JBTM (JBTM)

$7.1B
Market Cap
42.0
P/E Ratio
0.92
Beta
0.29%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 3/9Beneish M -1.42 Flag (> −2.22)

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9. Beneish M-Score of -1.42 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics present a stark dichotomy between explosive top-line expansion and deteriorating profitability quality. While revenue growth of 121.3% YoY suggests aggressive scaling, the company's negative net margin of -1.3% indicates that this growth is currently eroding bottom line returns rather than enhancing them. This inefficiency is underscored by a low Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of just 0.6%, signaling that capital deployment is failing to generate sufficient economic value relative to the cost of equity. Compounding these concerns, a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 points toward significant financial weakness and declining fundamentals, while the DuPont decomposition likely reveals that margin compression or asset turnover issues are driving down overall Return on Equity despite high leverage or specific operational headwinds.

Valuation metrics further highlight the tension between current market pricing and intrinsic value estimates. The stock trades at a premium P/E ratio of 42.0x, which implies the market is anticipating sustained high growth that has not yet translated into net earnings power. This multiple stands in contrast to a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggesting a fair value of $137, creating ambiguity regarding whether current prices reflect realistic future cash flows or speculative optimism about margin recovery. The divergence between the high revenue trajectory and the negative earnings base suggests that the market is pricing in a turnaround narrative where gross margins of 35.1% eventually convert into profitability, yet such an assumption carries substantial execution risk given the weak historical scorecard.

Risk-adjusted analysis reveals further cautionary signals through alternative scoring models and implied volatility profiles. A Beneish M-Score of -1.42 indicates low probability of earnings manipulation, which contrasts sharply with the poor Piotroski F-Score; this divergence suggests that while financial statements may be clean, operational fundamentals are genuinely weak rather than artificially inflated. The combination of a negative ROIC and an expanding revenue base without corresponding profit generation creates a high-risk environment where standard valuation multiples become unreliable indicators of future performance. Investors must weigh the potential for margin expansion against the immediate reality of capital destruction as measured by the negligible return on invested assets.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$173$120$88
3%$207$137$98
4%$259$160$110

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $137 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

3/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics
-1.42
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

35.1%
Gross Margin
-1.3%
Net Margin
0.6%
ROIC
+121.3%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-159.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
238.1M
Free Cash Flow
9%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

0.83x
Debt / Equity
0.98x
Current Ratio
0.5x
Interest Coverage
4.1x
Net Debt / EBITDA
318.2M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.84
Act: $0.97
+15.8%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.28
Act: $1.49
+16.4%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $1.50
Act: $1.94
+28.9%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.93
Act: $1.98
+2.7%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

14.6
Forward P/E
1.22
PEG Ratio
1.59
Price/Book
597009
Avg Volume
$170.19
52W High
$107.64
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$399M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding JBTM
0.11%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$347B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like SLYG or SPSM, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell JBTM shares regardless of JBTM's individual fundamentals. We estimate $399M of passive capital is structurally linked to JBTM through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on JBTM's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in JBTM to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

JBTM Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
JBTMEpicenterVBETFVXFETFVBKETFCATLow RiskGELow RiskGEVLow RiskBELow RiskRTXMed Risk
JBTM Price Drop (%)0

If JBTM (JBTM) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with JBTM. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 9 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

JBTM Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
JBTM

Float lock-up computed from 9 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

JBTM Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does JBTM convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$238M
EBITDA
$318M
FCF Conversion
75%
Reinvestment Rate
25%
75% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

JBTM converts 75% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-061$131.29$131.29
2026-05-054$116.44$465.76
2026-05-01336$118.10$39,681.6
2026-04-284$131.96$527.84
2026-04-27239$130.17$31,110.63
2026-04-2318$131.36$2,364.48
2026-04-20171,079$132.23$22.6M
2026-04-0854$125.39$6,771.06
2026-03-25107$126.67$13,553.69
2026-03-23141$127.00$17,907
2026-03-1911$130.13$1,431.43
2026-03-18113$134.51$15,199.63
2026-03-1783$129.09$10,714.47
2026-03-162,241$129.64$290,523.24
2026-03-124,114$142.03$584,311.42
2026-03-113,922$141.01$553,041.22
2026-03-0627,459$152.75$4.2M
2026-03-036,462$154.39$997,668.18
2026-02-252,576$163.86$422,103.36
2026-02-249,464$163.40$1.5M
2026-02-203,641$162.58$591,953.78
2026-02-19205$163.05$33,425.25
2026-02-17658$163.74$107,740.92
2026-02-13534$163.36$87,234.24
2026-02-122,686$165.36$444,156.96
2026-02-11692$166.00$114,872
2026-02-056,836$165.43$1.1M
2026-01-281,711$155.09$265,358.99
2026-01-2779$155.55$12,288.45
2026-01-263$154.23$462.69

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare JBTM to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.