GAP (GAP)

$8.8B
Market Cap
11.1
P/E Ratio
2.24
Beta
2.83%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 2.8 Gray ZoneBeneish M -2.71 CleanROIC−WACC -6.0%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 2.8.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The company demonstrates robust capital efficiency with a Return on Invested Capital of 11.2%, indicating that operating assets generate returns exceeding the typical cost of equity, though specific WACC figures are absent to quantify the spread precisely. The DuPont decomposition reveals an ROE of 25.9% driven primarily by high financial leverage (Equity Multiplier at 3.64x) rather than operational expansion, as revenue growth remains stagnant at just 1.3%. Despite this leveraged structure, quality metrics appear strong with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.77, suggesting low earnings manipulation risk while the gross margin stands healthy at 41.3% against a thin net margin of 5.6%.

Valuation appears compressed relative to historical norms or sector peers given the current P/E multiple of 11.1x, yet this discount contrasts with a Discounted Cash Flow model implying fair value near $16, which suggests the market may be pricing in slower growth than the DCF assumptions warrant. The divergence between the modest revenue trajectory and the elevated ROE implies that valuation is currently supported by balance sheet leverage rather than top-line momentum. Market participants appear to have incorporated conservative expectations into share prices, potentially creating a gap if future earnings can sustainably maintain current profitability levels without relying on increased debt ratios.

Significant insider activity warrants attention as net selling of over $14 million occurred within the last 90 days, which often signals management's view that shares are currently undervalued or reflects personal liquidity needs rather than fundamental deterioration. While no specific risk factor deltas or Fama-French alpha data were provided to adjust for size or value premiums, the combination of insider outflows and stagnant revenue growth presents a counter-narrative to the attractive DCF-derived valuation floor. Investors must weigh whether the low multiple adequately compensates for the lack of organic top-line expansion before assuming the stock offers immediate upside potential relative to its intrinsic cash flow estimates.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →14.3%16.3%18.3%
2%$17$15$14
3%$18$16$14
4%$18$16$14

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=16.3%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $16 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
2.8
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.71
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

40.8%
Gross Margin
5.3%
Net Margin
10.4%
ROIC
16.3%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -6.0%— Negative spread.
+1.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-3.3%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
823.0M
Free Cash Flow
30%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

5.6%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
1.27x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
3.64x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
25.9%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

2.32x
Debt / Equity
1.75x
Current Ratio
13.2x
Interest Coverage
-0.7x
Net Debt / EBITDA
10.74%
FCF Yield
1.7B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$14M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
11
Sale Transactions
2026-03-23GILLIGAN SARAHSold 3/8 qtrsSale$2M
2026-03-20BARBEITO HORACIOSold 5/8 qtrsSale$3M
2026-03-19O'CONNELL KATRINASold 3/8 qtrsSale$201,419
2026-03-19BREITBARD MARKSold 4/8 qtrsSale$201,404
2026-03-18O'CONNELL KATRINASold 3/8 qtrsSale$278,489

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.45
Act: $0.51
+13.2%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.55
Act: $0.57
+4.0%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.59
Act: $0.62
+5.6%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.45
Act: $0.45
-0.7%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

9.1
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
2.31
Price/Book
8M
Avg Volume
$29.36
52W High
$16.99
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$377M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding GAP
0.08%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$468B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XRT or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell GAP shares regardless of GAP's individual fundamentals. We estimate $377M of passive capital is structurally linked to GAP through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on GAP's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in GAP to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

GAP Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
GAPEpicenterVBETFVYMETFVXFETFTGTLow RiskDKSMed RiskMUSALow RiskBJLow RiskBURLLow Risk
GAP Price Drop (%)0

If GAP (GAP) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TARGET CORP (TGT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with GAP. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 13 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

GAP Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
GAP

Float lock-up computed from 14 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

GAP Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does GAP convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$823M
EBITDA
$1.7B
FCF Conversion
48%
Reinvestment Rate
52%
48% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
10.4%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-6.0%

GAP converts 48% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 52% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-6.0%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-11124$23.37$2,897.88
2026-05-0814,794$23.90$353,576.6
2026-05-07920$24.56$22,595.2
2026-05-062,589$23.64$61,203.96
2026-05-042$24.68$49.36
2026-05-01336,305$24.59$8.3M
2026-04-28209,866$25.13$5.3M
2026-04-221$26.65$26.65
2026-04-2034,350$27.02$928,137
2026-04-161,615$25.80$41,667
2026-04-1510,254$24.91$255,427.14
2026-04-14522$25.28$13,196.16
2026-04-1044,012$26.36$1.2M
2026-04-09253,885$25.43$6.5M
2026-04-06506$24.61$12,452.66
2026-03-27304$25.07$7,621.28
2026-03-2312$23.91$286.92
2026-03-2032,093$24.08$772,799.44
2026-03-1777,524$23.34$1.8M
2026-03-09147,739$23.28$3.4M
2026-03-066$27.20$163.2
2026-03-02425$28.04$11,917
2026-02-17106$27.67$2,933.02
2026-02-09500$29.13$14,565
2026-02-021,000$27.98$27,980
2026-01-2996,215$26.98$2.6M
2026-01-2348$27.21$1,306.08
2026-01-205,762$26.73$154,018.26
2026-01-145,336$27.43$146,366.48
2026-01-09674$28.42$19,155.08

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare GAP to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.