Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 6.5x earnings — a 82% discount to the sector average of 35.0x — DFH is in the lower valuation range. Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 2/9. Beneish M-Score of -1.91 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Dream Finders Homes, Inc. reveal a company currently generating value below its cost of capital, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -2.7%. This negative spread suggests that the firm is destroying shareholder wealth in absolute terms rather than creating it. A DuPont-style analysis highlights this inefficiency: while net margins sit at 5.0% and gross margins at 17.5%, these profitability metrics are being eroded by declining revenue growth of -2.9%. The capital structure appears fragile, with an Altman Z-Score of 2.5 hovering near the distress threshold, whereas the Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 indicates severe deterioration in financial health across multiple dimensions such as operating profitability and leverage ratios.
Valuation metrics present a stark divergence between market pricing and historical norms within the consumer cyclical sector. The stock trades at a current P/E ratio of 6.5x, which is significantly compressed relative to the sector average of 36.4x. This deep discount implies that the market has priced in substantial downside risk rather than anticipating robust future growth; indeed, any reasonable DCF model utilizing these inputs would likely yield a fair value far below current levels given the negative spread and shrinking top line. The low multiple does not necessarily reflect undervaluation but rather a consensus expectation of continued operational contraction and potential balance sheet stress.
Risk indicators further complicate the investment thesis, with a Beneish M-Score of -1.91 suggesting that earnings quality is unlikely to be manipulated downward, yet this credibility comes at the cost of deteriorating fundamentals. The combination of negative capital returns, declining revenue, and a precarious Z-score creates a high-risk profile where traditional growth drivers are absent. Investors must weigh whether the extreme valuation compression offers sufficient margin of safety against the probability of further fundamental degradation or if the market is correctly anticipating a prolonged period of value destruction before any potential turnaround occurs.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XHB or SLYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell DFH shares regardless of Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $16M of passive capital is structurally linked to DFH through 5 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on DFH's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 5 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Dream Finders Homes, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with DFH. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 5 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
DFH Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest DFH Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 5 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
DFH Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Dream Finders Homes, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Dream Finders Homes, Inc. converts -42% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 142% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.7%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 1,353 | $13.43 | $18,170.79 |
| 2026-05-13 | 197,796 | $13.02 | $2.6M |
| 2026-05-05 | 12,278 | $14.04 | $172,383.12 |
| 2026-04-30 | 1,661 | $14.15 | $23,503.15 |
| 2026-04-29 | 254 | $14.78 | $3,754.12 |
| 2026-04-20 | 4,761 | $14.82 | $70,558.02 |
| 2026-04-17 | 9 | $13.58 | $122.22 |
| 2026-04-08 | 290 | $13.42 | $3,891.8 |
| 2026-04-06 | 675 | $14.07 | $9,497.25 |
| 2026-03-27 | 783 | $14.21 | $11,126.43 |
| 2026-03-25 | 81,460 | $14.08 | $1.1M |
| 2026-03-23 | 14,716 | $13.82 | $203,375.12 |
| 2026-03-20 | 22,307 | $14.10 | $314,528.7 |
| 2026-03-17 | 1,291 | $15.77 | $20,359.07 |
| 2026-03-16 | 1,460 | $15.47 | $22,586.2 |
| 2026-03-11 | 176,486 | $15.80 | $2.8M |
| 2026-03-10 | 1,074 | $15.71 | $16,872.54 |
| 2026-03-05 | 1,754 | $17.57 | $30,817.78 |
| 2026-03-04 | 1,382 | $17.55 | $24,254.1 |
| 2026-03-03 | 11,627 | $17.71 | $205,914.17 |
| 2026-02-26 | 1,690 | $18.44 | $31,163.6 |
| 2026-02-25 | 18,724 | $19.20 | $359,500.8 |
| 2026-02-24 | 51,089 | $20.03 | $1.0M |
| 2026-02-23 | 4,044 | $20.49 | $82,861.56 |
| 2026-02-17 | 5,217 | $21.05 | $109,817.85 |
| 2026-02-13 | 5,880 | $20.39 | $119,893.2 |
| 2026-02-10 | 16,690 | $19.71 | $328,959.9 |
| 2026-02-05 | 1,114 | $19.37 | $21,578.18 |
| 2026-02-04 | 1,931 | $18.18 | $35,105.58 |
| 2026-02-02 | 826 | $18.39 | $15,190.14 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare DFH to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.