XHS(XHS)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe portfolio's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards healthcare, with a significant presence in other sectors, but minimal exposure to financial services. The top holdings are concentrated within the healthcare space, with several biotech and pharmaceutical companies making up a substantial portion of the fund's assets.
Concentration risk appears elevated due to the high degree of single-stock dominance among the top holdings. The sector mix is more heavily weighted towards healthcare than the broader market, which may be favorable in an environment where healthcare stocks are outperforming other sectors. However, this also means that a downturn in the healthcare sector could have a disproportionate impact on the fund's performance.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 20:14:06.393622+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 85/100The XHS ETF demonstrates a strong thematic alignment with its healthcare focus, as the vast majority of top holdings are explicitly categorized within that sector. Holdings such as UnitedHealth Group, CVS Health, and Centene Corporation represent core components of the broader healthcare ecosystem, reinforcing the fund's stated objective rather than diluting it with unrelated industries. While a small portion of positions like PGNY and MD lack specific sector tags in this data snapshot, they do not appear to deviate significantly from the medical theme given their common association with health services or technology within that domain. The portfolio avoids over-reliance on mega-cap stabilization by maintaining a diversified list of thirty holdings where no single entity dominates the top ten concentration at 26.1%, suggesting an effort to capture sector-wide trends rather than betting heavily on individual large-cap performance.
Sector coherence is further evidenced by the weight distribution, with healthcare comprising nearly fifty-eight percent of the portfolio while financial services remain a minor component at two percent. This structure indicates that the fund maintains distinct differentiation from broad market indices without relying on heavy exposure to non-healthcare sectors to balance returns. The concentration risk appears manageable given the spread across thirty holdings and the relatively low weightings in individual top positions, which reduces vulnerability to idiosyncratic stock-specific volatility. Although the total assets under management are modest at zero point one billion dollars, the internal composition reflects a disciplined adherence to sector boundaries. Investors may observe that this approach provides exposure to healthcare dynamics without the dilution often seen in thematic funds forced to include unrelated sectors for diversification purposes.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 19:03:30.646975+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe fund exhibits an exceptionally high concentration within the Healthcare sector, which accounts for nearly 58% of its total assets. This overwhelming allocation suggests a clear investment thesis centered on exposure to biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies rather than a diversified market approach. The presence of only one holding in Financial Services further underscores this narrow focus, indicating that the strategy prioritizes specific industry dynamics over broad economic diversification or defensive positioning across other major sectors like technology or consumer staples.
This sector-specific heavy weighting introduces significant idiosyncratic risk, as the fund's performance will be almost entirely dependent on the regulatory environment and clinical trial outcomes within healthcare. The top five holdings collectively represent a substantial portion of the portfolio, with four out of the five being Healthcare entities, reinforcing that the majority of capital is deployed into companies facing similar volatility drivers such as drug approval timelines or patent cliffs. Notably, one of the top positions falls outside the primary sector classification, yet it remains embedded within this highly concentrated framework, potentially adding a layer of complexity to the fund's risk profile without offering true diversification benefits.
The data reveals a distinct tilt toward small-to-mid-cap growth characteristics often found in biotech and medtech firms rather than large-cap stability or value factors. With nearly 30 holdings allocated almost exclusively to healthcare, the portfolio lacks the breadth required to mitigate single-stock failures within that industry. Consequently, any adverse developments specific to this sector could disproportionately impact the fund's overall returns, while positive catalysts in biotechnology would likely be amplified significantly compared to a more balanced index strategy.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 01:45:12.700908+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share XHS's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of XHS's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VHTVHT | $19B | — | 56 | 98.4% |
| SPTMSPTM | $12B | — | 42 | 77.6% |
| ONEOONEO | $25M | — | 20 | 37.4% |
| SPSMSPSM | $14B | — | 20 | 36.1% |
| ESGVESGV | $11B | — | 17 | 33.0% |
98% of XHS's portfolio by weight is also held by VHT, which commands 229× more assets under management. When VHT receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging XHS's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofXHS's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 73% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside XHS collectively pay out 33% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 35% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryXHS is up 16.3% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +2.5%. The remaining +13.7% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 91% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of XHS's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of XHS's analyzed weight, 46% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 54% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 42% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
LOWHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
XHS has a low Passive Crowding Score of 22/100. On average, 6.7% of the market capitalization of XHS's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates relatively low passive crowding — the underlying stocks have ample active-market liquidity to absorb ETF-driven flows without significant price distortion.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 31 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HUM | HUMANA INC Healthcare | 3.19% | 32.6x | 3/9 |
| 2 | CLOV | CLOVER HEALTH INVESTMENTS CO Healthcare | 2.91% | — | — |
| 3 | CNC | CENTENE CORP Healthcare | 2.90% | — | 3/9 |
| 4 | PGNY | PROGYNY INC | 2.53% | 28.6x | — |
| 5 | BTSG | BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES Healthcare | 2.52% | 87.0x | 7/9 |
| 6 | ELV | ELEVANCE HEALTH INC Healthcare | 2.42% | 16.7x | 4/9 |
| 7 | UNH | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC Healthcare | 2.41% | 28.7x | 6/9 |
| 8 | GH | GUARDANT HEALTH INC | 2.41% | — | 5/9 |
| 9 | ASTH | ASTRANA HEALTH INC Healthcare | 2.40% | 75.8x | — |
| 10 | DVA | DAVITA INC Healthcare | 2.31% | 18.7x | 6/9 |
| 11 | MOH | MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC Healthcare | 2.22% | 46.4x | 4/9 |
| 12 | CVS | CVS HEALTH CORP Healthcare | 2.21% | 39.9x | 6/9 |
| 13 | CRVL | CORVEL CORP Financial Services | 2.09% | 28.2x | — |
| 14 | CON | CONCENTRA GROUP HOLDINGS PAR Healthcare | 2.05% | 17.3x | — |
| 15 | HQY | HEALTHEQUITY INC | 1.98% | 34.0x | — |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how XHS’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 36.5% tracked weight2026-05-23
15 holdings · 36.5% tracked weight2026-05-22
15 holdings · 36.7% tracked weight2026-05-21
15 holdings · 36.6% tracked weight2026-05-20
15 holdings · 36.5% tracked weight2026-05-19
15 holdings · 36.6% tracked weightSource: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove XHS Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How XHS’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.