MNKD (MNKD)

Market Cap
P/E Ratio
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Beneish M 0.80 Flag (> −2.22)

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9. Beneish M-Score of 0.80 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
0.80
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

74.8%
Gross Margin
1.7%
Net Margin
5.0%
ROIC
+22.2%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-78.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
13.7M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

-16.53x
Debt / Equity
1.70x
Current Ratio
1.0x
Interest Coverage
4.7x
Net Debt / EBITDA
51.5M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.06
Act: $0.04
-33.3%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.08
Act: $0.05
-34.8%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.03
Act: $0.07
+110.0%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.03
Act: $0.01
-66.7%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
Price/Book
Avg Volume
52W High
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$39M
Tracked Passive Exposure
2
ETFs Holding MNKD
0.15%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$26B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XBI or VHT, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell MNKD shares regardless of MNKD's individual fundamentals. We estimate $39M of passive capital is structurally linked to MNKD through 2 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on MNKD's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in MNKD to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

MNKD Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
MNKDEpicenterVHTETFXBIETFLLYLow RiskJNJLow RiskABBVMed RiskUNHMed RiskMRKLow Risk
MNKD Price Drop (%)0

If MNKD (MNKD) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with MNKD. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

MNKD Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
MNKD

ETFs with Highest MNKD Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 2 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

MNKD Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does MNKD convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$14M
EBITDA
$52M
FCF Conversion
27%
Reinvestment Rate
73%
27% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

MNKD converts 27% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 73% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-08174,032$3.55$617,813.6
2026-05-0114,741$2.83$41,717.03
2026-04-20138$2.84$391.92
2026-04-1735,119$2.75$96,577.25
2026-04-02317$2.54$805.18
2026-04-0190$2.45$220.5
2026-03-27710,000$2.30$1.6M
2026-03-246,165$2.44$15,042.6
2026-03-232,878$2.47$7,108.66
2026-03-192,137$2.61$5,577.57
2026-03-0938,580$2.61$100,693.8
2026-02-2725,419$3.24$82,357.56
2026-02-172,384$5.66$13,493.44
2026-02-0452$6.21$322.92
2026-02-0313,878$6.01$83,406.78
2026-01-081,162$5.85$6,797.7
2025-12-24533$5.93$3,160.69
2025-12-161,976$5.94$11,737.44
2025-12-11713$5.84$4,163.92
2025-11-246,650$5.03$33,449.5
2025-11-17150$5.06$759
2025-11-102,516$5.63$14,165.08

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare MNKD to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.