Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 15.4x earnings — a 56% discount to the sector average of 35.0x — CCK is in the lower valuation range. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9) with Altman Z of 2.2.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedCrown Holdings demonstrates robust fundamental quality, evidenced by a positive ROIC-WACC spread of 4.8%, indicating the firm generates returns exceeding its cost of capital. This efficiency is underpinned by strong profitability metrics and financial stability; a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 signals high-quality earnings with improving fundamentals, while a Beneish M-Score of -2.70 effectively rules out manipulation risks. The DuPont decomposition reveals that the company's ROE is primarily driven by operational leverage rather than excessive debt or margin compression, supported by healthy gross margins at 22% and net margins holding steady at 6%. Furthermore, an Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places the firm in a safe zone regarding bankruptcy risk, suggesting a resilient balance sheet capable of sustaining operations through cyclical downturns typical for consumer discretionary sectors.
Valuation analysis highlights a significant discount relative to both historical norms and peer comparisons, with the current P/E ratio at 15.4x compared to a sector average of 34.6x. This compression suggests the market is pricing in lower growth expectations or assigning a risk premium specific to the packaging sub-sector, despite the company's solid operational metrics. When contrasted against a DCF-derived fair value of $517, the current trading multiple implies that the stock may be undervalued relative to its intrinsic worth, assuming the underlying cash flow projections and implied growth rates hold true. The disparity between the low valuation multiple and the strong fundamental score creates a scenario where price could converge with value if market sentiment aligns with the company's operational reality.
Risk assessment indicates a favorable risk-reward profile given the high integrity scores and moderate leverage, though investors must weigh these strengths against sector-specific cyclicality inherent to consumer packaging demand. The combination of a low valuation multiple and high fundamental quality suggests limited downside protection is priced in relative to peers, yet the market's skepticism may offer an entry point for those comfortable with cyclical volatility. Ultimately, the data presents a case where intrinsic value appears detached from current pricing, pending confirmation that future revenue growth can sustain the margin profile required to justify the DCF fair value target.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.5% | 9.5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $615 | $426 | $293 |
| 3% | $813 | $517 | $336 |
| 4% | $1210 | $659 | $394 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $517 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VAW or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell CCK shares regardless of Crown Holdings, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $696M of passive capital is structurally linked to CCK through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on CCK's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Crown Holdings, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Linde plc (LIN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with CCK. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 12 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
CCK Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest CCK Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 12 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
CCK Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Crown Holdings, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Crown Holdings, Inc. converts 55% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 4.8% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | 737 | $101.09 | $74,503.33 |
| 2026-04-20 | 269 | $107.15 | $28,823.35 |
| 2026-03-31 | 3 | $98.22 | $294.66 |
| 2026-03-23 | 3 | $98.44 | $295.32 |
| 2026-03-18 | 1,855 | $105.29 | $195,312.95 |
| 2026-03-10 | 1,421 | $105.12 | $149,375.52 |
| 2026-03-05 | 18 | $111.30 | $2,003.4 |
| 2026-02-23 | 300 | $114.80 | $34,440 |
| 2026-02-19 | 1,008 | $114.08 | $114,992.64 |
| 2026-02-17 | 1,659 | $110.79 | $183,800.61 |
| 2026-02-09 | 1 | $112.88 | $112.88 |
| 2026-02-06 | 7,376 | $114.20 | $842,339.2 |
| 2026-01-27 | 50,685 | $104.38 | $5.3M |
| 2026-01-26 | 1,491 | $103.92 | $154,944.72 |
| 2026-01-23 | 2,038 | $102.31 | $208,507.78 |
| 2026-01-21 | 60,821 | $101.57 | $6.2M |
| 2025-12-22 | 1,558 | $101.99 | $158,900.42 |
| 2025-12-19 | 49,091 | $102.56 | $5.0M |
| 2025-12-17 | 4,311 | $101.53 | $437,695.83 |
| 2025-12-16 | 100 | $101.25 | $10,125 |
| 2025-12-12 | 396 | $95.95 | $37,996.2 |
| 2025-11-14 | 965 | $100.97 | $97,436.05 |
| 2025-11-10 | 82,341 | $97.82 | $8.1M |
| 2025-11-06 | 8 | $98.62 | $788.96 |
| 2025-11-05 | 20 | $97.28 | $1,945.6 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare CCK to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.