ETF · Broad Market

CWI(CWI)

$39.52
-0.95%
Expense Ratio
$2.3B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
97.3%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards "Other" industries, which account for nearly three-quarters of its holdings, with Technology being the second-largest sector exposure at around 9%. This suggests that CWI may be positioned to benefit from broader market trends rather than specific sectors. The fund's geographic exposure and market-cap profile are not explicitly stated in the provided data.

The top holdings reveal a mix of large-cap technology companies, including TSM, which is the largest holding at nearly 5% of the portfolio. ASML, another prominent player in the semiconductor industry, also makes up a notable portion of CWI's assets. The fund's valuation posture appears to be relatively rich, with weighted P/E and P/B ratios above 19x and 38x, respectively. A macro environment characterized by strong demand for technology products and services could be favorable for this portfolio, while rising interest rates or a slowdown in the tech sector might pose challenges.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 09:30:31.115185+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 85/100

The investment theme implied by the CWI ticker is a focus on Chinese equities, yet the provided holdings list reveals significant diversification beyond this specific geography. While top positions include major technology names like TSM and ASML which have substantial Asian operations, other constituents such as HSBA (UK), RY and TD (Canada), SHEL (Netherlands/US), AZN (Ireland/Global), and NESN (Switzerland) are non-Chinese entities with no direct thematic link to the fund's likely name. This mix of global blue-chip stocks alongside select Chinese names suggests the fund may be utilizing broad market leaders for stability rather than maintaining a strict geographic or sectoral purity, potentially diluting the intended exposure to China-specific growth drivers.

Sector coherence presents another layer of complexity regarding the fund's differentiation from standard indices. The technology allocation stands at 8.8%, driven by holdings like TSM and ROP, but this weight is fragmented across eleven different companies rather than concentrating on a specific Chinese tech sub-sector. Furthermore, meaningful exposures to Financial Services (4.4%), Energy (2.2%), and Healthcare (1.3%) introduce broad market characteristics that mirror the composition of wider global indices more closely than a specialized thematic vehicle would typically exhibit. With only 16% concentration in the top ten holdings, the portfolio lacks the sharp focus often seen in pure-play thematic funds, indicating it functions as a diversified global equity basket with incidental Chinese exposure rather than a dedicated China strategy.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 09:19:11.639135+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The CWI ETF exhibits a distinct sector allocation profile that diverges sharply from broad market indices, revealing an investment thesis heavily weighted toward specific European and global equities rather than diversified industry exposure. While the Technology sector accounts for nearly nine percent of assets, it is not the dominant force; instead, the fund's structure suggests a deliberate avoidance of heavy concentration in any single traditional industrial or consumer category. The presence of significant holdings in Financial Services, Energy, and Industrials alongside Technology indicates a strategy that may prioritize specific geographic exposures or thematic bets over pure sectoral rotation, as these sectors collectively represent only a fraction of the total portfolio weight compared to what is seen in large-cap growth funds.

This allocation pattern highlights notable concentration risks despite the seemingly balanced spread across eleven sectors. The fact that the top ten holdings comprise just sixteen percent of assets suggests a low-concentration approach within individual positions, yet the sheer number of small allocations in many categories implies a broad but shallow net exposure to most industries. For instance, while Technology holds 11 names, other sectors like Utilities and Communication Services hold only four or five each with minimal weightings, potentially limiting the fund's ability to capitalize on sector-specific rallies outside its primary focus areas. The inclusion of non-standard tickers such as A000660 alongside major players like TSM and ASML further underscores a unique selection criteria that may not align with standard factor tilts toward large-cap growth or value, instead pointing toward a specialized mandate focused on particular regions or market segments where traditional sector definitions are less relevant.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 23:39:58.972146+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share CWI's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of CWI's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
SPDWSPDW$36B62373.9%
VEUVEU$86B40566.8%
VXUSVXUS$624B40266.3%
VEAVanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares$290B39961.8%
VTVT$80B20052.3%

74% of CWI's portfolio by weight is also held by SPDW, which commands 15× more assets under management. When SPDW receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging CWI's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofCWI's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

19.0x
Weighted P/E
37.69x
Weighted P/B
$132B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 24% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

0100020003000400057
Well Diversified
Top 5: 11.9%Top 10: 16.2%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Large Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Other77.1%Technology9.5%Financial Services4.9%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
25% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
Moderate

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
2%
0–3 Weak
11%
4–6 Average
11%
7–9 Strong

Based on 25% of fund weight with Piotroski data.

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
54%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
TTM Yield
Safe
Dividend Durability
54% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside CWI collectively pay out 54% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is a sustainable payout level with moderate room for dividend growth. Based on 18% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+23.4%
ETF 1Y Return
+29.4%
Wtd Earnings Growth
-6.0%
Multiple Contraction
Earnings

CWI is up 23.4% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +29.4%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 6.0% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 23% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of CWI's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

79% Creators
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)12.6%
Value Destroyers3.4%

Of CWI's analyzed weight, 79% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 21% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 16% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

SEVERE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

100/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership56.2%
Most Crowded HoldingNA (2594.1%)
Least CrowdedTSM (0.0%)
Coverage19% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

CWI has a Passive Crowding Score of 100/100. On average, 56.2% of the market capitalization of CWI's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. In the event of a broad sell-off, CWI faces elevated "gap-down" risk — as passive redemptions force simultaneous selling of constituents where a large portion of the float is not actively trading.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration16.2%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1TSM
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR SP ADR
Technology
4.67%
30.7x9/9
2SMSN
SAMSUNG ELECTR GDR REG S
2.34%
3ASML
ASML HOLDING NV
Technology
2.00%
56.8x8/9
4A000660
SK HYNIX INC
1.89%
5HSBA
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC
1.02%
6700
TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD
1.01%
7RY
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
Financial Services
0.95%
20.0x3/9
8ROP
ROCHE HOLDING AG
Technology
0.82%
22.7x5/9
9NOVN
NOVARTIS AG REG
0.77%
10NESN
NESTLE SA REG
0.74%
11AZN
ASTRAZENECA PLC
Healthcare
0.70%
25.5x7/9
128306
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GRO
0.70%
13TD
TORONTO DOMINION BANK
Financial Services
0.68%
20.7x4/9
14SIE
SIEMENS AG REG
0.68%
15SHEL
SHELL PLC
Energy
0.67%
13.3x5/9
The bottom 1102 stocks in CWI account for only 80.4% of the total fund weight.Only the top 50 holdings are shown. Total holdings: 1,117.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how CWI’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-07-19

15 holdings · 19.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1TSM4.67%315,067
2SMSN2.34%15,083
3ASML2.00%30,144
4A0006601.89%41,865
5HSBA1.02%1,396,745
67001.01%452,200
7RY0.95%121,737
8ROP0.82%55,579
9NOVN0.77%140,115
10NESN0.74%195,554
11AZN0.70%114,113
1283060.70%862,900
13TD0.68%152,337
14SIE0.68%60,213
15SHEL0.67%432,262

2026-07-18

15 holdings · 19.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1TSM4.67%315,067
2SMSN2.34%15,083
3ASML2.00%30,144
4A0006601.89%41,865
5HSBA1.02%1,396,745
67001.01%452,200
7RY0.95%121,737
8ROP0.82%55,579
9NOVN0.77%140,115
10NESN0.74%195,554
11AZN0.70%114,113
1283060.70%862,900
13TD0.68%152,337
14SIE0.68%60,213
15SHEL0.67%432,262

2026-07-17

15 holdings · 19.8% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1TSM4.75%315,067
2SMSN2.39%15,083
3A0006602.11%41,865
4ASML1.92%30,144
5HSBA1.00%1,396,745
67000.98%452,200
7RY0.95%121,737
8ROP0.82%55,579
9NOVN0.76%140,115
10NESN0.73%195,554
1183060.71%862,900
12AZN0.69%114,113
13TD0.68%152,337
14SIE0.67%60,213
15SHEL0.66%432,262

2026-07-16

15 holdings · 19.8% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1TSM4.79%315,067
2SMSN2.55%15,083
3ASML1.94%30,144
4A0006601.94%41,865
5HSBA1.01%1,396,745
67000.95%452,200
7RY0.94%121,737
8ROP0.81%55,579
9NOVN0.77%140,115
10NESN0.73%195,554
1183060.69%862,900
12AZN0.68%114,113
13SIE0.68%60,213
14TD0.68%152,337
15SHEL0.66%432,262

2026-07-15

15 holdings · 19.7% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1TSM4.83%315,067
2SMSN2.44%15,083
3ASML1.93%30,144
4A0006601.87%41,865
5HSBA0.99%1,396,745
67000.96%452,200
7RY0.93%121,737
8ROP0.82%55,579
9NOVN0.78%140,115
10NESN0.74%195,554
11AZN0.70%114,113
1283060.68%862,900
13SIE0.68%60,213
14TD0.67%152,337
15SHEL0.65%432,262

2026-07-14

15 holdings · 20.2% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1TSM4.91%315,067
2SMSN2.62%15,083
3A0006602.18%41,865
4ASML1.94%30,144
5HSBA0.99%1,396,745
67000.95%452,200
7RY0.92%121,737
8ROP0.83%55,579
9NOVN0.77%140,115
10NESN0.72%195,554
11AZN0.71%114,113
12SIE0.67%60,213
1383060.66%862,900
14TD0.66%152,337
15SHEL0.63%432,262

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

16.3%
Annual Volatility
1.05
Sharpe (1Y)
0.78
Sharpe (3Y)
-13.9%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-29.4%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove CWI Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:-0.95%(2026-07-17)

Top Contributors

+0.018%
+0.008%
+0.002%

Top Detractors

-0.021%
-0.042%
-0.130%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Technical Setup

AI Generated

CWI is currently trading at $39.59, a price point that sits within the immediate context of its recent market performance without explicit directional signals from this single data value alone. The absence of specific trend lines or moving average crossovers in the provided snapshot prevents a definitive assessment of whether current momentum represents a structural shift in valuation or a fragile accumulation phase susceptible to rapid correction. Without accompanying volatility metrics, drawdown history, or fundamental earnings context, it remains technically ambiguous whether this price level reflects a stable equilibrium or a precarious inflection point where minor catalysts could trigger significant repositioning by market participants. The singular data point of $39.59 offers limited insight into the broader risk dynamics typically required to distinguish between robust growth and speculative positioning. In isolation, this figure does not reveal the depth of recent drawdowns or the intensity of price swings that would inform an analysis of downside protection or upside potential. Consequently, any interpretation of the current market stance relies heavily on external factors not present in this specific dataset, leaving the structural integrity of the trend undetermined and highlighting the necessity for a more comprehensive technical framework to evaluate true risk exposure accurately.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How CWI’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-07-1994 snapshots
Other77.1%
Technology9.5%
Financial Services4.9%
Energy2.1%
Industrials1.5%
Healthcare1.3%
Basic Materials1.2%
Consumer Cyclical0.9%
Consumer Defensive0.6%
Utilities0.4%
Communication Services0.4%
0.1%
Change since 2026-03-30
Technology
+1.0%
Financial Services
+0.5%
Energy
-0.5%
Other
-0.3%
Healthcare
-0.2%
Utilities
-0.1%
2026-03-302026-07-19

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.