ITUB (ITUB)

$87.5B
Market Cap
10.4
P/E Ratio
0.21
Beta
1.33%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Altman Z 0.1 Distress

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 0.1.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%6%8%
2%$158$158$100
3%$208$208$119
4%$308$308$146

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=6.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $208 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
0.1
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

27.2%
Net Margin
6.0%
WACC
+4.2%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+9.2%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
27.4B
Free Cash Flow
177%
FCF Payout Ratio

⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

27.2%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.05x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
14.26x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
20.9%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

13.26x
Debt / Equity
16.47%
FCF Yield

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.17
Act: $0.19
+10.0%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.18
Act: $0.19
+2.4%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.20
Act: $0.20
-1.0%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.20
Act: $0.20
+0.2%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

8.3
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
2.24
Price/Book
27M
Avg Volume
$9.60
52W High
$4.97
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$212M
Tracked Passive Exposure
4
ETFs Holding ITUB
0.08%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$253B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like SPEM or CWI, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ITUB shares regardless of ITUB's individual fundamentals. We estimate $212M of passive capital is structurally linked to ITUB through 4 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ITUB's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 4 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in ITUB to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

ITUB Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
ITUBEpicenterVWOETFVEUETFSPEMETF2330UnknownTSMLow Risk700Unknown700Unknown9988Unknown
ITUB Price Drop (%)0

If ITUB (ITUB) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (2330) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with ITUB. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 4 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

ITUB Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
ITUB

Float lock-up computed from 4 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-052,915$8.47$24,690.05
2026-05-013,785$8.70$32,929.5
2026-04-16231,814$9.39$2.2M
2026-04-0163,663$8.38$533,495.94
2026-03-30203$7.87$1,597.61
2026-03-13297,817$8.10$2.4M
2026-03-044$8.40$33.6
2026-02-191,952$9.17$17,899.84
2026-02-09766$8.99$6,886.34
2026-01-3013,458$8.93$120,179.94
2026-01-285$8.78$43.9
2026-01-23260,782$8.21$2.1M
2026-01-136,731$7.39$49,742.09
2025-12-301,739$7.02$12,207.78
2025-12-291,426$7.31$10,424.06
2025-12-1513,727$7.32$100,481.64
2025-12-0523,289$8.07$187,942.23
2025-12-03308$7.89$2,430.12
2025-12-02239$7.69$1,837.91
2025-12-019,964$7.80$77,719.2
2025-10-31250$7.33$1,832.5
2025-10-24250$7.10$1,775
2025-10-2321,412$7.07$151,382.84
2025-10-1639,300$6.87$269,991
2025-10-14123,922$6.87$851,344.14
2025-10-03100$7.12$712
2025-10-01931$7.34$6,833.54

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare ITUB to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.