MD (MD)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics present a compelling dichotomy between operational efficiency and top-line contraction. A Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 alongside a Beneish M-Score of -2.86 signals robust financial strength and low earnings manipulation risk, suggesting the reported fundamentals are credible despite recent headwinds. The DuPont decomposition reveals that return on equity is being driven primarily by margin expansion rather than asset turnover or leverage; specifically, an 11.2% ROIC combined with a net margin of 8.6% indicates high-quality profitability relative to capital employed. However, this operational resilience contrasts sharply with revenue growth of -4.9%, implying the business may be defending market share through pricing power rather than expanding its customer base or volume.
Valuation metrics currently reflect significant pessimism regarding future earnings potential. With a forward P/E of 11.7x trading well below typical sector multiples, the market appears to have priced in a prolonged period of stagnation or decline that is inconsistent with the strong margin profile and high Piotroski score. The DCF model implies a fair value of $105, suggesting significant upside potential if execution improves; however, this valuation assumes a reversion toward mean growth rates rather than an extension of current negative trends. Investors must weigh whether the discount reflects temporary cyclical pressures or structural deterioration that could invalidate the margin-driven ROE narrative over time.
While specific risk factor deltas and insider activity data were not provided to fully assess the reward/risk profile, the divergence between strong quality scores and shrinking revenues warrants close monitoring of upcoming earnings calls for guidance on volume recovery. The absence of Fama-French alpha data limits a precise assessment of whether the stock's performance has been driven by market beta or specific security selection factors. Ultimately, the setup suggests a potential value opportunity contingent on the company successfully reversing its revenue trajectory while maintaining these elevated margins.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $129 | $94 | $73 |
| 3% | $152 | $105 | $79 |
| 4% | $186 | $120 | $88 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $105 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XHS or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell MD shares regardless of MD's individual fundamentals. We estimate $32M of passive capital is structurally linked to MD through 7 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on MD's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in MD to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If MD (MD) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES (BTSG) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with MD. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
MD Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest MD Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
MD Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does MD convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
MD converts 92% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-07 | 8 | $22.21 | $177.68 |
| 2026-05-06 | 694 | $20.83 | $14,456.02 |
| 2026-04-15 | 136 | $22.61 | $3,074.96 |
| 2026-04-14 | 11 | $21.81 | $239.91 |
| 2026-04-13 | 39 | $21.45 | $836.55 |
| 2026-04-02 | 72 | $20.70 | $1,490.4 |
| 2026-04-01 | 439 | $21.39 | $9,390.21 |
| 2026-03-31 | 116 | $20.80 | $2,412.8 |
| 2026-03-13 | 434 | $19.46 | $8,445.64 |
| 2026-03-04 | 9,093 | $19.74 | $179,495.82 |
| 2026-02-27 | 186 | $19.86 | $3,693.96 |
| 2026-02-26 | 3,576 | $19.90 | $71,162.4 |
| 2026-02-25 | 13,184 | $20.06 | $264,471.04 |
| 2026-02-24 | 1,840 | $19.74 | $36,321.6 |
| 2026-02-20 | 99 | $19.30 | $1,910.7 |
| 2026-02-13 | 278 | $21.07 | $5,857.46 |
| 2026-01-22 | 128 | $22.07 | $2,824.96 |
| 2026-01-05 | 2,295 | $21.29 | $48,860.55 |
| 2025-12-09 | 71 | $21.57 | $1,531.47 |
| 2025-12-01 | 513 | $24.09 | $12,358.17 |
| 2025-11-28 | 2,211 | $24.45 | $54,058.95 |
| 2025-11-03 | 47 | $16.97 | $797.59 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare MD to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.