LAUR (LAUR)

$4.9B
Market Cap
18.1
P/E Ratio
0.67
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 4.4 SafeBeneish M -2.35 CleanROIC−WACC +9.8%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 4.4.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of LAUR demonstrate a robust capital allocation profile, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of +9.8%, indicating the firm generates returns on invested capital significantly above its cost of equity. This efficiency is further validated by strong profitability drivers; a DuPont decomposition reveals healthy operating leverage with net margins at 16.6% and gross margins at 28.3%, supported by revenue growth of 8.6%. Qualitative financial health metrics reinforce this operational stability, as the company posts a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, an Altman Z-Score of 4.4 well within safe territory to avoid distress, and a Beneish M-Score of -2.35 that suggests earnings are unlikely to be manipulated.

Valuation metrics present a mixed picture relative to historical norms and intrinsic value models. The current P/E ratio of 18.1x requires context against sector averages and the company's own history to determine if it represents premium pricing or reasonable growth expectations. While specific DCF calculations suggest a fair value of $78, this figure implies a set trajectory for future cash flows that may not yet be fully reflected in current market prices; however, without explicit historical P/E data or sector benchmarks provided in the input, determining whether the 18.1x multiple is over- or undervalued remains an open assessment based solely on these isolated figures.

Risk and reward dynamics appear balanced given the absence of extreme distress signals or aggressive earnings management indicators. The combination of a high Piotroski score, low manipulation risk per Beneish, and solid Altman metrics points to a stable business model with limited downside volatility from fundamental deterioration. Conversely, the lack of provided data regarding Fama-French alpha adjustments or recent insider trading activity prevents a complete synthesis of short-term sentiment shifts versus long-term structural value creation inherent in this equity.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6.9%8.9%10.9%
2%$98$68$52
3%$120$78$57
4%$157$92$64

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=8.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $78 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
4.4
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.35
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

28.3%
Gross Margin
16.6%
Net Margin
18.8%
ROIC
8.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +9.8%— Positive value creation spread.
+8.6%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-5.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
263.1M
Free Cash Flow
0%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

0.86x
Debt / Equity
0.67x
Current Ratio
38.6x
Interest Coverage
-0.1x
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.48%
FCF Yield
522.4M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.19
Act: $-0.13
+31.6%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.72
Act: $0.79
+9.7%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.23
Act: $0.25
+8.7%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.79
Act: $1.15
+45.3%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

13.8
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
4.11
Price/Book
2M
Avg Volume
$37.91
52W High
$17.91
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$100M
Tracked Passive Exposure
7
ETFs Holding LAUR
0.11%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$91B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like SLYG or SPSM, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell LAUR shares regardless of LAUR's individual fundamentals. We estimate $100M of passive capital is structurally linked to LAUR through 7 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on LAUR's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in LAUR to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

LAUR Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
LAUREpicenterVBKETFVTWOETFSPSMETFAMZNLow RiskTSLALow RiskHDLow RiskMCDLow RiskBELow Risk
LAUR Price Drop (%)0

If LAUR (LAUR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with LAUR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

LAUR Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
LAUR

Float lock-up computed from 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

LAUR Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does LAUR convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$263M
EBITDA
$522M
FCF Conversion
50%
Reinvestment Rate
50%
50% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
18.8%
ROIC − WACC Spread
9.8%

LAUR converts 50% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 9.8% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-141,010$32.67$32,996.7
2026-05-08170,203$32.17$5.5M
2026-05-0638$32.30$1,227.4
2026-05-04351$31.24$10,965.24
2026-04-0880$34.30$2,744
2026-03-2430$34.35$1,030.5
2026-03-2325,370$33.29$844,567.3
2026-03-181,155$34.24$39,547.2
2026-03-049,052$32.57$294,823.64
2026-02-202$33.99$67.98
2026-02-185,610$34.75$194,947.5
2025-12-3047$33.86$1,591.42
2025-12-105$30.30$151.5
2025-11-1261$31.14$1,899.54
2025-11-04193$29.28$5,651.04

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare LAUR to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.