NVTS (NVTS)

$25.86
+4.02%
$6.3B
Market Cap
P/E Ratio
3.62
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 1/9Beneish M -4.16 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 1/9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of NVTS exhibit severe distress, characterized by a negative ROIC of -15.8% that indicates capital destruction rather than value creation. This poor return profile is compounded by an alarming net margin contraction to -254.7%, suggesting operational inefficiencies or significant one-time charges are eroding profitability despite maintaining a gross margin of 31.0%. The DuPont decomposition implied here points squarely at drastic margin collapse and likely insufficient asset turnover, as leverage cannot offset such negative operating returns given the Piotroski F-Score of 1/9. This low score signals deteriorating fundamentals across multiple dimensions, while the Beneish M-Score of -4.16 stands out as a strong indicator that management earnings quality is likely high and financial statements are not subject to manipulation, distinguishing this decline from potential accounting fraud but confirming genuine operational weakness.

Valuation metrics for NVTS cannot be meaningfully anchored against historical multiples or sector averages due to the absence of positive earnings required for standard P/E comparisons; any existing valuation would rely entirely on non-GAAP measures or price-to-sales ratios that fail to reflect the underlying cash burn. The market appears to have priced in a scenario where revenue is contracting sharply, with year-over-year growth plummeting 44.9%, implying that current share prices may already reflect worst-case expectations regarding future scalability and path to profitability. Without positive earnings generation or a credible turnaround strategy visible in these metrics, traditional valuation frameworks offer little insight into intrinsic fair value, leaving the stock exposed to significant downside risk if operational improvements do not materialize quickly.

The convergence of negative ROIC, collapsing net margins, and severe revenue contraction creates a high-risk environment where the probability of further capital erosion remains elevated until fundamental inflection points are reached. While the low Beneish M-Score provides some comfort regarding earnings integrity, it does not mitigate the operational realities reflected in the financial statements. Investors must weigh whether the current market price adequately discounts the potential for continued value destruction or if there is a speculative premium attached to any rumored strategic pivot that could reverse these negative trends.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

1/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics
-4.16
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

31.0%
Gross Margin
-254.7%
Net Margin
-15.8%
ROIC
-44.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-38.2%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-44.4M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.13x
Debt / Equity
4.99x
Current Ratio
-67.3M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.06
Act: $-0.06
+2.9%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.05
Act: $-0.05
+0.4%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.05
Act: $-0.05
-0.5%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.05
Act: $-0.05
+3.9%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

-185.3
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
14.69
Price/Book
30M
Avg Volume
$33.82
52W High
$4.99
52W Low
72%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$121M
Tracked Passive Exposure
4
ETFs Holding NVTS
0.09%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$140B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XSD or VTWO, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NVTS shares regardless of NVTS's individual fundamentals. We estimate $121M of passive capital is structurally linked to NVTS through 4 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on NVTS's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 4 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in NVTS to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

NVTS Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
NVTSEpicenterVGTETFVTWOETFXSDETFNVDALow RiskAAPLLow RiskMSFTLow RiskMXLUnknownAVGOLow Risk
NVTS Price Drop (%)0

If NVTS (NVTS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with NVTS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 4 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

NVTS Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 26 NVTS shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
NVTS
Total Shares
237M
ETF Lock-Up
3.9%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
3.9%Locked Float

NVTS (NVTS) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.5% of the XSD (XSD) and 0.1% of the VTWO (VTWO). Across 4 tracked ETFs, approximately 9M shares (3.9% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.

Float lock-up computed from 4 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

NVTS Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
NVTS
PRICE
$25.86
FLOOR (POC)
$8.59
STRENGTH
High
$610%$722%$9POC 25%$1013%$11$13$14$16$17$19$20$22$23$24$26$25.86$27$29$30$32$33
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for NVTS over the past year sits near $8.59 (25% of 252-day volume). The current price of $25.86 trades 201.0% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (25% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-127,293$22.65$165,186.45
2026-05-1124,861$18.20$452,470.2
2026-05-07139,787$16.68$2.3M
2026-05-046,200$17.45$108,190
2026-04-292,163,086$15.12$32.7M
2026-04-281,069$18.30$19,562.7
2026-04-2710,300$17.28$177,984
2026-04-24306$18.51$5,664.06
2026-04-23286,333$18.47$5.3M
2026-04-2240,332$15.33$618,289.56
2026-04-2117,275$13.20$228,030
2026-04-17149,662$12.37$1.9M
2026-04-161,141$10.26$11,706.66
2026-04-152,274$9.87$22,444.38
2026-04-13700$9.54$6,678
2026-04-104,211$9.42$39,667.62
2026-04-025,124$8.54$43,758.96
2026-03-3120,182$7.83$158,025.06
2026-03-26141,468$9.48$1.3M
2026-03-253,243$9.28$30,095.04
2026-03-234,200$8.75$36,750
2026-03-20317,265$9.17$2.9M
2026-03-195,059$9.06$45,834.54
2026-03-1739,202$10.49$411,228.98
2026-03-1342,214$9.98$421,295.72
2026-03-11100,000$8.68$868,000
2026-03-09307,618$8.20$2.5M
2026-03-021,200$9.00$10,800
2026-02-27293,913$9.51$2.8M
2026-02-265,114$9.88$50,526.32

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare NVTS to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.