Consumer Cyclical

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF)

$4.0B
Market Cap
8.4
P/E Ratio
1.11
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 4.9 SafeBeneish M -2.31 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 8.4x earnings — a 76% discount to the sector average of 35.0x — ANF is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 4.9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. presents a distinct capital efficiency profile, generating returns on invested capital at 23.4%, which suggests strong operational leverage relative to the cost of equity. The DuPont decomposition reveals that this return is primarily fueled by exceptional gross margins of 61.5% rather than asset turnover or financial leverage, indicating a premium pricing strategy within the consumer cyclical sector. Credit risk metrics further support fundamental stability; an Altman Z-Score of 4.9 places the firm well above the distress threshold, while a Beneish M-Score of -2.31 signals low probability of earnings manipulation and high integrity in reported figures. However, operational momentum shows mixed signs: despite robust profitability, revenue growth remains modest at 6.4% year-over-year, and the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 indicates a neutral financial health trajectory without significant recent deterioration or improvement.

Valuation metrics highlight a substantial divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value models. Trading at an 8.4x P/E multiple, the stock is priced significantly below its sector average of 36.4x, suggesting the market assigns a deep discount to this consumer staple relative to peers. This compression aligns with a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis that implies a fair value of $102 per share, indicating that current prices may undervalue future cash flow potential if growth assumptions hold. The disparity between the low multiple and high ROIC suggests the market is pricing in persistent execution risks or macro headwinds rather than reflecting the underlying capital efficiency demonstrated by the 23.4% return on invested capital.

The risk-reward landscape appears bifurcated, with strong balance sheet fundamentals contrasting against muted top-line expansion. While the low P/E and favorable DCF gap offer a margin of safety relative to sector norms, the modest revenue growth rate limits the upside catalyst typically required for multiple re-rating in consumer discretionary names. Investors must weigh whether the current discount reflects temporary cyclical weakness or structural challenges that could prevent realization of the $102 fair value target amidst continued competitive pressures in apparel retailing.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$119$94$79
3%$135$102$84
4%$158$112$90

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $102 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

8.4x
ANF P/E
35.0x
Sector Avg
-76%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
4.9
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.31
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

61.5%
Gross Margin
9.6%
Net Margin
23.4%
ROIC
+6.4%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-10.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
378.4M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

1.49x
Debt / Equity
1.49x
Current Ratio
304.5x
Interest Coverage
11.63%
FCF Yield
878.2M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.33
Act: $1.59
+19.7%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $2.30
Act: $2.91
+26.6%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $2.16
Act: $2.36
+9.4%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $3.57
Act: $3.68
+3.1%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

7.4
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
2.80
Price/Book
2M
Avg Volume
$133.11
52W High
$65.40
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$132M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding ANF
0.09%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$141B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XRT or VFQY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ANF shares regardless of Abercrombie & Fitch Co.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $132M of passive capital is structurally linked to ANF through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ANF's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Abercrombie & Fitch Co. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

ANF Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
ANFEpicenterVBRETFMDYETFSPMDETFMUSALow RiskADBELow RiskBJLow RiskDKSMed RiskMMed Risk
ANF Price Drop (%)0

If Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies MURPHY USA INC (MUSA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with ANF. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 11 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

ANF Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
ANF

Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

ANF Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Abercrombie & Fitch Co. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$378M
EBITDA
$878M
FCF Conversion
43%
Reinvestment Rate
57%
43% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. converts 43% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 57% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1312,269$73.06$896,373.14
2026-05-07289$79.40$22,946.6
2026-05-06100$78.51$7,851
2026-05-04177$84.54$14,963.58
2026-04-08549$97.96$53,780.04
2026-04-06814$92.25$75,091.5
2026-03-319$87.19$784.71
2026-03-2540$88.84$3,553.6
2026-03-236$87.98$527.88
2026-03-02277$97.80$27,090.6
2026-02-27489$98.99$48,406.11
2026-02-021,300$97.63$126,919
2026-01-3041$93.88$3,849.08
2026-01-2156,308$100.69$5.7M
2026-01-2031$104.13$3,228.03
2025-12-29721$126.84$91,451.64
2025-12-262,751$126.74$348,661.74
2025-12-221,042$121.06$126,144.52
2025-12-172,906$116.35$338,113.1
2025-12-151,160$112.09$130,024.4
2025-12-11100$107.06$10,706
2025-12-0910$95.99$959.9
2025-12-0151,965$97.87$5.1M
2025-11-101,637$71.57$117,160.09
2025-11-04161$70.15$11,294.15

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare ANF to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.