LGIH (LGIH)

$888M
Market Cap
12.3
P/E Ratio
1.79
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 2/9Altman Z 2.6 Gray ZoneBeneish M -1.96 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC -6.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 2/9. Beneish M-Score of -1.96 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of LGIH present a pronounced value destruction dynamic, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -6.4%, indicating the firm generates returns significantly below its cost of capital over recent periods. This inefficiency is compounded by a deteriorating financial health profile; while the Beneish M-Score of -1.96 suggests management earnings manipulation risks are low and reported figures appear credible, the Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 signals severe operational distress. The DuPont decomposition reveals that despite a respectable gross margin of 20.7%, the net margin has contracted to just 4.2% amid a catastrophic -22.6% revenue decline year-over-year, suggesting the company is struggling with both top-line erosion and an inability to maintain profitability on shrinking sales volumes.

Valuation metrics currently reflect this distress but may not fully account for the quality of earnings or capital allocation efficiency implied by the negative spread. Trading at a 12.3x P/E ratio, the stock appears compressed relative to typical growth expectations yet remains priced without explicit downside protection given the revenue contraction. A standard DCF analysis would likely yield a depressed fair value due to the persistent -6.4% return gap and lack of visible earnings recovery in the near term. The market price seemingly incorporates significant uncertainty regarding whether operational leverage can be restored, as current multiples do not yet reflect a normalized trajectory for margin expansion or revenue stabilization following such steep declines.

Risk factors are heavily weighted toward continued capital erosion rather than speculative upside potential at these levels. With an Altman Z-Score of 2.6 placing the entity in the grey zone between safe and distressed, investors must weigh the low likelihood of earnings restatement against the high probability of further value decay if revenue trends do not reverse promptly. The absence of positive Fama-French alpha drivers or insider accumulation data reinforces a defensive posture where downside protection is limited by the company's current trajectory. Ultimately, the risk/reward profile appears skewed toward capital preservation challenges rather than asymmetric opportunity, as fundamental metrics suggest ongoing operational friction and inefficient capital deployment until revenue dynamics stabilize.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

2/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics
2.6
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-1.96
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

20.7%
Gross Margin
4.3%
Net Margin
1.7%
ROIC
8.1%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -6.4%— Negative spread.
-22.6%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-63.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-140.9M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.87x
Debt / Equity
37.18x
Current Ratio
19.1x
Net Debt / EBITDA
-5.65%
FCF Yield
84.1M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.63
Act: $0.17
-73.1%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.31
Act: $1.36
+3.8%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.93
Act: $0.85
-8.8%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.91
Act: $0.97
+6.2%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

11.2
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
0.42
Price/Book
448706
Avg Volume
$69.50
52W High
$33.55
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$37M
Tracked Passive Exposure
5
ETFs Holding LGIH
0.10%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$37B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XHB or SLYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell LGIH shares regardless of LGIH's individual fundamentals. We estimate $37M of passive capital is structurally linked to LGIH through 5 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on LGIH's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 5 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in LGIH to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

LGIH Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
LGIHEpicenterSPSMETFSPTMETFVCRETFAMZNLow RiskTSLALow RiskNVDALow RiskAAPLLow RiskHDLow Risk
LGIH Price Drop (%)0

If LGIH (LGIH) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with LGIH. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 5 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

LGIH Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
LGIH

Float lock-up computed from 5 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

LGIH Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does LGIH convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$-140,897,000
EBITDA
$84M
FCF Conversion
-168%
Reinvestment Rate
268%
-168% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
1.7%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-6.4%

LGIH converts -168% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 268% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-6.4%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-03-3149$37.75$1,849.75
2026-03-3081$37.73$3,056.13
2026-03-2516,658$37.35$622,176.3
2026-03-23169$34.24$5,786.56
2026-03-174,688$41.71$195,536.48
2026-03-04583$49.04$28,590.32
2026-02-2446$53.19$2,446.74
2026-02-0637$57.67$2,133.79
2026-02-055,613$58.45$328,079.85
2026-02-0232$50.11$1,603.52
2026-01-30678$50.15$34,001.7
2026-01-0219,990$42.96$858,770.4
2025-12-3121,339$43.37$925,472.43
2025-12-231,410$43.22$60,940.2
2025-12-225,681$44.47$252,634.07
2025-12-1094$46.87$4,405.78
2025-12-034,128$52.63$217,256.64
2025-12-0276$52.33$3,977.08
2025-12-01974$52.02$50,667.48
2025-11-283,198$52.68$168,470.64
2025-11-2160$44.33$2,659.8
2025-11-06198$48.63$9,628.74
2025-11-041,017$40.73$41,422.41
2025-11-031,017$40.81$41,503.77

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare LGIH to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.