Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicADI trades at 61.8x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 65.0x. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 8.1 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). DCF fair value of $118 implies 66% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Analog Devices present a distinct dichotomy between robust operational metrics and inefficient capital deployment. While the DuPont decomposition reveals that earnings power is primarily driven by exceptional net margins at 20.6%, rather than asset turnover or leverage, this profitability comes with significant efficiency constraints; an ROIC of only 5.3% falling short of the 10.8% WACC generates a negative spread of -5.4%. This capital destruction persists despite strong balance sheet health indicated by an Altman Z-Score of 7.2 and low earnings manipulation risk suggested by a Beneish M-Score of -2.73, alongside a high-quality Piotroski F-Score of 8/9. The company is clearly executing on revenue growth with a 16.9% YoY increase supported by healthy gross margins near 61.5%, yet the inability to generate returns above the cost of capital suggests management struggles to deploy equity efficiently at scale.
Valuation metrics indicate that the market price has detached from intrinsic value, pricing in aggressive future performance rather than current fundamentals. The current P/E multiple of 58.1x stands significantly elevated against a sector average of 42.2x, while the DCF model implies a fair value approximately 61.7% below the current trading level based on an assumed ten-year free cash flow growth rate of 17.4%. This discrepancy suggests that investors are demanding a premium for perceived optionality or momentum that is not currently supported by the company's return profile, as evidenced by the negative ROIC-WACC spread which contradicts typical high-multiple justifications found in profitable tech peers.
Risk and reward factors further complicate the investment thesis through conflicting signals regarding factor exposure and insider behavior. Although the stock exhibits a substantial Fama-French alpha of 23.79%, indicating strong historical momentum, this is counterbalanced by a negative Value Factor (HML) tilt at 0.108 and neutral Profitability Factor (RMW) returns, suggesting it may be overvalued relative to its risk characteristics. Furthermore, the divergence between these positive factor alphas and insider activity warrants attention; net selling of nearly $20 million by insiders over the last 90 days introduces a potential headwind that contradicts the bullish momentum implied by the alpha data, creating an environment where valuation compression could be accelerated if insider sentiment persists.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 17% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 9% | 11% | 13% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $142 | $107 | $85 |
| 3% | $162 | $118 | $92 |
| 4% | $190 | $132 | $100 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $423.20.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $118 (-66.3%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 9% above its 5-year average P/E of 58.7x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedAnalog Devices, Inc. is currently trading at $397.07 within the technology sector. To assess relative value and mean-reversion potential, one must examine how this price point interacts with surrounding Simple Moving Average envelopes rather than relying on isolated figures. If the current level sits near or breaches the upper boundary of a defined moving average band, it suggests an extended valuation that may invite correction toward the mean over time. Conversely, positioning below the lower envelope could indicate oversold conditions where statistical probability favors a rebound upward. The distance between the $397.07 mark and these dynamic support or resistance lines serves as a quantitative gauge for volatility compression or expansion. Without specific moving average parameters provided in the immediate dataset, the analysis remains theoretical regarding exact mean-reversion triggers. However, the principle suggests that significant deviations from long-term averages often precede price adjustments back toward equilibrium zones. Traders observing this setup would monitor whether $397.07 acts as a pivot point for reversal or merely a transient level before further trending movement occurs in either direction. The ultimate implication depends entirely on how closely today's close aligns with the historical volatility bands calculated by standard technical frameworks, offering no definitive directional mandate but highlighting areas where statistical norms might challenge current market sentiment.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-02 | $1.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | $1.1000 | +11.1% |
| 2025-12-08 | $0.9900 | 0.0% |
| 2025-09-02 | $0.9900 | 0.0% |
| 2025-06-04 | $0.9900 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-04 | $0.9900 | +7.6% |
| 2024-12-09 | $0.9200 | 0.0% |
| 2024-09-03 | $0.9200 | 0.0% |
| 2024-06-04 | $0.9200 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-04 | $0.9200 | +7.0% |
| 2023-12-01 | $0.8600 | 0.0% |
| 2023-09-01 | $0.8600 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like SMH or SOXX, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ADI shares regardless of Analog Devices, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $27.8B of passive capital is structurally linked to ADI through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Analog Devices, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NVIDIA Corp (NVDA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with ADI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 34 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ADI Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 ADI shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.3% of the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and 4.0% of the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Across 34 tracked ETFs, approximately 83M shares (17.1% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest ADI Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 34 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ADI Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Analog Devices, Inc. over the past year sits near $237.37 (19% of 252-day volume). The current price of $423.20 trades 78.3% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (19% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
ADI Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Analog Devices, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Analog Devices, Inc. converts 85% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-5.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 6,675 | $432.39 | $2.9M |
| 2026-05-13 | 19,675 | $419.65 | $8.3M |
| 2026-05-08 | 28 | $408.52 | $11,438.56 |
| 2026-05-07 | 1,129 | $415.63 | $469,246.27 |
| 2026-05-06 | 47 | $404.77 | $19,024.19 |
| 2026-04-30 | 467 | $389.31 | $181,807.77 |
| 2026-04-27 | 10,760 | $399.57 | $4.3M |
| 2026-04-23 | 1 | $381.42 | $381.42 |
| 2026-04-20 | 7 | $371.45 | $2,600.15 |
| 2026-04-16 | 194 | $347.94 | $67,500.36 |
| 2026-04-15 | 2 | $348.60 | $697.2 |
| 2026-04-09 | 2 | $346.21 | $692.42 |
| 2026-04-08 | 1 | $327.41 | $327.41 |
| 2026-04-06 | 978 | $318.34 | $311,336.52 |
| 2026-04-01 | 699 | $318.14 | $222,379.86 |
| 2026-03-31 | 11,045 | $303.10 | $3.3M |
| 2026-03-30 | 3 | $307.44 | $922.32 |
| 2026-03-26 | 248 | $322.03 | $79,863.44 |
| 2026-03-25 | 49 | $321.83 | $15,769.67 |
| 2026-03-24 | 37 | $312.19 | $11,551.03 |
| 2026-03-23 | 83 | $309.43 | $25,682.69 |
| 2026-03-17 | 2 | $310.92 | $621.84 |
| 2026-03-06 | 5 | $329.72 | $1,648.6 |
| 2026-03-03 | 15,313 | $352.41 | $5.4M |
| 2026-02-26 | 16 | $360.80 | $5,772.8 |
| 2026-02-24 | 1,278 | $355.15 | $453,881.7 |
| 2026-02-23 | 2,241 | $355.03 | $795,622.23 |
| 2026-02-12 | 705 | $337.00 | $237,585 |
| 2026-02-09 | 12 | $320.45 | $3,845.4 |
| 2026-02-04 | 137 | $311.29 | $42,646.73 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
SEC Comment Letters
SEC correspondence with the company regarding their filings. Comment letters often flag disclosure deficiencies, accounting concerns, or material omissions.
Source: SEC EDGAR correspondence. Comment letters are public records of SEC staff review of company filings.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| NXPI | 0.783 | 0.761 | High co-movement |
| NL0009538784 | 0.781 | 0.758 | High co-movement |
| MCHP | 0.779 | 0.782 | High co-movement |
| TXN | 0.756 | 0.754 | High co-movement |
| ON | 0.708 | 0.761 | High co-movement |
| MPWR | 0.686 | 0.706 | Moderate |
| AMAT | 0.618 | 0.641 | Moderate |
| POWI | 0.605 | 0.584 | Moderate |
| KLAC | 0.601 | 0.586 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare ADI to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.