FUTU (FUTU)

$18.3B
Market Cap
12.8
P/E Ratio
0.38
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 3/9Altman Z 0.6 DistressBeneish M -2.66 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9; Altman Z of 0.6 falls in the academic distress zone.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics present a striking dichotomy between exceptional profitability metrics and deteriorating financial stability indicators. While the firm generates substantial returns on invested capital at 18.6% alongside robust margin expansion—evidenced by an 82.0% gross margin and 40.1% net margin—the DuPont decomposition suggests earnings quality is being driven primarily by leverage rather than operational efficiency or asset turnover. This structural weakness is corroborated by distress signals: a low Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicates declining balance sheet strength, while an Altman Z-Score of 0.6 places the entity in the "grey zone" approaching insolvency risk. Conversely, the Beneish M-Score of -2.66 provides a counter-narrative by suggesting earnings are unlikely to be manipulated, yet this cannot fully offset the systemic risks implied by such low leverage ratios relative to equity value.

Valuation metrics currently reflect significant market skepticism regarding sustainability despite high growth momentum. Trading at 12.8x forward earnings is materially below historical norms and sector averages for companies exhibiting similar revenue expansion rates of 35.8% year-over-year, implying the market has heavily discounted future cash flow expectations. However, this compression contrasts sharply with a DCF-derived fair value estimate of $263 per share, which assumes sustained growth trajectories that may not align with current risk premiums. The disparity between the depressed trading multiple and the model-based intrinsic value suggests the stock is priced for distress rather than growth, creating an asymmetric setup where upside potential hinges entirely on a reversal in credit metrics or operational leverage improvements.

The risk/reward profile appears skewed heavily toward downside volatility given the proximity of the Altman Z-Score to bankruptcy territory. While insider activity and Fama-French alpha data are not provided to refine this view, the combination of high financial fragility with aggressive revenue scaling creates a precarious operating environment where margin preservation could be threatened by working capital needs or debt servicing obligations. Investors must weigh whether the current valuation discount adequately compensates for the elevated probability of balance sheet deterioration versus the possibility that low leverage is an accounting artifact rather than a genuine solvency threat.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$314$240$196
3%$360$263$209
4%$430$294$226

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $263 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

3/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics
0.6
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.66
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

82.0%
Gross Margin
40.1%
Net Margin
18.6%
ROIC
+35.8%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+27.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
30.8B
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

4.67x
Debt / Equity
1.19x
Current Ratio
466.97%
FCF Yield
6.8B
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $15.14
Act: $19.68
+30.0%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $16.61
Act: $18.86
+13.5%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $20.48
Act: $23.40
+14.2%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $23.79
Act: $24.38
+2.5%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

9.7
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
3.59
Price/Book
2M
Avg Volume
$202.53
52W High
$70.60
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$21M
Tracked Passive Exposure
3
ETFs Holding FUTU
0.06%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$39B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like ARKF or SPDW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell FUTU shares regardless of FUTU's individual fundamentals. We estimate $21M of passive capital is structurally linked to FUTU through 3 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on FUTU's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 3 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in FUTU to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

FUTU Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
FUTUEpicenterSPDWETFCWIETFARKFETFSHOPLow RiskCOINLow RiskSMSNUnknownHOODHigh RiskTSMLow Risk
FUTU Price Drop (%)0

If FUTU (FUTU) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A (SHOP) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with FUTU. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 3 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

FUTU Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
FUTU

ETFs with Highest FUTU Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 3 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

FUTU Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does FUTU convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$30.8B
EBITDA
$6.8B
FCF Conversion
454%
Reinvestment Rate
-354%
454% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

FUTU converts 454% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-06296$157.21$46,534.16
2026-05-0583$156.04$12,951.32
2026-04-165,409$164.72$890,970.48
2026-04-0970$157.14$10,999.8
2026-04-06192$140.16$26,910.72
2026-03-24179$140.04$25,067.16
2026-03-2313,300$135.02$1.8M
2026-03-2013,300$139.47$1.9M
2026-03-1215,822$152.64$2.4M
2026-03-0410$144.70$1,447
2026-02-266$151.72$910.32
2026-02-20979$153.50$150,276.5
2026-01-30837$164.88$138,004.56
2026-01-20600$171.80$103,080
2026-01-165$176.50$882.5
2026-01-1274$178.49$13,208.26
2026-01-05465$178.46$82,983.9
2025-12-3137$165.27$6,114.99
2025-12-302,038$166.03$338,369.14
2025-12-296,958$165.19$1.1M
2025-12-266,954$164.67$1.1M
2025-12-246,925$165.12$1.1M
2025-12-15400$171.45$68,580
2025-12-121$172.77$172.77
2025-11-241,000$161.52$161,520
2025-11-13128$186.19$23,832.32
2025-11-1213,197$186.56$2.5M
2025-11-07228$184.09$41,972.52
2025-11-067,609$187.68$1.4M
2025-11-03290$199.04$57,721.6

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare FUTU to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.