Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 19.1x earnings — a 71% discount to the sector average of 65.2x — ADUS is in the lower valuation range. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedAddus HomeCare Corporation demonstrates robust fundamental quality, evidenced by a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.29, which collectively signal strong financial health with low earnings manipulation risk. The company's return on invested capital stands at 8.6%, driven primarily by exceptional revenue growth of 23.2% year-over-year rather than leverage or margin expansion; while the net margin sits at a modest 6.7% against a gross margin of 32.5%, this structure suggests an asset-light model where top-line scaling is the primary engine for value creation, though the ROIC remains below typical high-quality compounders due to limited capital efficiency gains from leverage or operational leverage.
Valuation metrics present a significant divergence between current pricing and intrinsic worth. Trading at 19.1x forward earnings, ADUS commands less than half the multiple of its sector average of 38.5x, indicating the market may be undervaluing the firm relative to peers despite its superior growth trajectory. This compression is further highlighted by a discounted cash flow analysis implying a fair value of $79, suggesting current prices are materially below estimated intrinsic worth based on projected cash flows and implied growth assumptions inherent in the DCF model.
The risk-reward profile appears skewed toward upside potential given the wide gap between market pricing and DCF-derived valuations. However, investors must weigh the modest ROIC against the high revenue velocity; while the low valuation multiple offers a margin of safety relative to sector norms, the lack of leverage-driven returns limits downside protection through balance sheet strength compared to more capital-intensive peers. The combination of strong earnings quality scores and a discount to historical or peer valuations creates an asymmetric setup where realized alpha would depend on whether future growth rates can sustain current multiples as they expand toward sector averages.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $95 | $71 | $56 |
| 3% | $111 | $79 | $61 |
| 4% | $134 | $89 | $66 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $79 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XHS or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ADUS shares regardless of Addus HomeCare Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $29M of passive capital is structurally linked to ADUS through 6 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ADUS's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Addus HomeCare Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with ADUS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ADUS Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ADUS Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ADUS Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Addus HomeCare Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Addus HomeCare Corporation converts 66% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | 5 | $99.57 | $497.85 |
| 2026-05-06 | 40 | $98.44 | $3,937.6 |
| 2026-04-29 | 50 | $98.84 | $4,942 |
| 2026-04-13 | 1 | $92.21 | $92.21 |
| 2026-04-09 | 10 | $92.30 | $923 |
| 2026-04-08 | 63 | $93.15 | $5,868.45 |
| 2026-04-06 | 37 | $91.59 | $3,388.83 |
| 2026-04-01 | 699 | $93.65 | $65,461.35 |
| 2026-03-27 | 54 | $97.67 | $5,274.18 |
| 2026-03-26 | 4,660 | $99.32 | $462,831.2 |
| 2026-03-23 | 9 | $99.28 | $893.52 |
| 2026-03-19 | 194 | $101.55 | $19,700.7 |
| 2026-03-12 | 2,809 | $103.05 | $289,467.45 |
| 2026-03-11 | 798 | $102.15 | $81,515.7 |
| 2026-03-09 | 8 | $103.21 | $825.68 |
| 2026-02-27 | 2,053 | $104.02 | $213,553.06 |
| 2026-02-17 | 90 | $113.80 | $10,242 |
| 2026-02-06 | 14,079 | $106.58 | $1.5M |
| 2026-02-04 | 47 | $106.90 | $5,024.3 |
| 2026-02-03 | 6 | $105.32 | $631.92 |
| 2026-01-16 | 41 | $109.80 | $4,501.8 |
| 2025-12-22 | 6 | $112.82 | $676.92 |
| 2025-12-19 | 49 | $112.07 | $5,491.43 |
| 2025-12-18 | 18 | $112.98 | $2,033.64 |
| 2025-12-02 | 136 | $120.84 | $16,434.24 |
| 2025-11-26 | 624 | $120.49 | $75,185.76 |
| 2025-11-24 | 34 | $112.70 | $3,831.8 |
| 2025-11-21 | 319 | $110.07 | $35,112.33 |
| 2025-11-17 | 5,210 | $109.07 | $568,254.7 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ADUS to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.