Entegris, Inc. (ENTG)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicENTG trades at 72.0x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 65.0x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 3.3.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Entegris, Inc. reveal a capital allocation profile that warrants scrutiny given the ROIC-WACC spread sits at just 4.6%, indicating limited value creation relative to cost of equity. This modest return is driven primarily by low asset turnover of 0.38x within a DuPont decomposition where net margins of 7.4% and leverage of 2.11x provide only partial support, resulting in an ROE of merely 6.0%. While the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 suggests moderate financial strength and the Beneish M-Score of -2.60 points to low earnings manipulation risk, these metrics contrast sharply with a revenue contraction of -1.4% year-over-year, signaling potential headwinds in core demand despite healthy gross margins near 44%.
Valuation multiples present a significant premium against the broader technology sector average; trading at 72.0x P/E compared to a peer group mean of 56.8x implies the market is pricing in substantial future growth that has not yet materialized, particularly as current earnings appear stagnant or declining. A discounted cash flow analysis suggests an intrinsic fair value of $56, which stands in stark contrast to the current multiple expansion embedded in the stock price. This divergence indicates that investors are currently assigning a high implied growth rate to the company's future prospects, a premise that may be fragile given the recent negative revenue trajectory and lack of demonstrated ROIC improvement.
Risk factors further complicate the investment thesis, highlighted by significant insider activity showing $29.6 million in net selling over the past 90 days, which often precedes downward revisions or reflects internal confidence issues absent from public filings. Although no specific Fama-French alpha data was provided to quantify style exposure, the combination of high valuation, shrinking top-line growth, and notable insider outflows creates a precarious risk/reward asymmetry where downside protection appears limited relative to the premium paid for future expectations.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 9.2% | 11.2% | 13.2% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $71 | $49 | $35 |
| 3% | $83 | $56 | $39 |
| 4% | $101 | $65 | $44 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $56 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like MDYV or VBK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ENTG shares regardless of Entegris, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.0B of passive capital is structurally linked to ENTG through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Entegris, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies FLEX LTD (FLEX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with ENTG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 16 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ENTG Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ENTG Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 16 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ENTG Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Entegris, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Entegris, Inc. converts 47% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 53% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-6.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 133,707 | $145.31 | $19.4M |
| 2026-05-12 | 11,431 | $149.15 | $1.7M |
| 2026-05-08 | 5,512 | $147.66 | $813,901.92 |
| 2026-05-07 | 6,205 | $155.86 | $967,111.3 |
| 2026-05-04 | 2 | $142.29 | $284.58 |
| 2026-04-30 | 1,851 | $149.37 | $276,483.87 |
| 2026-04-28 | 156,970 | $156.44 | $24.6M |
| 2026-04-20 | 180 | $146.06 | $26,290.8 |
| 2026-04-16 | 192 | $137.00 | $26,304 |
| 2026-04-08 | 2,180 | $118.55 | $258,439 |
| 2026-04-07 | 3,423 | $115.68 | $395,972.64 |
| 2026-04-06 | 18,469 | $116.40 | $2.1M |
| 2026-04-01 | 85 | $117.24 | $9,965.4 |
| 2026-03-30 | 2 | $113.59 | $227.18 |
| 2026-03-26 | 1,841 | $123.18 | $226,774.38 |
| 2026-03-25 | 105 | $121.67 | $12,775.35 |
| 2026-03-23 | 14 | $114.66 | $1,605.24 |
| 2026-03-20 | 1,378 | $115.86 | $159,655.08 |
| 2026-03-17 | 1,428 | $111.64 | $159,421.92 |
| 2026-03-11 | 1,195 | $116.88 | $139,671.6 |
| 2026-03-09 | 18 | $112.44 | $2,023.92 |
| 2026-03-03 | 516 | $135.50 | $69,918 |
| 2026-03-02 | 13,554 | $132.45 | $1.8M |
| 2026-02-26 | 11 | $137.34 | $1,510.74 |
| 2026-02-23 | 6 | $134.49 | $806.94 |
| 2026-02-20 | 33 | $132.67 | $4,378.11 |
| 2026-02-19 | 2 | $131.89 | $263.78 |
| 2026-02-12 | 44 | $137.79 | $6,062.76 |
| 2026-02-10 | 6 | $122.39 | $734.34 |
| 2026-02-09 | 5,135 | $122.37 | $628,369.95 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ENTG to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.