MRNA (MRNA)

Market Cap
P/E Ratio
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 3/9Beneish M -3.54 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of the company reveal severe distress, characterized by a negative ROIC-WACC spread and a DuPont-decomposed Return on Equity of -32.6%. This poor equity generation stems primarily from an unsustainable net margin contraction to -146.8%, which outweighs modest asset turnover efficiency at 0.16x; while the gross margin remains robust at 54.8%, it cannot offset collapsing operating leverage or pricing power, evidenced by a sharp 39.9% year-over-year revenue decline. The Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 further corroborates deteriorating financial health and operational weakness, suggesting the business model is currently failing to generate cash flow relative to its asset base.

Valuation metrics are absent from the provided dataset due to the company's negative earnings profile; consequently, traditional P/E comparisons or DCF fair value models based on implied growth rates cannot be constructed without inventing data not present in the source material. The market is currently pricing in a scenario where top-line execution has faltered significantly, as reflected by the steep revenue contraction that drives the aggressive negative margins. Without positive earnings to anchor valuation multiples, any current price level implicitly assumes a prolonged period of operational turnaround or restructuring rather than sustainable profitability growth.

Risk assessment indicators highlight elevated downside potential alongside mixed signals regarding management confidence and financial stability. The insider flow data indicates $8.5 million in net selling over the last 90 days, suggesting that internal stakeholders may be reducing exposure amid these headwinds. While the Beneish M-Score of -3.54 points to a low probability of earnings manipulation, this metric does not mitigate the fundamental reality of negative returns on invested capital and shrinking revenues. The convergence of negative ROIC, declining revenue, and insider selling creates a risk-reward profile where downside volatility is likely pronounced until margin expansion or asset efficiency improves materially.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

3/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics
-3.54
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

54.8%
Gross Margin
-146.8%
Net Margin
-21.1%
ROIC
-39.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+20.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-2.1B
Free Cash Flow

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

-146.8%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.16x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.43x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
-32.6%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

0.43x
Debt / Equity
3.29x
Current Ratio
-275.8x
Interest Coverage
-2.5B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$9M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
2
Sale Transactions
2026-03-05KLINGER SHANNON THYMESold 4/8 qtrsOther11,797 shares
2026-03-05MOCK JAMES MSold 3/8 qtrsOther11,797 shares
2026-03-02KLINGER SHANNON THYMESold 4/8 qtrsGrant$429,880
2026-03-02KLINGER SHANNON THYMESold 4/8 qtrsSale$726,047
2026-02-27MOCK JAMES MSold 3/8 qtrsOther11,004 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $-3.18
Act: $-2.52
+20.7%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $-2.97
Act: $-2.13
+28.3%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $-2.18
Act: $-0.51
+76.6%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $-2.60
Act: $-2.11
+18.9%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
Price/Book
Avg Volume
52W High
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$2.4B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding MRNA
0.04%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$5.9T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XBI or VBR, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell MRNA shares regardless of MRNA's individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.4B of passive capital is structurally linked to MRNA through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in MRNA to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

MRNA Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
MRNAEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFLLYLow RiskLLYLow RiskJNJLow RiskJNJLow RiskABBVMed Risk
MRNA Price Drop (%)0

If MRNA (MRNA) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies ELI LILLY + CO (LLY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with MRNA. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 22 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

MRNA Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
MRNA

Float lock-up computed from 22 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1261,913$52.88$3.3M
2026-05-112,500$54.35$135,875
2026-05-0810,389$48.54$504,282.06
2026-05-0710,498$48.79$512,197.42
2026-05-0637,323$46.71$1.7M
2026-05-05320$47.30$15,136
2026-05-01722$45.94$33,168.68
2026-04-228,845$54.23$479,664.35
2026-04-203,819$53.72$205,156.68
2026-04-172,827$54.68$154,580.36
2026-04-153$52.84$158.52
2026-04-13594,363$50.96$30.3M
2026-04-08360$50.11$18,039.6
2026-04-0681,303$49.20$4.0M
2026-04-014,191$50.80$212,902.8
2026-03-31931$48.23$44,902.13
2026-03-271,117$53.57$59,837.69
2026-03-2630$53.54$1,606.2
2026-03-2351,635$51.38$2.7M
2026-03-1916,623$52.40$871,045.2
2026-03-171,105$53.31$58,907.55
2026-03-164,125$52.56$216,810
2026-03-1340,539$53.39$2.2M
2026-03-126,523$55.97$365,092.31
2026-03-11152$54.98$8,356.96
2026-03-055,392$57.80$311,657.6
2026-03-039,660$52.85$510,531
2026-03-02200$53.57$10,714
2026-02-2421,941$50.29$1.1M
2026-02-231,104,252$49.87$55.1M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare MRNA to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.