NMIH (NMIH)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 2.7.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of NMIH demonstrates a tangible ROIC-WACC spread of +2.7%, indicating the firm generates returns that exceed its cost of capital, though this margin is relatively modest compared to high-quality growth equities. This operational performance sits within a complex DuPont framework where an exceptional 55% net margin drives profitability despite only moderate revenue expansion at 8.5% year-over-year; however, the lack of leverage data prevents a complete assessment of how much return stems from financial engineering versus core operations. Fundamental stability metrics present a mixed signal: while the Altman Z-Score of 2.7 suggests a reasonable buffer against bankruptcy, the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 points to average fundamental strength without significant recent improvement or deterioration in balance sheet quality.
Valuation analysis reveals a stark divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flow modeling. Trading at a forward P/E multiple of 7.5x, the stock appears significantly compressed relative to its implied growth trajectory if it were trading near the calculated DCF fair value of $126 per share. This wide gap implies that the market is currently pricing in substantial downside risk or expects earnings contraction that would invalidate the high margin assumptions underlying the valuation model, effectively discounting future cash flows far more aggressively than historical performance justifies.
Risk assessment highlights a critical tension between profitability and financial resilience; while the high net margins provide a cushion for earnings volatility, the moderate Piotroski score suggests limited momentum in improving fundamental quality factors such as operating efficiency or leverage reduction. Without additional data on insider activity or specific sector risk premiums, the investment case rests entirely on whether the market's deep discount to fair value adequately compensates for the uncertainty surrounding future margin sustainability and growth acceleration potential.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6.2% | 8.2% | 10.2% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $164 | $108 | $80 |
| 3% | $211 | $126 | $89 |
| 4% | $300 | $153 | $101 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=8.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $126 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like KBE or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NMIH shares regardless of NMIH's individual fundamentals. We estimate $70M of passive capital is structurally linked to NMIH through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on NMIH's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in NMIH to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If NMIH (NMIH) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SANMINA CORP (SANM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with NMIH. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
NMIH Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest NMIH Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
NMIH Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does NMIH convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
NMIH converts 76% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 2.7% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 4,776 | $37.39 | $178,574.64 |
| 2026-05-07 | 22 | $38.25 | $841.5 |
| 2026-05-05 | 76 | $36.96 | $2,808.96 |
| 2026-04-22 | 20,075 | $39.78 | $798,583.5 |
| 2026-04-09 | 1 | $38.91 | $38.91 |
| 2026-03-17 | 237 | $37.28 | $8,835.36 |
| 2026-03-06 | 14 | $38.70 | $541.8 |
| 2026-03-02 | 2 | $39.31 | $78.62 |
| 2026-02-27 | 676 | $39.77 | $26,884.52 |
| 2026-02-20 | 1,430 | $38.79 | $55,469.7 |
| 2026-01-23 | 1 | $38.69 | $38.69 |
| 2026-01-13 | 545 | $39.31 | $21,423.95 |
| 2026-01-09 | 581 | $40.48 | $23,518.88 |
| 2026-01-05 | 73 | $40.61 | $2,964.53 |
| 2025-11-25 | 152 | $37.62 | $5,718.24 |
| 2025-11-21 | 3 | $37.29 | $111.87 |
| 2025-11-20 | 199 | $36.90 | $7,343.1 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare NMIH to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.