ETF · Broad Market

XHS(XHS)

$135.77
+0.31%
Expense Ratio
$82M
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
97.8%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards healthcare, with a 51.9% weighting, indicating a significant focus on this industry. The remaining sectors are relatively underrepresented, with financial services comprising just 1.6%. From a geographic perspective, there is no explicit information provided to suggest any notable regional biases.

Concentration risk is present due to the top holdings, which account for a combined 14% of the portfolio. HNGE and LFST lead the way among these holdings, each representing around 2.2% of the fund's assets. The sector mix diverges from the broader market, with healthcare dominating this ETF while being a smaller component in many global indices. A favorable macro environment for this portfolio might be one characterized by sustained growth in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors. Conversely, an unfavorable environment could arise if investors become increasingly risk-averse or if regulatory headwinds impact the industry's performance.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 10:07:11.981009+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 85/100

The XHS ETF demonstrates a strong thematic alignment with its healthcare focus, as the vast majority of top holdings are explicitly categorized within that sector. Holdings such as UnitedHealth Group, CVS Health, and Centene Corporation represent core components of the broader healthcare ecosystem, reinforcing the fund's stated objective rather than diluting it with unrelated industries. While a small portion of positions like PGNY and MD lack specific sector tags in this data snapshot, they do not appear to deviate significantly from the medical theme given their common association with health services or technology within that domain. The portfolio avoids over-reliance on mega-cap stabilization by maintaining a diversified list of thirty holdings where no single entity dominates the top ten concentration at 26.1%, suggesting an effort to capture sector-wide trends rather than betting heavily on individual large-cap performance.

Sector coherence is further evidenced by the weight distribution, with healthcare comprising nearly fifty-eight percent of the portfolio while financial services remain a minor component at two percent. This structure indicates that the fund maintains distinct differentiation from broad market indices without relying on heavy exposure to non-healthcare sectors to balance returns. The concentration risk appears manageable given the spread across thirty holdings and the relatively low weightings in individual top positions, which reduces vulnerability to idiosyncratic stock-specific volatility. Although the total assets under management are modest at zero point one billion dollars, the internal composition reflects a disciplined adherence to sector boundaries. Investors may observe that this approach provides exposure to healthcare dynamics without the dilution often seen in thematic funds forced to include unrelated sectors for diversification purposes.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 19:03:30.646975+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The fund exhibits an exceptionally high concentration within the Healthcare sector, which accounts for nearly 58% of its total assets. This overwhelming allocation suggests a clear investment thesis centered on exposure to biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies rather than a diversified market approach. The presence of only one holding in Financial Services further underscores this narrow focus, indicating that the strategy prioritizes specific industry dynamics over broad economic diversification or defensive positioning across other major sectors like technology or consumer staples.

This sector-specific heavy weighting introduces significant idiosyncratic risk, as the fund's performance will be almost entirely dependent on the regulatory environment and clinical trial outcomes within healthcare. The top five holdings collectively represent a substantial portion of the portfolio, with four out of the five being Healthcare entities, reinforcing that the majority of capital is deployed into companies facing similar volatility drivers such as drug approval timelines or patent cliffs. Notably, one of the top positions falls outside the primary sector classification, yet it remains embedded within this highly concentrated framework, potentially adding a layer of complexity to the fund's risk profile without offering true diversification benefits.

The data reveals a distinct tilt toward small-to-mid-cap growth characteristics often found in biotech and medtech firms rather than large-cap stability or value factors. With nearly 30 holdings allocated almost exclusively to healthcare, the portfolio lacks the breadth required to mitigate single-stock failures within that industry. Consequently, any adverse developments specific to this sector could disproportionately impact the fund's overall returns, while positive catalysts in biotechnology would likely be amplified significantly compared to a more balanced index strategy.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 01:45:12.700908+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share XHS's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of XHS's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
VHTVHT$19B5694.9%
SPTMSPTM$12B4172.0%
ONEOONEO$25M2134.4%
VBKVBK$40B1833.0%
SPSMSPSM$14B1832.2%

95% of XHS's portfolio by weight is also held by VHT, which commands 229× more assets under management. When VHT receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging XHS's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofXHS's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

22.8x
Weighted P/E
3.08x
Weighted P/B
$22B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 69% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000175
Well Diversified
Top 5: 11.0%Top 10: 20.7%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Healthcare52.1%Other46.3%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
97% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
Low Risk

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
11%
0–3 Weak
60%
4–6 Average
26%
7–9 Strong

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
28%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
0.00%
TTM Yield
Very Safe
Dividend Durability
28% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside XHS collectively pay out 28% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 31% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+49.6%
ETF 1Y Return
+13.5%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+36.1%
Multiple Expansion
Earnings
P/E Inflation

XHS is up 49.6% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +13.5%. The remaining +36.1% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 86% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of XHS's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

48% Creators
52% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)17.3%
Value Destroyers19.0%

Of XHS's analyzed weight, 48% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 52% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 36% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

LOW

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

22/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership6.7%
Most Crowded HoldingBTSG (16.4%)
Least CrowdedAVAH (0.2%)
Coverage74% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

XHS has a low Passive Crowding Score of 22/100. On average, 6.7% of the market capitalization of XHS's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates relatively low passive crowding — the underlying stocks have ample active-market liquidity to absorb ETF-driven flows without significant price distortion.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration20.7%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1LFST
LIFESTANCE HEALTH GROUP INC
2.30%
376.5x
2ACHC
ACADIA HEALTHCARE CO INC
Healthcare
2.25%
3HNGE
HINGE HEALTH INC A
2.22%
4PACS
PACS GROUP INC
2.13%
27.0x
5NEO
NEOGENOMICS INC
2.11%
6PGNY
PROGYNY INC
1.97%
28.6x
7ADUS
ADDUS HOMECARE CORP
Healthcare
1.96%
19.1x
8HIMS
HIMS + HERS HEALTH INC
1.94%
53.7x
9THC
TENET HEALTHCARE CORP
1.94%
12.3x5/9
10CON
CONCENTRA GROUP HOLDINGS PAR
Healthcare
1.91%
17.3x
11PRVA
PRIVIA HEALTH GROUP INC
1.91%
138.1x
12GH
GUARDANT HEALTH INC
1.90%
5/9
13USPH
U.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY INC
1.89%
50.6x
14DVA
DAVITA INC
Healthcare
1.89%
22.5x6/9
15SGRY
SURGERY PARTNERS INC
1.88%
The bottom 46 stocks in XHS account for only 69.8% of the total fund weight.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how XHS’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-07-19

15 holdings · 30.2% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1LFST2.30%427,758
2ACHC2.25%140,609
3HNGE2.22%54,193
4PACS2.13%97,942
5NEO2.11%298,061
6PGNY1.97%129,872
7ADUS1.96%36,094
8HIMS1.94%121,034
9THC1.94%20,419
10CON1.91%126,345
11PRVA1.91%146,813
12GH1.90%25,726
13USPH1.89%53,504
14DVA1.89%16,910
15SGRY1.88%236,790

2026-07-18

15 holdings · 30.2% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1LFST2.30%427,758
2ACHC2.25%140,609
3HNGE2.22%54,193
4PACS2.13%97,942
5NEO2.11%298,061
6PGNY1.97%129,872
7ADUS1.96%36,094
8HIMS1.94%121,034
9THC1.94%20,419
10CON1.91%126,345
11PRVA1.91%146,813
12GH1.90%25,726
13USPH1.89%53,504
14DVA1.89%16,910
15SGRY1.88%236,790

2026-07-17

15 holdings · 30.5% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1LFST2.25%424,998
2HNGE2.23%53,843
3ACHC2.18%139,702
4HIMS2.16%120,253
5PACS2.11%97,310
6NEO2.07%296,138
7PGNY2.01%129,034
8GH2.01%25,560
9PRVA1.98%145,866
10WGS1.96%61,484
11ASTH1.96%86,248
12ADUS1.91%35,861
13MOH1.90%16,895
14THC1.88%20,287
15DVA1.88%16,801

2026-07-16

15 holdings · 30.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1HNGE2.33%53,843
2LFST2.22%424,998
3ACHC2.14%139,702
4PACS2.12%97,310
5HIMS2.05%120,253
6ASTH2.05%86,248
7NEO2.04%296,138
8PGNY2.02%129,034
9GH1.98%25,560
10PRVA1.98%145,866
11MOH1.98%16,895
12DVA1.89%16,801
13ADUS1.89%35,861
14CON1.88%125,530
15BTSG1.86%55,133

2026-07-15

15 holdings · 30.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1HNGE2.33%53,843
2LFST2.23%424,998
3ACHC2.06%139,702
4PACS2.03%97,310
5NEO2.01%296,138
6HIMS1.99%120,253
7PGNY1.99%129,034
8ASTH1.98%86,248
9MOH1.98%16,895
10PRVA1.96%145,866
11GH1.95%25,560
12DVA1.91%16,801
13THC1.90%20,287
14CON1.90%125,530
15WGS1.89%61,484

2026-07-14

15 holdings · 30.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1HNGE2.30%53,843
2LFST2.19%424,998
3ACHC2.11%139,702
4PACS2.03%97,310
5NEO2.01%296,138
6THC2.00%20,287
7HIMS1.99%120,253
8GH1.97%25,560
9ASTH1.95%86,248
10WGS1.95%61,484
11PRVA1.93%145,866
12CON1.91%125,530
13PGNY1.91%129,034
14MOH1.90%16,895
15BTSG1.90%55,133

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

20.9%
Annual Volatility
1.93
Sharpe (1Y)
0.55
Sharpe (3Y)
-17.8%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-32.6%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove XHS Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+0.31%(2026-07-17)

Top Contributors

+0.072%
+0.063%
+0.060%

Top Detractors

-0.009%
-0.013%
-0.063%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.00%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How XHS’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-07-1994 snapshots
Healthcare52.1%
Other46.3%
Financial Services1.6%
Change since 2026-03-30
Other
+4.2%
Healthcare
-3.7%
Financial Services
-0.4%
2026-03-302026-07-19

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.