALVAREZ RALPHGrant$12,416
2026-03-16FYRWALD J. ERIKGrant$9,917
2026-03-16SULZBERGER GABRIELLEGrant$4,958
2026-03-16LUCIANO JUAN RGrant$15,917
2026-02-19DOZIER ERICOther481 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $3.54
Act: $3.34
-5.7%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $5.59
Act: $6.31
+12.9%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $5.89
Act: $7.02
+19.2%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $6.91
Act: $7.54
+9.1%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$1.7300
Latest Dividend
$6.00
2025 Total
+15.4%
YoY Growth
9 yrs
Consecutive Increases
Annual Dividends per Share
$1.02
2016
$2.08
2017
$2.25
2018
$2.58
2019
$2.96
2020
$3.40
2021
$3.92
2022
$4.52
2023
$5.20
2024
$6.00
2025
$3.46
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-05-15$1.73000.0%
2026-02-13$1.7300+15.3%
2025-11-14$1.50000.0%
2025-08-15$1.50000.0%
2025-05-16$1.50000.0%
2025-02-14$1.5000+15.4%
2024-11-15$1.30000.0%
2024-08-15$1.30000.0%
2024-05-15$1.30000.0%
2024-02-14$1.3000+15.0%
2023-11-14$1.13000.0%
2023-08-14$1.13000.0%
Stock Splits
1997-10-16: 2:11995-12-21: 2:11989-05-01: 2:11986-01-30: 2:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

41.4%
Annual Volatility
0.61
Sharpe (1Y)
-30.3%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

0.61
Market β
Mkt-RF
+0.116
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
+0.067
Value (HML)
Neutral
-0.238
Profit (RMW)
Weak
+0.383
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): +14.67%
R²: 9.3%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

24.8
Forward P/E
1.51
PEG Ratio
31.65
Price/Book
3M
Avg Volume
$1149.10
52W High
$623.78
52W Low
84%
52W Range Position

10-K Risk Factor Expansion

Word count of Item 1A (Risk Factors) across annual filings. Rising counts often signal new regulatory, competitive, or operational risks.

+12.9%
YoY Change (20242025)
10,929
Latest Word Count
+85%
5-Year Total
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025

Smart Money Flow

Institutional 13F filings from top hedge funds. Positions updated quarterly from SEC EDGAR.

FundQuarterShares Change% ChangeAction
Point72 Asset Mgmt2026-Q1-7,100-24.8%Decreased
Soros Fund Management2026-Q1-135-0.6%Decreased
Renaissance Technologies2026-Q1-94,059-56.7%Decreased
Two Sigma Investments2026-Q1+700+23.3%Increased
Citadel Advisors2026-Q1-507,000-24.3%Decreased
Bridgewater Associates2026-Q1-2,480-3.4%Decreased
DE Shaw2026-Q1-80,600-30.3%Decreased
Millennium Management2026-Q1-355,300-72.8%Decreased
Citadel Advisors2025-Q4-133,800-6.0%Decreased
DE Shaw2025-Q4-46,500-14.9%Decreased
Two Sigma Investments2025-Q4+1,000+50.0%Increased
Point72 Asset Mgmt2025-Q4+24,100+535.6%Increased

Source: SEC 13F-HR filings. 13F data is delayed ~45 days after quarter end. Not investment advice.

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$96.7B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding LLY
1.51%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.4T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XLV or IYH, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell LLY shares regardless of Eli Lilly and Company's individual fundamentals. We estimate $96.7B of passive capital is structurally linked to LLY through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Eli Lilly and Company to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

LLY Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
LLYEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFJNJLow RiskNVDALow RiskJNJLow RiskAAPLLow RiskABBVMed Risk
LLY Price Drop (%)0

If Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with LLY. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 34 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

LLY Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 9 LLY shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
LLY
Total Shares
892M
ETF Lock-Up
11.5%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
11.5%Locked Float

Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 15.4% of the State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and 13.7% of the IYH (IYH). Across 31 tracked ETFs, approximately 103M shares (11.5% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

LLY Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
LLY
PRICE
$1064.15
FLOOR (POC)
$765.84
STRENGTH
Medium
$634$660$687$713$7398%$766POC 11%$7927%$819$845$872$898$924$951$977$10047%$10309%$10579%$1064.15$1083$1109$1136
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for Eli Lilly and Company over the past year sits near $765.84 (11% of 252-day volume). The current price of $1064.15 trades 39.0% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

LLY Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Eli Lilly and Company convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$6.0B
EBITDA
$31.7B
FCF Conversion
19%
Reinvestment Rate
81%
19% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
30.4%
ROIC − WACC Spread
22.5%

Eli Lilly and Company converts 19% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 81% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 22.5% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-121,800$966.99$1.7M
2026-05-1127$948.45$25,608.15
2026-05-084$974.96$3,899.84
2026-05-0727$987.05$26,650.35
2026-05-045,994$963.33$5.8M
2026-04-2016,403$927.03$15.2M
2026-04-1713,384$903.99$12.1M
2026-04-156$922.50$5,535
2026-04-1428$929.55$26,027.4
2026-04-0976$953.30$72,450.8
2026-04-014$919.77$3,679.08
2026-03-25179$903.02$161,640.58
2026-03-233,358$906.70$3.0M
2026-03-2015$917.50$13,762.5
2026-03-1718,453$989.12$18.3M
2026-03-1637$985.08$36,447.96
2026-03-1036$1008.39$36,302.04
2026-03-095,000$990.33$5.0M
2026-03-02106$1051.99$111,510.94
2026-02-23250$1009.52$252,380
2026-02-1965$1020.56$66,336.4
2026-02-17700$1040.00$728,000
2026-02-13100$1038.27$103,827
2026-02-11160$1025.00$164,000
2026-02-093,256$1058.18$3.4M
2026-02-0617$1020.84$17,354.28
2026-01-26379$1064.29$403,365.91
2026-01-221,304$1078.52$1.4M
2026-01-20185$1038.40$192,104
2025-12-3012,062$1078.73$13.0M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Institutional Holdings (13F Filings)

Raw SEC 13F-HR filings from institutional investment managers. Shows exact share counts and portfolio values as reported to the SEC.

FundQuarterSharesValue ($K)
Citadel Advisors2026-Q11,581,800$1,454,892,186K
DE Shaw2026-Q1185,700$170,801,289K
Millennium Management2026-Q1132,900$122,237,433K
Renaissance Technologies2026-Q171,788$66,028,597K
Bridgewater Associates2026-Q170,812$65,130,753K
Soros Fund Management2026-Q122,199$20,417,974K
Point72 Asset Mgmt2026-Q121,500$19,775,055K
Two Sigma Investments2026-Q13,700$3,403,149K
Citadel Advisors2025-Q42,088,800$2,244,791,584K
Millennium Management2025-Q4488,200$524,658,776K
DE Shaw2025-Q4266,300$286,187,284K
Renaissance Technologies2025-Q4165,847$178,232,454K
Bridgewater Associates2025-Q473,292$78,765,447K
Point72 Asset Mgmt2025-Q428,600$30,735,848K
Soros Fund Management2025-Q422,334$24,001,903K

Source: SEC 13F-HR filings. Values reported in thousands. 13F data is delayed ~45 days after quarter end.

SEC Comment Letters

SEC correspondence with the company regarding their filings. Comment letters often flag disclosure deficiencies, accounting concerns, or material omissions.

Source: SEC EDGAR correspondence. Comment letters are public records of SEC staff review of company filings.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
AMGN0.4600.571Moderate
MRK0.4390.287Moderate
AZN0.4220.337Moderate
BMY0.4020.388Moderate
PFE0.3940.370Moderate
ABBV0.3590.243Moderate
A0.3520.303Moderate
VRTX0.3450.407Moderate
JNJ0.3440.330Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare LLY to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.