Energy

Antero Resources Corporation (AR)

$13.8B
Market Cap
22.1
P/E Ratio
0.50
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 9/9Altman Z 2.2 Gray ZoneBeneish M -1.85 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC -1.1%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 22.1x earnings — a 37% discount to the sector average of 34.8x — AR is in the lower valuation range. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 9/9) with Altman Z of 2.2. Beneish M-Score of -1.85 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

Antero Resources Corporation presents a distinct dichotomy between operational resilience and capital efficiency. While the Piotroski F-Score of 9/9 signals exceptional financial strength and the Beneish M-Score of -1.85 suggests low earnings manipulation risk, the ROIC-WACC spread of -1.1% indicates that current returns on invested capital fall short of the cost of equity. This negative spread is a critical constraint despite robust leverage in the DuPont decomposition; specifically, the high Net Margin of 12.7% and Gross Margin of 22.1% combined with accelerating Revenue Growth YoY of 21.7% drive profitability, yet these factors have not translated into value creation above the hurdle rate implied by a WACC of 7.6%.

Valuation metrics reflect this tension between growth momentum and capital allocation efficiency. The stock trades at a Current P/E of 22.1x, which is significantly discounted relative to the Sector Avg P/E of 31.0x, suggesting the market may be pricing in concerns regarding future cash flow sustainability despite strong top-line expansion. A DCF analysis anchors fair value at $58, implying that current investor expectations for implied growth are conservative or that the model assumes a reversion to a lower multiple regime consistent with the negative ROIC-WACC spread rather than sustained premium valuation multiples seen across the broader energy sector.

The Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places the company in the "gray zone" regarding bankruptcy risk, hovering below the traditional safety threshold but mitigated by the flawless Piotroski score and substantial revenue growth. While the fundamental economics show a capable operator generating high margins, the negative spread between return on capital and the cost of capital creates an overhang that limits upside potential until operational leverage improves or asset base efficiency increases to restore positive value creation.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%7.6%9.6%
2%$70$49$35
3%$91$58$40
4%$132$72$45

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.6%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $58 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

22.1x
AR P/E
34.8x
Sector Avg
-37%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

9/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
2.2
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-1.85
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

22.1%
Gross Margin
12.7%
Net Margin
6.6%
ROIC
7.6%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -1.1%— Negative spread.
+21.7%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+1008.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.2B
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.72x
Debt / Equity
0.55x
Current Ratio
11.6x
Interest Coverage
0.8x
Net Debt / EBITDA
8.17%
FCF Yield
1.7B
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.88
Act: $0.78
-11.0%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.42
Act: $0.35
-16.4%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.25
Act: $0.16
-37.3%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.52
Act: $0.43
-17.9%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

10.2
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.83
Price/Book
6M
Avg Volume
$45.75
52W High
$29.10
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$819M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding AR
0.18%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$446B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XOP or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell AR shares regardless of Antero Resources Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $819M of passive capital is structurally linked to AR through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on AR's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Antero Resources Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

AR Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
AREpicenterVBETFVXFETFVBRETFXOMLow RiskCVXLow RiskCOPLow RiskOVVMed RiskDINOLow Risk
AR Price Drop (%)0

If Antero Resources Corporation (AR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with AR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 13 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

AR Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
AR

Float lock-up computed from 13 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

AR Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Antero Resources Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$1.2B
EBITDA
$1.7B
FCF Conversion
72%
Reinvestment Rate
28%
72% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
6.6%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-1.1%

Antero Resources Corporation converts 72% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-1.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-0833,048$36.37$1.2M
2026-04-1719,003$37.49$712,422.47
2026-04-144,318$37.21$160,672.78
2026-04-1339,405$37.89$1.5M
2026-04-0626,702$40.45$1.1M
2026-03-2556,652$43.37$2.5M
2026-03-24200$42.56$8,512
2026-03-237,748$43.09$333,861.32
2026-03-18155$41.13$6,375.15
2026-03-162,100$40.99$86,079
2026-03-13473$40.35$19,085.55
2026-03-11439$37.47$16,449.33
2026-03-1060,000$39.09$2.3M
2026-03-091,400$38.83$54,362
2026-03-041,206$37.59$45,333.54
2026-02-233,878$35.54$137,824.12
2026-02-171,500$34.76$52,140
2026-02-121,400$35.11$49,154
2026-02-095$34.37$171.85
2026-02-029,717$36.37$353,407.29
2026-01-261,000$34.29$34,290
2026-01-231,760$34.38$60,508.8
2026-01-1522,649$31.94$723,409.06
2026-01-05573$34.21$19,602.33
2025-12-263$34.19$102.57
2025-12-15200$35.19$7,038
2025-12-0850,198$36.75$1.8M
2025-11-201,071$35.08$37,570.68

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare AR to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.