MDLN (MDLN)

$34.1B
Market Cap
29.4
P/E Ratio
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Altman Z 2.2 Gray ZoneROIC−WACC -4.6%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 2.2.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency appears constrained, with a Return on Invested Capital of 4.5% indicating that the firm generates returns only marginally above typical risk-free benchmarks. This mediocre ROIC is reflected in an Equity Multiplier-driven DuPont decomposition where a 2.0x leverage ratio supports a modest 6.0% return on equity; however, this reliance on financial engineering masks underlying operational weakness, evidenced by thin net margins of just 4.1%. The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 further corroborates these fundamental concerns, suggesting the company lacks the momentum and quality characteristics associated with high-grade equities.

Valuation metrics present a significant disconnect between current market pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flow models. While the stock trades at a premium multiple of 29.4x relative to historical norms, this expansion appears unjustified given the lack of superior growth drivers or margin expansion potential. The DCF analysis implies a fair value of $16, suggesting that current market prices may be pricing in aggressive growth assumptions that are difficult to reconcile with the company's low profitability and moderate asset turnover ratios.

Risk parameters have deteriorated sharply over the recent quarter, highlighted by substantial insider activity where net selling exceeded $2.1 billion within ninety days. This pronounced offloading of equity by management or major shareholders acts as a potent negative signal regarding future prospects, compounding the concerns raised by weak fundamental scores and elevated valuations. The convergence of high valuation multiples, subpar capital efficiency, and aggressive insider distribution creates an asymmetric risk profile where downside potential may outweigh limited upside catalysts absent further positive developments in operational leverage or profitability trends.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →7.1%9.1%11.1%
2%$23$13$7
3%$31$16$9
4%$43$21$11

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.1%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $16 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
2.2
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

26.4%
Gross Margin
4.1%
Net Margin
4.5%
ROIC
9.1%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -4.6%— Negative spread.
1.3B
Free Cash Flow
40%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

4.1%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.74x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
2.00x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
6.0%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

1.00x
Debt / Equity
4.29x
Current Ratio
2.5x
Interest Coverage
3.4x
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.91%
FCF Yield
3.1B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$2.1B
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
2
Sale Transactions
2026-03-10CARLYLE GROUP, INC.Sold 2/2 qtrsSale$1.1B
2026-03-10HELLMAN & FRIEDMAN CAPITAL PARTNERS X PASale$1.1B
2026-03-05CARLYLE GROUP, INC.Sold 2/2 qtrsOther9M shares
2026-03-05HELLMAN & FRIEDMAN CAPITAL PARTNERS X PAOther15M shares
2026-03-05LAABS AMANDA H.Grant25,788 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.24
Act: $0.38
+59.9%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

25.3
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
3.18
Price/Book
6M
Avg Volume
$50.88
52W High
$34.89
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$734M
Tracked Passive Exposure
7
ETFs Holding MDLN
0.12%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$591B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XHE or VOE, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell MDLN shares regardless of MDLN's individual fundamentals. We estimate $734M of passive capital is structurally linked to MDLN through 7 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on MDLN's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in MDLN to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

MDLN Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
MDLNEpicenterVTVETFVOETFVXFETFLLYLow RiskJNJLow RiskABBVMed RiskUNHMed RiskMRKLow Risk
MDLN Price Drop (%)0

If MDLN (MDLN) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with MDLN. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

MDLN Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
MDLN

Float lock-up computed from 10 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

MDLN Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does MDLN convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$1.3B
EBITDA
$3.1B
FCF Conversion
42%
Reinvestment Rate
58%
42% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
4.5%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-4.6%

MDLN converts 42% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 58% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-4.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-14384$38.71$14,864.64
2026-05-08129,530$41.86$5.4M
2026-05-0717,788$42.01$747,273.88
2026-05-0642$45.32$1,903.44
2026-05-053,369$44.19$148,876.11
2026-05-04405$44.75$18,123.75
2026-05-018,226$44.47$365,810.22
2026-04-30537$43.40$23,305.8
2026-04-28129,547$45.23$5.9M
2026-04-27118,688$44.76$5.3M
2026-04-23119,114$47.16$5.6M
2026-04-2214,362$47.51$682,338.62
2026-04-21150,509$48.26$7.3M
2026-04-1489,830$47.22$4.2M
2026-04-1095,936$45.69$4.4M
2026-04-06126,054$44.28$5.6M
2026-04-022,924$44.00$128,656
2026-03-269,147$42.67$390,302.49
2026-03-23107,727$42.73$4.6M
2026-03-1238,579$42.39$1.6M
2026-03-10443$43.41$19,230.63
2026-03-09432,273$43.83$18.9M
2026-03-06806,472$44.05$35.5M
2026-03-04136,801$44.39$6.1M
2026-02-2719,492$48.89$952,963.88
2026-02-23200$49.80$9,960
2026-02-06200$46.20$9,240
2026-02-048,585$44.72$383,921.2
2026-01-305,231$43.73$228,751.63
2026-01-2183,577$44.15$3.7M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare MDLN to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.