NRP (NRP)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 9.5.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company exhibits a robust fundamental profile characterized by an ROIC-WACC spread of 8.0%, indicating capital allocations that significantly outpace the cost of equity and debt financing. This efficiency is underpinned by exceptional profitability, evidenced by a net margin of 67.4% driving a DuPont-decomposed ROE of 21.6%. However, this high return stems primarily from pricing power rather than operational velocity or leverage; asset turnover sits at just 0.27x while the equity multiplier remains conservative at 1.18x. Financial stability appears strong with an Altman Z-Score of 9.5, suggesting a low probability of bankruptcy, yet the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals potential weakness in financial health trends or asset quality relative to its peers.
Valuation metrics present a dichotomy between current multiples and underlying growth dynamics. The stock trades at a P/E ratio of 12.3x, which requires contextualization against historical averages and sector benchmarks not provided here, but the multiple implies market skepticism regarding future earnings sustainability given the -17.4% revenue decline year-over-year. While the high margins support current profitability, the contraction in top-line growth suggests that the DCF fair value model would likely hinge on assumptions about margin expansion or a turnaround in volume rather than organic sales acceleration. The absence of insider trading activity over the last 90 days further indicates a neutral stance from management regarding near-term catalysts.
The risk-reward landscape is defined by this tension between superior capital efficiency and deteriorating revenue trends. While the Altman Z-Score mitigates immediate solvency concerns, the declining sales trajectory combined with a middling Piotroski score introduces uncertainty about whether current margins can be sustained without significant margin compression or increased leverage to boost asset turnover. Investors must weigh whether the 8% spread in capital returns is sufficient compensation for the revenue headwinds and the lack of clear insider conviction driving future performance.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VNQI or DEM, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NRP shares regardless of NRP's individual fundamentals. We estimate $97M of passive capital is structurally linked to NRP through 5 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on NRP's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 5 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in NRP to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If NRP (NRP) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (2330) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with NRP. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 5 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
NRP Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest NRP Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 5 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 5,739 | $107.13 | $614,819.07 |
| 2026-05-12 | 11 | $110.12 | $1,211.32 |
| 2026-03-25 | 1,750 | $125.40 | $219,450 |
| 2026-03-17 | 409 | $116.77 | $47,758.93 |
| 2026-03-12 | 104 | $119.33 | $12,410.32 |
| 2026-03-06 | 208 | $119.65 | $24,887.2 |
| 2026-03-02 | 2,387 | $121.05 | $288,946.35 |
| 2026-02-19 | 58 | $123.23 | $7,147.34 |
| 2026-02-04 | 456 | $118.27 | $53,931.12 |
| 2026-02-02 | 4 | $113.50 | $454 |
| 2026-01-28 | 1,268 | $113.97 | $144,513.96 |
| 2026-01-27 | 1,256 | $114.09 | $143,297.04 |
| 2026-01-21 | 101 | $119.02 | $12,021.02 |
| 2025-12-22 | 900 | $102.77 | $92,493 |
| 2025-12-16 | 280 | $102.87 | $28,803.6 |
| 2025-12-15 | 160 | $104.37 | $16,699.2 |
| 2025-11-12 | 1,448 | $105.04 | $152,097.92 |
| 2025-10-14 | 950 | $106.12 | $100,814 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare NRP to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.