Consumer Cyclical

Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH)

$1.3B
Market Cap
6.5
P/E Ratio
1.88
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 2/9Altman Z 2.5 Gray ZoneBeneish M -1.91 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC -2.7%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 6.5x earnings — a 82% discount to the sector average of 35.0x — DFH is in the lower valuation range. Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 2/9. Beneish M-Score of -1.91 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of Dream Finders Homes, Inc. reveal a company currently generating value below its cost of capital, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -2.7%. This negative spread suggests that the firm is destroying shareholder wealth in absolute terms rather than creating it. A DuPont-style analysis highlights this inefficiency: while net margins sit at 5.0% and gross margins at 17.5%, these profitability metrics are being eroded by declining revenue growth of -2.9%. The capital structure appears fragile, with an Altman Z-Score of 2.5 hovering near the distress threshold, whereas the Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 indicates severe deterioration in financial health across multiple dimensions such as operating profitability and leverage ratios.

Valuation metrics present a stark divergence between market pricing and historical norms within the consumer cyclical sector. The stock trades at a current P/E ratio of 6.5x, which is significantly compressed relative to the sector average of 36.4x. This deep discount implies that the market has priced in substantial downside risk rather than anticipating robust future growth; indeed, any reasonable DCF model utilizing these inputs would likely yield a fair value far below current levels given the negative spread and shrinking top line. The low multiple does not necessarily reflect undervaluation but rather a consensus expectation of continued operational contraction and potential balance sheet stress.

Risk indicators further complicate the investment thesis, with a Beneish M-Score of -1.91 suggesting that earnings quality is unlikely to be manipulated downward, yet this credibility comes at the cost of deteriorating fundamentals. The combination of negative capital returns, declining revenue, and a precarious Z-score creates a high-risk profile where traditional growth drivers are absent. Investors must weigh whether the extreme valuation compression offers sufficient margin of safety against the probability of further fundamental degradation or if the market is correctly anticipating a prolonged period of value destruction before any potential turnaround occurs.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

6.5x
DFH P/E
35.0x
Sector Avg
-82%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

2/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics
2.5
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-1.91
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

17.5%
Gross Margin
5.0%
Net Margin
9.7%
ROIC
12.4%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -2.7%— Negative spread.
-2.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-35.2%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-126.4M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

1.32x
Debt / Equity
1.67x
Current Ratio
1.2x
Net Debt / EBITDA
-7.72%
FCF Yield
298.7M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.63
Act: $0.54
-14.4%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.61
Act: $0.56
-8.4%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.50
Act: $0.47
-5.8%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.64
Act: $0.58
-9.4%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

7.0
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
0.89
Price/Book
554308
Avg Volume
$31.50
52W High
$13.39
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$16M
Tracked Passive Exposure
5
ETFs Holding DFH
0.04%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$37B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XHB or SLYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell DFH shares regardless of Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $16M of passive capital is structurally linked to DFH through 5 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on DFH's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 5 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Dream Finders Homes, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

DFH Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
DFHEpicenterSPSMETFSPTMETFVCRETFAMZNLow RiskTSLALow RiskNVDALow RiskAAPLLow RiskHDLow Risk
DFH Price Drop (%)0

If Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with DFH. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 5 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

DFH Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
DFH

Float lock-up computed from 5 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

DFH Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Dream Finders Homes, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$-126,366,000
EBITDA
$299M
FCF Conversion
-42%
Reinvestment Rate
142%
-42% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
9.7%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-2.7%

Dream Finders Homes, Inc. converts -42% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 142% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.7%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-141,353$13.43$18,170.79
2026-05-13197,796$13.02$2.6M
2026-05-0512,278$14.04$172,383.12
2026-04-301,661$14.15$23,503.15
2026-04-29254$14.78$3,754.12
2026-04-204,761$14.82$70,558.02
2026-04-179$13.58$122.22
2026-04-08290$13.42$3,891.8
2026-04-06675$14.07$9,497.25
2026-03-27783$14.21$11,126.43
2026-03-2581,460$14.08$1.1M
2026-03-2314,716$13.82$203,375.12
2026-03-2022,307$14.10$314,528.7
2026-03-171,291$15.77$20,359.07
2026-03-161,460$15.47$22,586.2
2026-03-11176,486$15.80$2.8M
2026-03-101,074$15.71$16,872.54
2026-03-051,754$17.57$30,817.78
2026-03-041,382$17.55$24,254.1
2026-03-0311,627$17.71$205,914.17
2026-02-261,690$18.44$31,163.6
2026-02-2518,724$19.20$359,500.8
2026-02-2451,089$20.03$1.0M
2026-02-234,044$20.49$82,861.56
2026-02-175,217$21.05$109,817.85
2026-02-135,880$20.39$119,893.2
2026-02-1016,690$19.71$328,959.9
2026-02-051,114$19.37$21,578.18
2026-02-041,931$18.18$35,105.58
2026-02-02826$18.39$15,190.14

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare DFH to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.