Technology

Bullish (BLSH)

Market Cap
P/E Ratio
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Beneish M -2.47 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of Bullish (BLSH) present a stark divergence from typical technology sector characteristics, characterized by negative capital efficiency and margin compression. An ROIC of -15.2% indicates that the company is currently destroying value relative to its cost of equity, while the DuPont decomposition reveals no positive drivers; both net and gross margins are effectively zero or negative, signaling an inability to generate operating profitability from revenue. This operational weakness is corroborated by a declining top line with -2.1% year-over-year growth and a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, which suggests moderate financial health but lacks the momentum required for high-quality compounders. Although the Beneish M-Score of -2.47 points to low earnings manipulation risk, the core business metrics reflect significant operational distress rather than accounting fraud.

Valuation multiples further highlight a disconnect between current performance and market pricing standards within the technology sector. Trading at a P/E multiple against a historical backdrop and a peer average of 61.0x creates an ambiguous valuation scenario where traditional earnings-based models fail due to negative or negligible net income. The absence of positive earnings growth implies that any DCF fair value calculation would rely entirely on implied future turnaround assumptions rather than current cash flow generation, making the stock's price sensitive to speculative narratives about potential margin expansion rather than proven execution.

The risk-reward profile is heavily skewed by these fundamental deltas; while the low Beneish score mitigates concerns regarding earnings quality manipulation, the negative ROIC and shrinking revenues suggest a high probability of continued value erosion absent a strategic pivot. Investors must weigh whether the current valuation adequately compensates for the capital destruction observed in the balance sheet or if the market is pricing in an unproven recovery that historical metrics do not currently support.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
-2.47
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

0.0%
Gross Margin
-0.3%
Net Margin
-15.2%
ROIC
-2.1%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-1073.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-23.2M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.20x
Debt / Equity
29.28x
Current Ratio
-14.0x
Interest Coverage
-727.0M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.05
Act: $-0.05
-3.4%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.10
Act: $0.10
-4.7%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.16
Act: $0.19
+23.3%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
Price/Book
Avg Volume
52W High
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$198M
Tracked Passive Exposure
5
ETFs Holding BLSH
0.36%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$55B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like ARKK or ARKW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell BLSH shares regardless of Bullish's individual fundamentals. We estimate $198M of passive capital is structurally linked to BLSH through 5 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on BLSH's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 5 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Bullish to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

BLSH Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
BLSHEpicenterVONGETFARKKETFARKWETFTSLALow RiskSHOPLow RiskAMDLow RiskHOODHigh RiskCOINLow Risk
BLSH Price Drop (%)0

If Bullish (BLSH) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TESLA INC (TSLA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with BLSH. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 5 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

BLSH Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
BLSH

Float lock-up computed from 5 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-147,586$41.81$317,170.66
2026-05-13385$42.80$16,478
2026-05-1289,391$44.03$3.9M
2026-05-111,451$43.66$63,350.66
2026-05-081,830$41.20$75,396
2026-05-0631,234$45.34$1.4M
2026-05-0120$37.73$754.6
2026-04-302,118$36.51$77,328.18
2026-04-293$39.82$119.46
2026-04-2438,099$42.33$1.6M
2026-04-2341$43.31$1,775.71
2026-04-22173,410$41.93$7.3M
2026-04-2134,696$43.10$1.5M
2026-04-20248$43.51$10,790.48
2026-04-171,029$41.42$42,621.18
2026-04-16525$41.67$21,876.75
2026-04-10119,012$36.12$4.3M
2026-04-067,616$36.37$276,993.92
2026-04-015,071$35.73$181,186.83
2026-03-30105$34.43$3,615.15
2026-03-2725,116$36.44$915,227.04
2026-03-2625,169$37.43$942,075.67
2026-03-2528,661$37.37$1.1M
2026-03-24954$39.55$37,730.7
2026-03-2386,370$37.97$3.3M
2026-03-201,714$39.60$67,874.4
2026-03-1831,969$39.94$1.3M
2026-03-171,928$39.62$76,387.36
2026-03-16100$36.62$3,662
2026-03-1154$36.73$1,983.42

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare BLSH to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.