Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 8.4x earnings — a 76% discount to the sector average of 35.0x — ANF is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 4.9.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedAbercrombie & Fitch Co. presents a distinct capital efficiency profile, generating returns on invested capital at 23.4%, which suggests strong operational leverage relative to the cost of equity. The DuPont decomposition reveals that this return is primarily fueled by exceptional gross margins of 61.5% rather than asset turnover or financial leverage, indicating a premium pricing strategy within the consumer cyclical sector. Credit risk metrics further support fundamental stability; an Altman Z-Score of 4.9 places the firm well above the distress threshold, while a Beneish M-Score of -2.31 signals low probability of earnings manipulation and high integrity in reported figures. However, operational momentum shows mixed signs: despite robust profitability, revenue growth remains modest at 6.4% year-over-year, and the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 indicates a neutral financial health trajectory without significant recent deterioration or improvement.
Valuation metrics highlight a substantial divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value models. Trading at an 8.4x P/E multiple, the stock is priced significantly below its sector average of 36.4x, suggesting the market assigns a deep discount to this consumer staple relative to peers. This compression aligns with a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis that implies a fair value of $102 per share, indicating that current prices may undervalue future cash flow potential if growth assumptions hold. The disparity between the low multiple and high ROIC suggests the market is pricing in persistent execution risks or macro headwinds rather than reflecting the underlying capital efficiency demonstrated by the 23.4% return on invested capital.
The risk-reward landscape appears bifurcated, with strong balance sheet fundamentals contrasting against muted top-line expansion. While the low P/E and favorable DCF gap offer a margin of safety relative to sector norms, the modest revenue growth rate limits the upside catalyst typically required for multiple re-rating in consumer discretionary names. Investors must weigh whether the current discount reflects temporary cyclical weakness or structural challenges that could prevent realization of the $102 fair value target amidst continued competitive pressures in apparel retailing.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $119 | $94 | $79 |
| 3% | $135 | $102 | $84 |
| 4% | $158 | $112 | $90 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $102 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XRT or VFQY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ANF shares regardless of Abercrombie & Fitch Co.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $132M of passive capital is structurally linked to ANF through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ANF's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Abercrombie & Fitch Co. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies MURPHY USA INC (MUSA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with ANF. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 11 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ANF Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ANF Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ANF Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Abercrombie & Fitch Co. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. converts 43% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 57% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 12,269 | $73.06 | $896,373.14 |
| 2026-05-07 | 289 | $79.40 | $22,946.6 |
| 2026-05-06 | 100 | $78.51 | $7,851 |
| 2026-05-04 | 177 | $84.54 | $14,963.58 |
| 2026-04-08 | 549 | $97.96 | $53,780.04 |
| 2026-04-06 | 814 | $92.25 | $75,091.5 |
| 2026-03-31 | 9 | $87.19 | $784.71 |
| 2026-03-25 | 40 | $88.84 | $3,553.6 |
| 2026-03-23 | 6 | $87.98 | $527.88 |
| 2026-03-02 | 277 | $97.80 | $27,090.6 |
| 2026-02-27 | 489 | $98.99 | $48,406.11 |
| 2026-02-02 | 1,300 | $97.63 | $126,919 |
| 2026-01-30 | 41 | $93.88 | $3,849.08 |
| 2026-01-21 | 56,308 | $100.69 | $5.7M |
| 2026-01-20 | 31 | $104.13 | $3,228.03 |
| 2025-12-29 | 721 | $126.84 | $91,451.64 |
| 2025-12-26 | 2,751 | $126.74 | $348,661.74 |
| 2025-12-22 | 1,042 | $121.06 | $126,144.52 |
| 2025-12-17 | 2,906 | $116.35 | $338,113.1 |
| 2025-12-15 | 1,160 | $112.09 | $130,024.4 |
| 2025-12-11 | 100 | $107.06 | $10,706 |
| 2025-12-09 | 10 | $95.99 | $959.9 |
| 2025-12-01 | 51,965 | $97.87 | $5.1M |
| 2025-11-10 | 1,637 | $71.57 | $117,160.09 |
| 2025-11-04 | 161 | $70.15 | $11,294.15 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ANF to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.