Assurant, Inc. (AIZ)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 12.8x earnings — a 34% discount to the sector average of 19.2x — AIZ is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 0.9.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedAssurant presents a capital-efficient earnings profile driven primarily by financial leverage rather than operational efficiency or asset generation. The DuPont decomposition reveals that the 14.9% return on equity is sustained almost entirely through an equity multiplier of 6.18x, while returns on invested capital remain subdued at just 2.6%, indicating a significant gap between the cost of capital and the actual economic yield generated by assets. Despite this leverage-heavy structure, the balance sheet exhibits moderate stability with a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, supported by healthy fundamentals including a net margin expansion to 6.8% and robust revenue growth of 7.9%.
Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing in limited upside relative to intrinsic value models, as the current P/E multiple of 12.8x trades at a substantial discount to both historical norms and the sector average of 18.3x. This compression aligns with discounted cash flow analyses that imply a fair value significantly higher than current levels; however, such wide gaps often reflect heightened uncertainty regarding future growth sustainability or margin durability rather than an immediate undervaluation opportunity. The divergence between low multiple pricing and elevated DCF targets indicates the market may be discounting potential risks inherent in the company's high-leverage operating model more heavily than long-term cash flow projections justify.
Recent insider activity adds a layer of caution to the risk-reward assessment, with $558,331 in net selling observed over the last 90 days. While this does not definitively signal distress given the strong revenue trajectory and reasonable profitability margins, it introduces noise into the fundamental narrative that quantitative models must weigh against the attractive valuation spread. The combination of a low ROIC-WACC spread, insider outflows, and leverage-dependent returns creates a complex risk profile where downside protection relies heavily on maintaining current margin levels without significant balance sheet deleveraging.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.5% | 9.5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $2036 | $1436 | $1027 |
| 3% | $2654 | $1713 | $1159 |
| 4% | $3890 | $2147 | $1338 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $1713 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like KIE or SDY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell AIZ shares regardless of Assurant, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.6B of passive capital is structurally linked to AIZ through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Assurant, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Assurant, Inc. (AIZ) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORP (CINF) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with AIZ. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 24 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
AIZ Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest AIZ Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 24 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
AIZ Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Assurant, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Assurant, Inc. converts 110% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-4.9%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 3,122 | $242.61 | $757,428.42 |
| 2026-05-12 | 436 | $244.14 | $106,445.04 |
| 2026-05-07 | 5 | $236.61 | $1,183.05 |
| 2026-05-04 | 2 | $231.51 | $463.02 |
| 2026-04-20 | 490 | $227.76 | $111,602.4 |
| 2026-04-16 | 9,700 | $224.01 | $2.2M |
| 2026-04-13 | 9,587 | $219.40 | $2.1M |
| 2026-04-10 | 22,638 | $223.28 | $5.1M |
| 2026-04-09 | 2,073 | $223.69 | $463,709.37 |
| 2026-04-08 | 19,018 | $218.80 | $4.2M |
| 2026-04-07 | 20,000 | $217.99 | $4.4M |
| 2026-04-06 | 30,000 | $218.26 | $6.5M |
| 2026-04-01 | 40 | $217.81 | $8,712.4 |
| 2026-03-30 | 1,861 | $213.28 | $396,914.08 |
| 2026-03-25 | 5 | $217.52 | $1,087.6 |
| 2026-03-23 | 1 | $212.81 | $212.81 |
| 2026-03-18 | 2 | $217.32 | $434.64 |
| 2026-03-17 | 1,130 | $222.15 | $251,029.5 |
| 2026-03-16 | 1,065 | $218.53 | $232,734.45 |
| 2026-03-06 | 168 | $227.18 | $38,166.24 |
| 2026-03-05 | 1,029 | $231.95 | $238,676.55 |
| 2026-03-02 | 2 | $229.59 | $459.18 |
| 2026-02-23 | 6,147 | $224.31 | $1.4M |
| 2026-02-20 | 1,709 | $222.92 | $380,970.28 |
| 2026-02-17 | 1 | $217.48 | $217.48 |
| 2026-02-13 | 1 | $214.48 | $214.48 |
| 2026-02-12 | 3,675 | $216.01 | $793,836.75 |
| 2026-02-05 | 839 | $241.31 | $202,459.09 |
| 2026-02-02 | 13,860 | $238.13 | $3.3M |
| 2026-01-28 | 4 | $237.05 | $948.2 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare AIZ to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.