FUTU (FUTU)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicBelow-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9; Altman Z of 0.6 falls in the academic distress zone.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics present a striking dichotomy between exceptional profitability metrics and deteriorating financial stability indicators. While the firm generates substantial returns on invested capital at 18.6% alongside robust margin expansion—evidenced by an 82.0% gross margin and 40.1% net margin—the DuPont decomposition suggests earnings quality is being driven primarily by leverage rather than operational efficiency or asset turnover. This structural weakness is corroborated by distress signals: a low Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicates declining balance sheet strength, while an Altman Z-Score of 0.6 places the entity in the "grey zone" approaching insolvency risk. Conversely, the Beneish M-Score of -2.66 provides a counter-narrative by suggesting earnings are unlikely to be manipulated, yet this cannot fully offset the systemic risks implied by such low leverage ratios relative to equity value.
Valuation metrics currently reflect significant market skepticism regarding sustainability despite high growth momentum. Trading at 12.8x forward earnings is materially below historical norms and sector averages for companies exhibiting similar revenue expansion rates of 35.8% year-over-year, implying the market has heavily discounted future cash flow expectations. However, this compression contrasts sharply with a DCF-derived fair value estimate of $263 per share, which assumes sustained growth trajectories that may not align with current risk premiums. The disparity between the depressed trading multiple and the model-based intrinsic value suggests the stock is priced for distress rather than growth, creating an asymmetric setup where upside potential hinges entirely on a reversal in credit metrics or operational leverage improvements.
The risk/reward profile appears skewed heavily toward downside volatility given the proximity of the Altman Z-Score to bankruptcy territory. While insider activity and Fama-French alpha data are not provided to refine this view, the combination of high financial fragility with aggressive revenue scaling creates a precarious operating environment where margin preservation could be threatened by working capital needs or debt servicing obligations. Investors must weigh whether the current valuation discount adequately compensates for the elevated probability of balance sheet deterioration versus the possibility that low leverage is an accounting artifact rather than a genuine solvency threat.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $314 | $240 | $196 |
| 3% | $360 | $263 | $209 |
| 4% | $430 | $294 | $226 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $263 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like ARKF or SPDW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell FUTU shares regardless of FUTU's individual fundamentals. We estimate $21M of passive capital is structurally linked to FUTU through 3 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on FUTU's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 3 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in FUTU to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If FUTU (FUTU) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A (SHOP) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with FUTU. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 3 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
FUTU Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest FUTU Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 3 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
FUTU Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does FUTU convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
FUTU converts 454% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 | 296 | $157.21 | $46,534.16 |
| 2026-05-05 | 83 | $156.04 | $12,951.32 |
| 2026-04-16 | 5,409 | $164.72 | $890,970.48 |
| 2026-04-09 | 70 | $157.14 | $10,999.8 |
| 2026-04-06 | 192 | $140.16 | $26,910.72 |
| 2026-03-24 | 179 | $140.04 | $25,067.16 |
| 2026-03-23 | 13,300 | $135.02 | $1.8M |
| 2026-03-20 | 13,300 | $139.47 | $1.9M |
| 2026-03-12 | 15,822 | $152.64 | $2.4M |
| 2026-03-04 | 10 | $144.70 | $1,447 |
| 2026-02-26 | 6 | $151.72 | $910.32 |
| 2026-02-20 | 979 | $153.50 | $150,276.5 |
| 2026-01-30 | 837 | $164.88 | $138,004.56 |
| 2026-01-20 | 600 | $171.80 | $103,080 |
| 2026-01-16 | 5 | $176.50 | $882.5 |
| 2026-01-12 | 74 | $178.49 | $13,208.26 |
| 2026-01-05 | 465 | $178.46 | $82,983.9 |
| 2025-12-31 | 37 | $165.27 | $6,114.99 |
| 2025-12-30 | 2,038 | $166.03 | $338,369.14 |
| 2025-12-29 | 6,958 | $165.19 | $1.1M |
| 2025-12-26 | 6,954 | $164.67 | $1.1M |
| 2025-12-24 | 6,925 | $165.12 | $1.1M |
| 2025-12-15 | 400 | $171.45 | $68,580 |
| 2025-12-12 | 1 | $172.77 | $172.77 |
| 2025-11-24 | 1,000 | $161.52 | $161,520 |
| 2025-11-13 | 128 | $186.19 | $23,832.32 |
| 2025-11-12 | 13,197 | $186.56 | $2.5M |
| 2025-11-07 | 228 | $184.09 | $41,972.52 |
| 2025-11-06 | 7,609 | $187.68 | $1.4M |
| 2025-11-03 | 290 | $199.04 | $57,721.6 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare FUTU to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.