BRPETRACNOR9 (BRPETRACNOR9)

$693.4B
Market Cap
6.6
P/E Ratio
0.16
Beta
7.48%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 3.6 SafeBeneish M -2.59 CleanROIC−WACC +5.2%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 3.6 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation profile exhibits a compelling spread between the 13.1% return on invested capital and the 7.9% weighted average cost of capital, generating a +5.2% excess return that suggests efficient deployment of equity without relying on excessive leverage or margin expansion to drive returns. Financial integrity appears robust, evidenced by a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicating strong balance sheet health and earnings quality, while the Beneish M-Score of -2.59 further signals low probability of financial manipulation. However, this operational strength contrasts sharply with top-line dynamics; despite net margins holding at an impressive 22% supported by a 47.6% gross margin, revenue contracted 2.4% year-over-year, implying that the DuPont decomposition of ROE is likely being sustained primarily through high profitability rather than volume growth or asset turnover acceleration.

Valuation metrics present a significant divergence between current pricing and intrinsic value models. The stock trades at a compressed multiple of 6.6x earnings, which sits well below historical norms for firms with such expansive margins, suggesting the market has priced in substantial downside risk regarding future revenue trajectories. A discounted cash flow analysis anchors fair value at $17, implying that if current profitability persists and growth constraints are temporary, the present price offers a margin of safety relative to modeled intrinsic worth. This discrepancy indicates the market is currently discounting the high-quality fundamentals heavily, potentially anticipating further contraction or capital inefficiency despite the positive ROIC-WACC spread.

The risk-reward profile hinges on whether the revenue decline represents a cyclical trough or a structural shift in demand. While the Altman Z-Score of 3.6 confirms a safe distance from bankruptcy territory and the high F-Score supports earnings credibility, the negative growth trajectory introduces volatility that may prevent multiple expansion even if margins remain stable. Investors must weigh the attractive entry valuation against the uncertainty surrounding top-line recovery; the data suggests a deep value opportunity contingent on the assumption that the 22% net margin can be maintained as volumes normalize, creating an asymmetric setup where downside is capped by current low multiples while upside depends entirely on growth re-acceleration.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%7.9%9.9%
2%$22$15$11
3%$29$17$12
4%$42$21$14

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $17 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
3.6
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.59
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

47.6%
Gross Margin
22.0%
Net Margin
13.1%
ROIC
7.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +5.2%— Positive value creation spread.
-2.4%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+160.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
16.5B
Free Cash Flow
49%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

1.93x
Debt / Equity
0.71x
Current Ratio
7.5x
Interest Coverage
0.4x
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.32%
FCF Yield
46.0B
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $2.64
Act: $2.73
+3.6%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.72
Act: $2.02
+17.8%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $1.82
Act: $2.52
+38.6%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $1.57
Act: $1.16
-26.1%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

6.3
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.67
Price/Book
14M
Avg Volume
$53.96
52W High
$30.84
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$206M
Tracked Passive Exposure
5
ETFs Holding BRPETRACNOR9
0.15%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$134B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like EMXC or SCHE, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell BRPETRACNOR9 shares regardless of BRPETRACNOR9's individual fundamentals. We estimate $206M of passive capital is structurally linked to BRPETRACNOR9 through 5 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on BRPETRACNOR9's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 5 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in BRPETRACNOR9 to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

BRPETRACNOR9 Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
BRPETRACNOR9EpicenterIXUSETFACWIETFEEMETFTW0002330008Low RiskTW0002330008Low RiskKR7005930003Low RiskKR7000660001Low RiskNVDALow Risk
BRPETRACNOR9 Price Drop (%)0

If BRPETRACNOR9 (BRPETRACNOR9) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TW0002330008) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with BRPETRACNOR9. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 5 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

BRPETRACNOR9 Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
BRPETRACNOR9

Float lock-up computed from 5 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

BRPETRACNOR9 Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does BRPETRACNOR9 convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$16.5B
EBITDA
$46.0B
FCF Conversion
36%
Reinvestment Rate
64%
36% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
13.1%
ROIC − WACC Spread
5.2%

BRPETRACNOR9 converts 36% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 64% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 5.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare BRPETRACNOR9 to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.