ETF · Broad Market

ONEV(ONEV)

$146.46
-0.45%
Expense Ratio
$522M
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
90.4%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation suggests a moderate tilt towards financial services, which is slightly more pronounced than the broader market average. The presence of multiple insurance companies in the top holdings list, including ALL, TRV, and HIG, reinforces this observation. Additionally, the inclusion of several healthcare names, such as MCK and CI, contributes to the fund's diversified sector mix.

The weighted P/E ratio of 16.4x indicates that the portfolio is trading at a premium multiple relative to its earnings growth prospects. The weighted P/B ratio of 5.93x suggests a relatively high valuation posture compared to book value. Concentration risk is somewhat mitigated by the presence of ten distinct sector representatives among the top holdings, although the fund's largest holding, ALL, does account for approximately 1.5% of the portfolio. A favorable macro environment would likely be one characterized by stable interest rates and moderate economic growth, which could support the financial services and healthcare sectors.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 09:55:07.070019+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 15/100

The investment theme implied by the ticker ONEV suggests a singular, cohesive focus on energy or technology sectors, yet the actual portfolio composition reveals a stark divergence from such a narrow definition. The top holdings list includes significant positions in healthcare providers like CAH and MCK alongside financial services firms ACGL and TROW, which are entirely unrelated to an energy or tech-centric narrative. Furthermore, while the name might imply exposure to volatile growth sectors, the fund exhibits no over-reliance on mega-cap stocks; instead, it maintains a highly diversified structure with individual top holdings capped at approximately 1.6%, indicating that broad-market names are not being used merely as stabilizers but rather reflecting a genuine attempt at wide dispersion across unrelated industries.

Sector coherence analysis indicates that the fund functions more like an ultra-broad market index than a thematic vehicle, lacking clear differentiation from standard benchmarks. The sector breakdown shows substantial weightings in Industrials and Consumer Cyclical sectors alongside Healthcare and Utilities, creating a fragmented profile where no single industry dominates or aligns with a specific name-based thesis. With exposure spread across twelve distinct sectors including Real Estate, Basic Materials, and Energy at mere 1%, the portfolio fails to demonstrate the concentrated risk usually associated with thematic investing. The low top-ten concentration of 9.5% reinforces this observation, suggesting that returns are likely driven by general market movements rather than specific sectoral outperformance or a unified strategic theme.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 19:05:05.603666+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The sector allocation of ONEV reveals a distinct divergence from the broader market, characterized by significant underweightings in Growth and Cyclical sectors relative to Defensive and Income-oriented industries. With Industrials comprising nearly 13% of assets followed closely by Healthcare at over 10%, the fund establishes a foundational bias toward established economic drivers rather than high-growth technology or speculative energy plays. This structure is further reinforced by substantial positions in Utilities, Financial Services, and Consumer Defensives, each holding between 7% and nearly 8%. The notably low exposure to Technology at just over 5% and Energy at merely 1% suggests the investment thesis prioritizes stability and predictable cash flows over capital appreciation driven by rapid innovation or commodity cycles.

Regarding concentration risk, the portfolio exhibits a deliberate dispersion strategy despite its heavy reliance on specific defensive sectors. Although Industrials and Healthcare dominate the weightings, the presence of these categories does not result in extreme single-name exposure; instead, the fund holds 53 industrial names and 27 healthcare entities respectively. This broad distribution within top sectors helps mitigate idiosyncratic risk associated with individual company performance. The low Top-10 concentration metric of 9.5% indicates that no small group of stocks dictates the majority of portfolio movements, implying a reliance on sector-level beta rather than alpha generation from a handful of large-cap winners.

The factor tilts inherent in this allocation point toward value and quality characteristics while actively avoiding volatility associated with growth factors. By minimizing Communication Services and Energy, the fund reduces sensitivity to consumer discretionary spending swings and macroeconomic inflation shocks tied to fossil fuels. Conversely, the heavy weighting in Utilities and Consumer Defensives introduces a natural hedge against economic downturns, as these sectors often maintain demand during periods of recessionary pressure. The inclusion of Financial Services adds leverage potential but also ties performance closely to interest rate environments. Ultimately, this configuration constructs a portfolio designed for capital preservation and steady income generation rather than aggressive total return chasing in volatile market conditions.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 10:12:11.185986+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share ONEV's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of ONEV's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
ONEOONEO$25M44899.7%
SPTMSPTM$12B41695.3%
VONVVONV$18B22869.4%
SPLGSPLG$97B21466.9%
SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust$640B0.09%20766.9%

100% of ONEV's portfolio by weight is also held by ONEO. When ONEO receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging ONEV's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofONEV's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

16.6x
Weighted P/E
6.06x
Weighted P/B
$28B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 89% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

0100020003000400036
Well Diversified
Top 5: 5.4%Top 10: 9.2%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Other28.4%Financial Services11.4%Industrials10.2%Healthcare9.2%Consumer Defensive7.8%Consumer Cyclical7.7%Utilities7.2%Real Estate7.2%Technology4.6%Communication Services2.3%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
72% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
High Distress

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
2%
0–3 Weak
46%
4–6 Average
25%
7–9 Strong

Based on 72% of fund weight with Piotroski data.

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
104%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
0.00%
TTM Yield
At Risk
Dividend Durability
104% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside ONEV collectively pay out 104% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. Warning: constituent companies are paying out nearly all cash flow. A wave of dividend cuts may be imminent if earnings decline. Based on 51% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+14.6%
ETF 1Y Return
+19.3%
Wtd Earnings Growth
-4.6%
Multiple Contraction
Earnings

ONEV is up 14.6% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +19.3%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 4.6% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 70% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of ONEV's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

54% Creators
46% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)35.2%
Value Destroyers29.9%

Of ONEV's analyzed weight, 54% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 46% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 65% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

46/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership13.9%
Most Crowded HoldingDTE (25.9%)
Least CrowdedBJ (5.3%)
Coverage46% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

ONEV has a Passive Crowding Score of 46/100. On average, 13.9% of the market capitalization of ONEV's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 41 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration9.2%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1ALL
ALLSTATE CORP
Financial Services
1.45%
5.3x4/9
2PGR
PROGRESSIVE CORP
Financial Services
1.13%
10.3x5/9
3MCK
MCKESSON CORP
Healthcare
1.03%
21.9x5/9
4ACGL
ARCH CAPITAL GROUP LTD
Financial Services
0.92%
7.7x5/9
5CI
THE CIGNA GROUP
Healthcare
0.88%
12.0x6/9
6TRV
TRAVELERS COS INC/THE
Financial Services
0.79%
10.1x4/9
7KR
KROGER CO
Consumer Defensive
0.76%
34.2x6/9
8CINF
CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORP
Financial Services
0.76%
10.1x4/9
9HIG
HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP INC
Financial Services
0.75%
9.6x7/9
10TROW
T ROWE PRICE GROUP INC
Financial Services
0.72%
12.8x4/9
11CMCSA
COMCAST CORP CLASS A
Communication Services
0.71%
4.7x8/9
12SPG
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP INC
Real Estate
0.69%
15.9x4/9
13MRSH
MARSH + MCLENNAN COS
Financial Services
0.68%
22.8x6/9
14ADM
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND CO
Consumer Defensive
0.63%
37.0x4/9
15ELV
ELEVANCE HEALTH INC
Healthcare
0.60%
16.5x4/9
The bottom 436 stocks in ONEV account for only 87.5% of the total fund weight.Only the top 50 holdings are shown. Total holdings: 451.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how ONEV’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-07-18

15 holdings · 12.5% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1ALL1.45%19,450
2PGR1.13%17,873
3MCK1.03%3,975
4ACGL0.92%29,974
5CI0.88%10,067
6TRV0.79%7,629
7KR0.76%42,152
8CINF0.76%13,936
9HIG0.75%17,873
10TROW0.72%19,640
11CMCSA0.71%95,432
12SPG0.69%9,861
13MRSH0.68%12,081
14ADM0.63%24,662
15ELV0.60%5,250

2026-07-17

15 holdings · 12.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1ALL1.46%20,858
2PGR1.15%19,169
3MCK0.99%4,263
4CI0.94%10,803
5ACGL0.93%32,166
6TRV0.79%8,189
7HIG0.75%19,185
8CINF0.75%14,960
9KR0.75%45,208
10TROW0.73%21,064
11CMCSA0.70%102,392
12SPG0.69%10,581
13MRSH0.67%12,961
14ELV0.64%5,634
15ADM0.64%26,470

2026-07-16

15 holdings · 12.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1ALL1.52%20,946
2PGR1.26%19,250
3MCK1.00%4,281
4CI0.95%10,849
5ACGL0.95%32,303
6TRV0.80%8,224
7CINF0.78%15,024
8KR0.77%45,399
9HIG0.77%19,266
10TROW0.71%21,153
11ELV0.70%5,658
12CMCSA0.69%102,827
13SPG0.68%10,626
14MRSH0.67%13,016
15ADM0.63%26,583

2026-07-15

15 holdings · 13.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1ALL1.55%20,946
2PGR1.30%19,250
3MCK1.00%4,281
4ACGL0.96%32,303
5CI0.95%10,849
6TRV0.81%8,224
7CINF0.79%15,024
8HIG0.78%19,266
9KR0.77%45,399
10CMCSA0.71%102,827
11ELV0.69%5,658
12TROW0.69%21,153
13MRSH0.68%13,016
14SPG0.67%10,626
15ADM0.63%26,583

2026-07-14

15 holdings · 12.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1ALL1.52%20,946
2PGR1.29%19,250
3MCK1.00%4,281
4ACGL0.94%32,303
5CI0.92%10,849
6TRV0.81%8,224
7KR0.80%45,399
8CINF0.78%15,024
9HIG0.77%19,266
10TROW0.73%21,153
11CMCSA0.70%102,827
12ELV0.68%5,658
13SPG0.67%10,626
14MRSH0.67%13,016
15ADM0.62%26,583

2026-07-13

15 holdings · 12.8% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1ALL1.51%20,953
2PGR1.28%19,246
3MCK0.98%4,276
4ACGL0.96%32,440
5CI0.92%10,895
6TRV0.81%8,259
7KR0.79%45,291
8HIG0.78%19,347
9CINF0.77%15,088
10TROW0.72%21,090
11CMCSA0.70%103,262
12ELV0.69%5,637
13SPG0.67%10,590
14MRSH0.67%12,969
15ADM0.61%26,696

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

14.4%
Annual Volatility
0.87
Sharpe (1Y)
0.56
Sharpe (3Y)
-14.8%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-18.5%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove ONEV Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:-0.45%(2026-07-17)

Top Contributors

+0.073%
+0.048%
+0.022%

Top Detractors

-0.012%
-0.016%
-0.017%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.00%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How ONEV’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-07-1893 snapshots
Other28.4%
Financial Services11.4%
Industrials10.2%
Healthcare9.2%
Consumer Defensive7.8%
Consumer Cyclical7.7%
Utilities7.2%
Real Estate7.2%
Technology4.6%
Communication Services2.3%
Energy2.1%
Basic Materials2.1%
0.1%
Change since 2026-03-30
Financial Services
+4.2%
Real Estate
+3.4%
Industrials
-2.8%
Consumer Cyclical
-2.2%
Healthcare
-1.3%
Basic Materials
-1.3%
2026-03-302026-07-18

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

Comparing 2026-07-172026-07-181 buys, 50 sells

Positions Increased (1)

NEWLH
05K+5K
0.41%(+0.41)

Positions Decreased (50)

SELLCMCSA
102K95K-7K (-6.8%)
0.71%(+0.00)
SELLVICI
72K67K-5K (-6.8%)
0.56%(+0.01)
SELLGIS
53K49K-4K (-6.8%)
0.59%(+0.01)
SELLTSCO
52K49K-4K (-6.8%)
0.46%(+0.00)
EXITFFIV
3K0-3K (-100.0%)
0.00%(-0.40)
SELLCTSH
47K44K-3K (-6.8%)
0.60%(+0.01)
SELLKR
45K42K-3K (-6.8%)
0.76%(+0.01)
SELLACGL
32K30K-2K (-6.8%)
0.92%(-0.01)

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.