ETF · Broad Market

VOE(VOE)

$195.70
+0.88%
Expense Ratio
$35.4B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
89.8%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

VOE presents a distinct capital allocation profile characterized by a heavy emphasis on income-generating assets within the broader equity landscape. The fund's sector weights reveal a pronounced tilt toward Financial Services at 14.9%, followed closely by Industrials and Energy, each holding approximately 13% of the portfolio. This distribution suggests an underlying strategy prioritizing sectors with historically strong dividend yields rather than pure capital appreciation growth stocks. Notably, while no single industry dominates entirely, the combined exposure to Energy and Utilities approaches 25%, indicating a significant allocation to cyclical and utility-driven cash flows that often correlate with interest rate environments and commodity prices.

Concentration analysis of the top holdings highlights a deliberate focus on specific market leaders across diverse sub-sectors. The largest positions include CMI in Industrials, SLB and VLO within Energy, and DLR in Real Estate, each representing roughly 1.3% to 1.6% of total assets under management. This structure implies that while the ETF maintains broad sector definitions, its actual risk exposure is heavily influenced by a relatively small group of high-yield companies like CMI, SLB, and VLO. The presence of multiple energy names alongside real estate trusts further underscores a thematic preference for established entities with substantial payout histories rather than speculative smaller-cap opportunities.

Quantitatively, the aggregate AUM of $35.4 billion signifies that VOE operates as a significant vehicle within its niche, offering investors access to a large pool of liquid assets without requiring direct ownership of individual dividend aristocrats. The blend of Financial Services and Industrials alongside substantial Energy holdings creates a portfolio where performance will likely be sensitive to macroeconomic factors affecting corporate profits and interest rates simultaneously. By synthesizing these sector weights with the specific composition of top-tier holdings, the fund effectively constructs an income-focused equity basket that balances traditional industrial stability with exposure to resource-rich industries, allowing for potential downside protection through diversification while maintaining a high yield profile inherent in its selected constituents.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 09:13:24.660086+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 15/100

The investment theme implied by the ticker VOE suggests a focus on value or specific factor exposures, yet the provided holdings and sector breakdown reveal a portfolio that lacks distinct thematic cohesion. The top ten positions are heavily weighted toward energy giants like SLB, VLO, MPC, PSX, and BKR, alongside industrials such as CMI and PCAR. This concentration in cyclical sectors contradicts any potential narrative of stability or defensive value often associated with funds bearing similar names in the broader market. Furthermore, the inclusion of diverse holdings ranging from real estate trusts like DLR to communication services firms like WBD indicates a lack of strict adherence to a singular investment philosophy, suggesting the fund may be utilizing broad-market constituents rather than maintaining a focused strategy.

Sector analysis highlights significant dispersion that undermines claims of thematic differentiation. While Energy and Industrials hold substantial weights at 12.7% and 12.9% respectively, Financial Services dominate with nearly 15%, creating an asset allocation profile more akin to a broad market index than a specialized vehicle. The presence of Utilities, Consumer Defensive, and Healthcare sectors further dilutes any potential concentration in the cyclical industries where the top holdings reside. With a low top-ten concentration of only 13.5% spread across disparate sectors including Technology and Real Estate, the fund appears to lack the structural coherence required for true thematic exposure. The portfolio's composition suggests it functions primarily as a diversified equity vehicle rather than a targeted strategy designed to capture specific market inefficiencies or trends implied by its designation.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-20 03:11:35.709906+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The VOE ETF exhibits a distinct sector weighting pattern that diverges significantly from the broad market capitalization weights of major indices, suggesting an investment thesis centered on value and income generation rather than growth momentum. The fund allocates substantial portions to Financial Services, Industrials, Energy, and Utilities, collectively representing nearly half of its portfolio, while maintaining notably lower exposures in high-growth sectors like Technology and Communication Services. This heavy tilt toward traditional industries implies a strategy designed to capture dividends from established businesses with mature business models, prioritizing stability over rapid expansion potential found in tech or consumer discretionary names.

Concentration risk within the fund appears moderate given that the top ten holdings account for only 13.5% of assets, indicating a broad diversification across many individual stocks rather than reliance on a few mega-cap leaders. However, sector concentration remains a defining characteristic; the significant overweight in Energy and Utilities positions the portfolio to be highly sensitive to commodity price fluctuations, interest rate environments, and regulatory changes specific to those industries. The presence of multiple holdings from sectors like Industrials and Consumer Defensive suggests an attempt to balance cyclical exposure with defensive characteristics, though the overall structure still leans heavily toward value-oriented factors rather than quality or low-volatility metrics typically associated with healthcare or communication services.

Ultimately, this allocation profile reveals a fund constructed for investors seeking exposure to dividend-paying companies in traditional economic drivers while accepting reduced participation in secular growth trends dominating recent market cycles. The relatively small representation of Technology and Communication Services further underscores a deliberate avoidance of volatility often found in these sectors, reinforcing the value-focused nature of the strategy without offering protection against sector-specific downturns within its heavily weighted areas like Energy or Financial Services.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 14:47:46.212677+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share VOE's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of VOE's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
VOVO$205B17099.6%
VTVVanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares$229B17099.6%
QUSQUS$1B16698.7%
VTIVanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares$2.1T0.03%16298.1%
VONEVONE$10B16196.9%

100% of VOE's portfolio by weight is also held by VO, which commands 6× more assets under management. When VO receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging VOE's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofVOE's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Replaces $249/yr Morningstar

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

18.9x
Weighted P/E
3.92x
Weighted P/B
1.99%
Dividend Yield
$48B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 95% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

0100020003000400078
Well Diversified
Top 5: 8.8%Top 10: 14.9%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Financial Services15.0%Industrials13.0%Energy12.8%Utilities12.1%Consumer Defensive7.9%Other7.2%Technology7.0%Real Estate6.0%Basic Materials5.8%Consumer Cyclical5.7%Healthcare5.4%Communication Services2.2%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
98% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
High Distress

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
7%
0–3 Weak
68%
4–6 Average
23%
7–9 Strong

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
136%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
0.00%
TTM Yield
At Risk
Dividend Durability
136% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside VOE collectively pay out 136% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. Warning: constituent companies are paying out nearly all cash flow. A wave of dividend cuts may be imminent if earnings decline. Based on 70% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+22.9%
ETF 1Y Return
+9.2%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+13.7%
Multiple Expansion
Earnings
P/E Inflation

VOE is up 22.9% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +9.2%. The remaining +13.7% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 97% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of VOE's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

31% Creators
69% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)27.8%
Value Destroyers61.3%

Of VOE's analyzed weight, 31% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 69% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 89% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

HIGH

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

52/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership15.7%
Most Crowded HoldingROP (48.0%)
Least CrowdedLNG (9.9%)
Coverage77% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

VOE has a Passive Crowding Score of 52/100. On average, 15.7% of the market capitalization of VOE's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 36 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration13.5%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1CMI
Cummins Inc.
Industrials
1.65%
33.6x5/9
2SLB
Schlumberger Ltd.
Energy
1.51%
24.0x4/9
3CRH
CRH plc
Basic Materials
1.41%
20.2x6/9
4VLO
Valero Energy Corp.
Energy
1.34%
17.9x6/9
5WDC
Western Digital Corp.
Technology
1.31%
31.8x6/9
6MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
Energy
1.30%
16.4x7/9
7PSX
Phillips 66
Energy
1.28%
17.4x6/9
8GM
General Motors Co.
Consumer Cyclical
1.24%
30.4x5/9
9DLR
Digital Realty Trust Inc.
Real Estate
1.23%
50.5x6/9
10BKR
Baker Hughes Co. Class A
Energy
1.22%
20.4x7/9
11WBD
Warner Bros Discovery Inc.
Communication Services
1.13%
93.0x7/9
12PCAR
PACCAR Inc.
Industrials
1.11%
23.5x4/9
13TEL
TE Connectivity plc
Technology
1.10%
21.8x5/9
14NEM
Newmont Goldcorp Corp.
Basic Materials
1.07%
14.2x9/9
15KEYS
Keysight Technologies Inc.
Technology
1.07%
54.3x4/9
The bottom 155 stocks in VOE account for only 81.0% of the total fund weight.Only the top 50 holdings are shown. Total holdings: 170.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how VOE’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-05-24

15 holdings · 19.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CMI1.65%900,323$604.1M
2SLB1.51%9,743,964$554.2M
3CRH1.41%4,354,487$515.7M
4VLO1.34%1,948,532$492.2M
5WDC1.31%1,104,629$480.0M
6MPC1.30%1,920,602$476.9M
7PSX1.28%2,611,351$467.8M
8GM1.24%5,890,484$452.9M
9DLR1.23%2,239,087$449.9M
10BKR1.22%6,439,607$448.6M
11WBD1.13%15,351,576$415.3M
12PCAR1.11%3,426,862$407.1M
13TEL1.10%1,912,092$404.7M
14NEM1.07%3,544,436$393.8M
15URI1.07%410,512$394.0M

2026-05-23

15 holdings · 19.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CMI1.65%900,323$604.1M
2SLB1.51%9,743,964$554.2M
3CRH1.41%4,354,487$515.7M
4VLO1.34%1,948,532$492.2M
5WDC1.31%1,104,629$480.0M
6MPC1.30%1,920,602$476.9M
7PSX1.28%2,611,351$467.8M
8GM1.24%5,890,484$452.9M
9DLR1.23%2,239,087$449.9M
10BKR1.22%6,439,607$448.6M
11WBD1.13%15,351,576$415.3M
12PCAR1.11%3,426,862$407.1M
13TEL1.10%1,912,092$404.7M
14URI1.07%410,512$394.0M
15NEM1.07%3,544,436$393.8M

2026-05-22

15 holdings · 19.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CMI1.65%900,323$604.1M
2SLB1.51%9,743,964$554.2M
3CRH1.41%4,354,487$515.7M
4VLO1.34%1,948,532$492.2M
5WDC1.31%1,104,629$480.0M
6MPC1.30%1,920,602$476.9M
7PSX1.28%2,611,351$467.8M
8GM1.24%5,890,484$452.9M
9DLR1.23%2,239,087$449.9M
10BKR1.22%6,439,607$448.6M
11WBD1.13%15,351,576$415.3M
12PCAR1.11%3,426,862$407.1M
13TEL1.10%1,912,092$404.7M
14NEM1.07%3,544,436$393.8M
15URI1.07%410,512$394.0M

2026-05-21

15 holdings · 19.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CMI1.65%900,323$604.1M
2SLB1.51%9,743,964$554.2M
3CRH1.41%4,354,487$515.7M
4VLO1.34%1,948,532$492.2M
5WDC1.31%1,104,629$480.0M
6MPC1.30%1,920,602$476.9M
7PSX1.28%2,611,351$467.8M
8GM1.24%5,890,484$452.9M
9DLR1.23%2,239,087$449.9M
10BKR1.22%6,439,607$448.6M
11WBD1.13%15,351,576$415.3M
12PCAR1.11%3,426,862$407.1M
13TEL1.10%1,912,092$404.7M
14NEM1.07%3,544,436$393.8M
15URI1.07%410,512$394.0M

2026-05-20

15 holdings · 19.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CMI1.65%900,323$604.1M
2SLB1.51%9,743,964$554.2M
3CRH1.41%4,354,487$515.7M
4VLO1.34%1,948,532$492.2M
5WDC1.31%1,104,629$480.0M
6MPC1.30%1,920,602$476.9M
7PSX1.28%2,611,351$467.8M
8GM1.24%5,890,484$452.9M
9DLR1.23%2,239,087$449.9M
10BKR1.22%6,439,607$448.6M
11WBD1.13%15,351,576$415.3M
12PCAR1.11%3,426,862$407.1M
13TEL1.10%1,912,092$404.7M
14KEYS1.07%1,119,493$391.7M
15URI1.07%410,512$394.0M

2026-05-19

15 holdings · 19.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CMI1.65%900,323$604.1M
2SLB1.51%9,743,964$554.2M
3CRH1.41%4,354,487$515.7M
4VLO1.34%1,948,532$492.2M
5WDC1.31%1,104,629$480.0M
6MPC1.30%1,920,602$476.9M
7PSX1.28%2,611,351$467.8M
8GM1.24%5,890,484$452.9M
9DLR1.23%2,239,087$449.9M
10BKR1.22%6,439,607$448.6M
11WBD1.13%15,351,576$415.3M
12PCAR1.11%3,426,862$407.1M
13TEL1.10%1,912,092$404.7M
14URI1.07%410,512$394.0M
15KEYS1.07%1,119,493$391.7M

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

16.1%
Annual Volatility
1.60
Sharpe (1Y)
0.75
Sharpe (3Y)
-18.4%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-19.7%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove VOE Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+0.88%(2026-06-02)

Top Contributors

+0.077%
+0.043%
+0.036%

Top Detractors

-0.012%
-0.014%
-0.014%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.00%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How VOE’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-05-2456 snapshots
Financial Services15.0%
Industrials13.0%
Energy12.8%
Utilities12.1%
Consumer Defensive7.9%
Other7.2%
Technology7.0%
Real Estate6.0%
Basic Materials5.8%
Consumer Cyclical5.7%
Healthcare5.4%
Communication Services2.2%
Change since 2026-03-30
Energy
+1.9%
Technology
-1.5%
Other
+1.1%
Basic Materials
-1.0%
Financial Services
+0.8%
Consumer Cyclical
-0.6%
2026-03-302026-05-24

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.