AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 8.1x earnings — a 58% discount to the sector average of 19.2x — AXS is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 0.8.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of AXIS Capital Holdings Limited reveal a distinct divergence between return on invested capital and shareholder returns, driven primarily by significant financial leverage rather than operational efficiency. While the DuPont decomposition indicates that equity multipliers account for 5.42x in the reported 15.9% ROE, the underlying ROIC stands at only 2.9%, suggesting the spread over the cost of capital is minimal or potentially negative depending on the specific WACC assumption. This leverage-heavy structure contrasts sharply with a modest asset turnover rate of 0.19x and a robust net margin of 15.7%. Quality metrics further temper the equity return narrative; a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals average financial health without clear signs of strong momentum or improving fundamentals, while revenue growth remains subdued at 6.8% year-over-year.
Valuation metrics present AXIS as materially discounted relative to its peer group and historical norms, with the current P/E ratio of 8.1x trading substantially below the sector average of 18.3x. This compression implies that the market is pricing in limited future growth potential or assigning a higher risk premium due to the low ROIC profile and moderate Piotroski score. Although the exact DCF fair value cannot be calculated without an explicit WACC and terminal growth rate, the wide valuation gap suggests the stock may offer margin of safety if earnings persist at current levels, yet it also reflects skepticism regarding the sustainability of returns given the inefficient capital deployment indicated by the low ROIC. Insider activity over the past 90 days remains neutral with zero net flow, offering no clear directional signal from management or major shareholders to counterbalance these valuation concerns.
The risk-reward profile is characterized by a tension between attractive entry valuations and structural inefficiencies in capital generation. The combination of an ROIC below typical cost-of-capital thresholds and a mediocre Piotroski score introduces execution risks that are not fully mitigated by the current discount. Investors must weigh whether the 8.1x P/E adequately compensates for the lack of organic growth acceleration and the reliance on leverage to drive equity returns, rather than operating margin expansion or asset efficiency improvements.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like KIE or ONEV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell AXS shares regardless of AXIS Capital Holdings Limited's individual fundamentals. We estimate $394M of passive capital is structurally linked to AXS through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on AXS's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in AXIS Capital Holdings Limited to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORP (CINF) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with AXS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 11 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
AXS Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest AXS Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 226 | $98.51 | $22,263.26 |
| 2026-04-29 | 7 | $100.35 | $702.45 |
| 2026-04-28 | 10 | $99.51 | $995.1 |
| 2026-04-10 | 3,671 | $102.43 | $376,020.53 |
| 2026-03-23 | 1 | $99.57 | $99.57 |
| 2026-03-03 | 1,924 | $106.91 | $205,694.84 |
| 2026-02-20 | 2 | $102.59 | $205.18 |
| 2026-02-09 | 5 | $106.53 | $532.65 |
| 2025-12-18 | 156 | $107.06 | $16,701.36 |
| 2025-11-26 | 80 | $100.16 | $8,012.8 |
| 2025-11-25 | 388 | $99.57 | $38,633.16 |
| 2025-10-15 | 70 | $98.88 | $6,921.6 |
| 2025-10-14 | 12 | $97.34 | $1,168.08 |
| 2025-10-06 | 12,217 | $94.52 | $1.2M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare AXS to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.