Financial Services

American Financial Group, Inc. (AFG)

$10.5B
Market Cap
12.6
P/E Ratio
0.67
Beta
2.80%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Altman Z 0.7 DistressROIC−WACC -5.5%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 12.6x earnings — a 35% discount to the sector average of 19.2x — AFG is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 0.7.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of American Financial Group reveal a company generating returns primarily through financial leverage rather than operational efficiency or asset productivity. While the DuPont decomposition shows an ROE of 17.5% driven significantly by an equity multiplier of 6.77x, this is counterbalanced by a modest net margin of 10.4% and low asset turnover of 0.25x, alongside a compressed ROIC-WACC spread at just 2.8%. This capital structure suggests that profitability relies heavily on debt financing rather than high-margin operations or rapid asset cycling. Furthermore, the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals moderate financial health, reinforced by recent revenue contraction of -1.9% year-over-year, indicating potential headwinds in core business segments despite the elevated return on equity.

Valuation metrics present a distinct divergence between current market pricing and historical or sector norms. Trading at a P/E ratio of 12.6x, the stock is priced approximately 31% below its peer group average of 18.3x, suggesting the market may be discounting future prospects relative to industry standards. However, this valuation gap must be weighed against deteriorating top-line growth and a subpar fundamental score, which often limits multiple expansion potential in financial services. Without explicit DCF inputs or implied growth assumptions provided, the low multiple reflects a risk-adjusted price that already incorporates concerns about margin sustainability and revenue stagnation rather than an undervalued opportunity based on superior fundamentals alone.

Risk indicators further complicate the investment thesis, highlighted by significant insider activity showing $222,346 in net selling over the last 90 days. This internal disposition of shares coincides with a declining F-Score and negative revenue momentum, suggesting insiders may be hedging against near-term volatility or anticipating continued operational challenges. The combination of low ROIC efficiency, shrinking revenues, and insider outflows creates a scenario where downside risks appear to outweigh the attractive valuation multiple, leaving the risk-reward profile heavily dependent on whether margin expansion can offset the lack of revenue growth in subsequent quarters.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

12.6x
AFG P/E
19.2x
Sector Avg
-35%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
0.7
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

10.4%
Net Margin
2.8%
ROIC
8.3%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -5.5%— Negative spread.
-1.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-5.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

10.4%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.25x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
6.77x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
17.5%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

5.77x
Debt / Equity
14.4x
Interest Coverage
0.1x
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.2B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
$-222,346
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
1
Sale Transactions
2026-02-27HERTZMAN BRIAN S.Sold 2/7 qtrsSale$222,346
2026-02-26GILLIS MICHELLE AGrant3,012 shares
2026-02-26HERTZMAN BRIAN S.Sold 2/7 qtrsGrant3,163 shares
2026-02-26THOMPSON DAVID LAWRENCE JRGrant4,706 shares
2026-02-26WEISS MARK A.Grant3,012 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $2.07
Act: $1.81
-12.7%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $2.10
Act: $2.14
+1.7%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $2.51
Act: $2.69
+7.2%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $3.31
Act: $3.65
+10.1%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

10.5
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
2.19
Price/Book
654652
Avg Volume
$150.02
52W High
$114.73
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$786M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding AFG
0.13%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$617B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like KIE or SDY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell AFG shares regardless of American Financial Group, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $786M of passive capital is structurally linked to AFG through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on AFG's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in American Financial Group, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

AFG Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
AFGEpicenterVBETFVIGETFVYMETFUNMHigh RiskRGAHigh RiskFNFHigh RiskOSCRUnknownAFLHigh Risk
AFG Price Drop (%)0

If American Financial Group, Inc. (AFG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies UNUM GROUP (UNM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with AFG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 17 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

AFG Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
AFG

Float lock-up computed from 17 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-06104$131.63$13,689.52
2026-05-0516$131.40$2,102.4
2026-04-3035$129.42$4,529.7
2026-04-2846$129.55$5,959.3
2026-03-315$127.14$635.7
2026-03-2749$128.93$6,317.57
2026-03-262,263$126.85$287,061.55
2026-03-231$124.18$124.18
2026-03-2019$124.47$2,364.93
2026-02-27448$133.35$59,740.8
2026-02-185$131.10$655.5
2026-02-061$129.68$129.68
2026-01-262,800$127.79$357,812
2025-12-22974$137.46$133,886.04
2025-12-0968$132.38$9,001.84
2025-11-2060$136.76$8,205.6
2025-11-13110$142.05$15,625.5
2025-10-21174$130.57$22,719.18

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare AFG to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.