Real Estate

Century Communities, Inc. (CCS)

$1.6B
Market Cap
11.5
P/E Ratio
1.53
Beta
2.15%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 3.3 SafeBeneish M -2.68 CleanROIC−WACC -5.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 11.5x earnings — a 76% discount to the sector average of 47.4x — CCS is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 3.3.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of Century Communities reveal a significant capital efficiency gap, where the return on invested capital stands at 4.0%, substantially below the 9.5% weighted average cost of capital, resulting in a negative spread that erodes intrinsic value creation. This underperformance is compounded by declining revenue growth of -6.4% and thin net margins of 3.6%, despite gross margins holding steady at 17.4%. While the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 suggests moderate financial strength, it falls short of robust quality indicators; conversely, an Altman Z-Score of 3.3 places the company in a gray zone regarding bankruptcy risk, and a Beneish M-Score of -2.68 indicates low probability of earnings manipulation, though this does not offset the structural capital drag.

Valuation metrics present a stark divergence between market pricing and model-implied worth. The current P/E ratio of 11.5x trades at a steep discount to the sector average of 89.5x, suggesting the market is heavily penalizing recent performance trends rather than reflecting standard real estate multiples. However, this apparent bargain must be contextualized against a DCF fair value estimate of $4 per share; without knowing the current trading price relative to this anchor, it remains unclear whether the low multiple reflects a temporary dislocation or a permanent impairment in growth expectations that the model has already priced in.

The risk profile is further nuanced by the Altman Z-Score hovering near distress territory and negative capital returns, which contrasts with the relatively clean Beneish M-Score. These factors suggest that while earnings integrity appears intact, the underlying business faces headwinds that have compressed valuation multiples well below historical norms and peer benchmarks. Investors must weigh whether the depressed multiple offers adequate compensation for the persistent ROIC-WACC spread and revenue contraction inherent in this specific real estate exposure.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →7.5%9.5%11.5%
2%$14$0$0
3%$24$4$0
4%$40$10$0

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $4 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

11.5x
CCS P/E
47.4x
Sector Avg
-76%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
3.3
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.68
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

17.4%
Gross Margin
3.6%
Net Margin
4.0%
ROIC
9.5%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -5.4%— Negative spread.
-6.4%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-55.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
124.3M
Free Cash Flow
28%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

0.72x
Debt / Equity
11.54x
Current Ratio
5.4x
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.27%
FCF Yield
235.6M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $1.65
Act: $1.36
-17.6%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.08
Act: $1.37
+26.9%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.86
Act: $1.52
+76.7%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.39
Act: $1.59
+14.8%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

7.4
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
0.63
Price/Book
282001
Avg Volume
$76.00
52W High
$50.42
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$40M
Tracked Passive Exposure
6
ETFs Holding CCS
0.10%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$38B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XHB or VFVA, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell CCS shares regardless of Century Communities, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $40M of passive capital is structurally linked to CCS through 6 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on CCS's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Century Communities, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

CCS Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
CCSEpicenterSPSMETFSPTMETFVCRETFAMZNLow RiskTSLALow RiskHDLow RiskMODLow RiskMTHLow Risk
CCS Price Drop (%)0

If Century Communities, Inc. (CCS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with CCS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

CCS Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
CCS

Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

CCS Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Century Communities, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$124M
EBITDA
$236M
FCF Conversion
53%
Reinvestment Rate
47%
53% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
4.0%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-5.4%

Century Communities, Inc. converts 53% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-5.4%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-04-27182$59.81$10,885.42
2026-04-02187$57.41$10,735.67
2026-04-01558$57.38$32,018.04
2026-03-0919$61.41$1,166.79
2026-03-0522$64.83$1,426.26
2026-02-19701$73.23$51,334.23
2026-02-175,454$74.84$408,177.36
2026-01-1568$68.61$4,665.48
2025-12-301$59.67$59.67
2025-12-2311$58.82$647.02
2025-12-1250$63.33$3,166.5
2025-12-1055$60.48$3,326.4
2025-11-2641$64.14$2,629.74
2025-11-05290$59.63$17,292.7

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare CCS to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.