BRPETRACNOR9 (BRPETRACNOR9)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 3.6 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation profile exhibits a compelling spread between the 13.1% return on invested capital and the 7.9% weighted average cost of capital, generating a +5.2% excess return that suggests efficient deployment of equity without relying on excessive leverage or margin expansion to drive returns. Financial integrity appears robust, evidenced by a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicating strong balance sheet health and earnings quality, while the Beneish M-Score of -2.59 further signals low probability of financial manipulation. However, this operational strength contrasts sharply with top-line dynamics; despite net margins holding at an impressive 22% supported by a 47.6% gross margin, revenue contracted 2.4% year-over-year, implying that the DuPont decomposition of ROE is likely being sustained primarily through high profitability rather than volume growth or asset turnover acceleration.
Valuation metrics present a significant divergence between current pricing and intrinsic value models. The stock trades at a compressed multiple of 6.6x earnings, which sits well below historical norms for firms with such expansive margins, suggesting the market has priced in substantial downside risk regarding future revenue trajectories. A discounted cash flow analysis anchors fair value at $17, implying that if current profitability persists and growth constraints are temporary, the present price offers a margin of safety relative to modeled intrinsic worth. This discrepancy indicates the market is currently discounting the high-quality fundamentals heavily, potentially anticipating further contraction or capital inefficiency despite the positive ROIC-WACC spread.
The risk-reward profile hinges on whether the revenue decline represents a cyclical trough or a structural shift in demand. While the Altman Z-Score of 3.6 confirms a safe distance from bankruptcy territory and the high F-Score supports earnings credibility, the negative growth trajectory introduces volatility that may prevent multiple expansion even if margins remain stable. Investors must weigh the attractive entry valuation against the uncertainty surrounding top-line recovery; the data suggests a deep value opportunity contingent on the assumption that the 22% net margin can be maintained as volumes normalize, creating an asymmetric setup where downside is capped by current low multiples while upside depends entirely on growth re-acceleration.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.9% | 9.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $22 | $15 | $11 |
| 3% | $29 | $17 | $12 |
| 4% | $42 | $21 | $14 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $17 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like EMXC or SCHE, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell BRPETRACNOR9 shares regardless of BRPETRACNOR9's individual fundamentals. We estimate $206M of passive capital is structurally linked to BRPETRACNOR9 through 5 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on BRPETRACNOR9's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 5 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in BRPETRACNOR9 to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If BRPETRACNOR9 (BRPETRACNOR9) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TW0002330008) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with BRPETRACNOR9. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 5 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
BRPETRACNOR9 Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest BRPETRACNOR9 Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 5 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
BRPETRACNOR9 Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does BRPETRACNOR9 convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
BRPETRACNOR9 converts 36% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 64% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 5.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Compare BRPETRACNOR9 to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.