Technology

ESCO Technologies Inc. (ESE)

$7.1B
Market Cap
57.1
P/E Ratio
1.18
Beta
0.11%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 3/9Altman Z 6.5 SafeBeneish M -2.17 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC -4.8%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

ESE trades at 57.1x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 65.0x. Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9. Beneish M-Score of -2.17 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital efficiency profile reveals a significant divergence between operational returns and the cost of equity, with an ROIC-WACC spread contracting to -4.8%, indicating that current earnings generation fails to cover the required return on invested capital. Despite this compression in absolute value creation, profitability metrics remain robust, driven by high leverage within the DuPont framework as evidenced by a net margin expansion to 27.3% and gross margins holding at 42.1%. Fundamental stability checks present a mixed picture: while revenue growth accelerates at 19.2%, the low Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 suggests deteriorating financial strength, yet the Altman Z-Score of 6.5 and negative Beneish M-Score of -2.17 simultaneously point to low bankruptcy risk and a lack of earnings manipulation.

Valuation metrics reflect market expectations that are largely aligned with sector peers but imply aggressive future performance assumptions. The current P/E ratio of 57.1x sits marginally below the technology sector average of 58.2x, suggesting the stock is not materially overvalued relative to its industry group despite the negative ROIC spread. However, a DCF analysis places fair value at $166, which serves as a critical anchor for assessing whether current market pricing adequately compensates for the capital inefficiency and weak fundamental score delta. The valuation premium appears contingent on sustained margin expansion rather than improved asset turnover or leverage efficiency in the near term.

The risk-reward dynamic is characterized by high earnings quality tempered by structural capital constraints; while the negative M-Score alleviates concerns regarding accounting fraud, the combination of a negative ROIC spread and low Piotroski score introduces execution risk that may prevent value realization even if growth targets are met. Investors must weigh the attractive profitability margins against the likelihood that future cash flows will struggle to bridge the widening gap between returns on invested capital and the cost of financing without significant operational restructuring or asset base optimization.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →9.9%11.9%13.9%
2%$196$152$123
3%$219$166$132
4%$251$183$142

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $166 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

57.1x
ESE P/E
65.0x
Sector Avg
-12%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

3/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics
6.5
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.17
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

42.1%
Gross Margin
27.3%
Net Margin
7.1%
ROIC
11.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -4.8%— Negative spread.
+19.2%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+193.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
189.8M
Free Cash Flow
4%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

0.56x
Debt / Equity
1.35x
Current Ratio
9.7x
Interest Coverage
0.3x
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.65%
FCF Yield
245.4M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.25
Act: $1.35
+8.3%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $1.65
Act: $1.60
-2.8%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $2.13
Act: $2.32
+8.7%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.32
Act: $1.64
+24.2%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

29.8
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
4.55
Price/Book
209740
Avg Volume
$291.31
52W High
$134.78
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$585M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding ESE
0.17%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$354B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like IJT or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ESE shares regardless of ESCO Technologies Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $585M of passive capital is structurally linked to ESE through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ESE's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in ESCO Technologies Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

ESE Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
ESEEpicenterVBETFVXFETFVBKETFBELow RiskSANMMed RiskVIAVHigh RiskSMTCUnknownFORMLow Risk
ESE Price Drop (%)0

If ESCO Technologies Inc. (ESE) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Bloom Energy Corp. Class A (BE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with ESE. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 10 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

ESE Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
ESE

Float lock-up computed from 9 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

ESE Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does ESCO Technologies Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$190M
EBITDA
$245M
FCF Conversion
77%
Reinvestment Rate
23%
77% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
7.1%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-4.8%

ESCO Technologies Inc. converts 77% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-4.8%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-056$327.66$1,965.96
2026-05-011$323.95$323.95
2026-04-301$311.79$311.79
2026-04-295$317.01$1,585.05
2026-04-2411$318.83$3,507.13
2026-04-2311$311.00$3,421
2026-04-20100$314.92$31,492
2026-04-02182$293.15$53,353.3
2026-03-237$260.95$1,826.65
2026-02-26109$279.10$30,421.9
2026-02-184$266.00$1,064
2026-02-1713,813$268.41$3.7M
2026-02-134$272.76$1,091.04
2026-02-1211$283.19$3,115.09
2026-01-2126$220.50$5,733
2026-01-02283$195.39$55,295.37
2025-12-22267$198.78$53,074.26
2025-11-2817$212.93$3,619.81
2025-11-2617$217.43$3,696.31
2025-11-2514$224.36$3,141.04
2025-11-2412$215.50$2,586
2025-11-14118$216.79$25,581.22
2025-11-0714$218.92$3,064.88

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare ESE to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.