ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicON trades at 88.7x earnings — a 36% premium to its sector average of 65.0x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9. DCF fair value of $52 implies 27% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of ON Semiconductor reveal a significant capital allocation challenge, characterized by an ROIC-WACC spread of -11.6%, indicating that the firm is currently destroying value relative to its cost of capital. This negative spread stems from a DuPont ROE decomposition where thin 2.0% net margins and modest asset turnover drive returns well below required thresholds for a technology sector leader. While the Altman Z-Score of 4.8 suggests moderate bankruptcy safety, the Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 signals deteriorating financial health, compounded by revenue contraction of -15.3% YoY that contrasts sharply with implied future cash flow growth assumptions embedded in valuation models.
Valuation metrics present a stark divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flows. The stock trades at a P/E multiple of 214.4x, vastly exceeding the sector average of 57.8x and implying an aggressive long-term FCF growth rate of 17.6% per annum that may not be sustainable given current profitability trends. This disconnect results in a DCF fair value estimate approximately 14.8% below current levels, suggesting the market is pricing in substantial recovery potential despite weak underlying margin expansion and negative recent performance delta.
Risk factor analysis highlights exposure to specific style anomalies and insider sentiment shifts that warrant scrutiny. The stock exhibits strong momentum characteristics with an annual Fama-French alpha of 15.42%, yet this outperformance occurs alongside a value factor score (HML) of -0.284, confirming its aggressive growth tilt rather than defensive positioning. Furthermore, the Profitability Factor (RMW) registers at -0.290, reflecting weak profitability relative to peers, while insider flow data indicates $9.59 million in net selling over the last 90 days, providing additional context regarding management's view of near-term prospects amidst these structural headwinds.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of -15% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 11.1% | 13.1% | 15.1% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $61 | $48 | $40 |
| 3% | $67 | $52 | $42 |
| 4% | $75 | $57 | $45 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $128.64.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=13.1%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $52 (-26.6%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 17% above its 5-year average P/E of 202.5x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe security ON is currently trading below its 50-day moving average but above the 200-day moving average, suggesting a recent weakening in short-term momentum within an overall neutral to slightly bullish longer-term trend. With an RSI of 36.2, which falls into oversold territory, this indicates potential near-term support or a possible rebound from current levels based on overbought/oversold conditions.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XSD or SOXX, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ON shares regardless of ON Semiconductor Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $6.0B of passive capital is structurally linked to ON through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in ON Semiconductor Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NVIDIA Corp (NVDA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with ON. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 31 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ON Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 5 ON shares, reducing daily market volatility.
ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.9% of the XSD (XSD) and 2.2% of the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Across 30 tracked ETFs, approximately 73M shares (18.8% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest ON Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ON Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for ON Semiconductor Corporation over the past year sits near $52.62 (22% of 252-day volume). The current price of $128.64 trades 144.5% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (22% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
ON Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does ON Semiconductor Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
ON Semiconductor Corporation converts 160% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-11.7%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 3,531 | $115.71 | $408,572.01 |
| 2026-05-11 | 77,081 | $103.20 | $8.0M |
| 2026-05-06 | 108 | $102.67 | $11,088.36 |
| 2026-05-04 | 2 | $103.03 | $206.06 |
| 2026-04-30 | 23,475 | $98.86 | $2.3M |
| 2026-04-27 | 10,514 | $98.40 | $1.0M |
| 2026-04-24 | 5,578 | $97.78 | $545,416.84 |
| 2026-04-23 | 1,709 | $88.99 | $152,083.91 |
| 2026-04-20 | 825 | $83.01 | $68,483.25 |
| 2026-04-15 | 1,167 | $72.05 | $84,082.35 |
| 2026-04-08 | 1,360 | $63.79 | $86,754.4 |
| 2026-04-06 | 160,512 | $62.19 | $10.0M |
| 2026-04-02 | 396 | $62.20 | $24,631.2 |
| 2026-04-01 | 5,398 | $61.92 | $334,244.16 |
| 2026-03-27 | 128 | $60.87 | $7,791.36 |
| 2026-03-26 | 1,125 | $63.10 | $70,987.5 |
| 2026-03-25 | 40 | $62.34 | $2,493.6 |
| 2026-03-24 | 2 | $59.89 | $119.78 |
| 2026-03-23 | 279 | $59.26 | $16,533.54 |
| 2026-03-16 | 29,352 | $58.55 | $1.7M |
| 2026-03-13 | 76,511 | $57.69 | $4.4M |
| 2026-02-25 | 62,641 | $70.03 | $4.4M |
| 2026-02-24 | 28,905 | $69.47 | $2.0M |
| 2026-02-23 | 1,529 | $69.11 | $105,669.19 |
| 2026-02-17 | 1,899 | $72.21 | $137,126.79 |
| 2026-02-09 | 9,000 | $65.20 | $586,800 |
| 2026-01-21 | 196,405 | $60.06 | $11.8M |
| 2026-01-20 | 2,400 | $60.33 | $144,792 |
| 2026-01-15 | 143 | $60.58 | $8,662.94 |
| 2026-01-14 | 73,394 | $59.41 | $4.4M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| MCHP | 0.760 | 0.824 | High co-movement |
| NXPI | 0.758 | 0.787 | High co-movement |
| NL0009538784 | 0.757 | 0.784 | High co-movement |
| ADI | 0.708 | 0.761 | High co-movement |
| TXN | 0.632 | 0.655 | Moderate |
| MPWR | 0.606 | 0.670 | Moderate |
| POWI | 0.589 | 0.620 | Moderate |
| SWKS | 0.571 | 0.535 | Moderate |
| QCOM | 0.550 | 0.561 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare ON to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.