NMIH (NMIH)

$2.8B
Market Cap
7.5
P/E Ratio
0.63
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Altman Z 2.7 Gray ZoneROIC−WACC +2.7%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 2.7.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency of NMIH demonstrates a tangible ROIC-WACC spread of +2.7%, indicating the firm generates returns that exceed its cost of capital, though this margin is relatively modest compared to high-quality growth equities. This operational performance sits within a complex DuPont framework where an exceptional 55% net margin drives profitability despite only moderate revenue expansion at 8.5% year-over-year; however, the lack of leverage data prevents a complete assessment of how much return stems from financial engineering versus core operations. Fundamental stability metrics present a mixed signal: while the Altman Z-Score of 2.7 suggests a reasonable buffer against bankruptcy, the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 points to average fundamental strength without significant recent improvement or deterioration in balance sheet quality.

Valuation analysis reveals a stark divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flow modeling. Trading at a forward P/E multiple of 7.5x, the stock appears significantly compressed relative to its implied growth trajectory if it were trading near the calculated DCF fair value of $126 per share. This wide gap implies that the market is currently pricing in substantial downside risk or expects earnings contraction that would invalidate the high margin assumptions underlying the valuation model, effectively discounting future cash flows far more aggressively than historical performance justifies.

Risk assessment highlights a critical tension between profitability and financial resilience; while the high net margins provide a cushion for earnings volatility, the moderate Piotroski score suggests limited momentum in improving fundamental quality factors such as operating efficiency or leverage reduction. Without additional data on insider activity or specific sector risk premiums, the investment case rests entirely on whether the market's deep discount to fair value adequately compensates for the uncertainty surrounding future margin sustainability and growth acceleration potential.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6.2%8.2%10.2%
2%$164$108$80
3%$211$126$89
4%$300$153$101

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=8.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $126 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
2.7
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

55.0%
Net Margin
10.9%
ROIC
8.2%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +2.7%— Positive spread.
+8.5%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+8.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
412.5M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.48x
Debt / Equity
18.6x
Interest Coverage
0.7x
Net Debt / EBITDA
12.94%
FCF Yield
539.5M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.12
Act: $1.28
+14.4%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.19
Act: $1.22
+2.5%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $1.21
Act: $1.21
+0.4%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.19
Act: $1.20
+0.8%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

6.7
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.09
Price/Book
474377
Avg Volume
$43.20
52W High
$31.90
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$70M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding NMIH
0.12%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$60B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like KBE or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NMIH shares regardless of NMIH's individual fundamentals. We estimate $70M of passive capital is structurally linked to NMIH through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on NMIH's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in NMIH to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

NMIH Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
NMIHEpicenterVTWOETFSPSMETFVFHETFSANMMed RiskVIAVHigh RiskSMTCUnknownBELow RiskAXHigh Risk
NMIH Price Drop (%)0

If NMIH (NMIH) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SANMINA CORP (SANM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with NMIH. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

NMIH Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
NMIH

Float lock-up computed from 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

NMIH Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does NMIH convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$413M
EBITDA
$540M
FCF Conversion
76%
Reinvestment Rate
24%
76% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
10.9%
ROIC − WACC Spread
2.7%

NMIH converts 76% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 2.7% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-134,776$37.39$178,574.64
2026-05-0722$38.25$841.5
2026-05-0576$36.96$2,808.96
2026-04-2220,075$39.78$798,583.5
2026-04-091$38.91$38.91
2026-03-17237$37.28$8,835.36
2026-03-0614$38.70$541.8
2026-03-022$39.31$78.62
2026-02-27676$39.77$26,884.52
2026-02-201,430$38.79$55,469.7
2026-01-231$38.69$38.69
2026-01-13545$39.31$21,423.95
2026-01-09581$40.48$23,518.88
2026-01-0573$40.61$2,964.53
2025-11-25152$37.62$5,718.24
2025-11-213$37.29$111.87
2025-11-20199$36.90$7,343.1

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare NMIH to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.