NXST (NXST)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 1.6.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of NXST reveal a company operating with thin operational leverage, characterized by a modest ROIC spread and an ROE driven primarily by financial leverage rather than margin expansion or asset efficiency. The DuPont decomposition highlights this structural reliance on the equity multiplier of 5.26x to achieve a 5.3% return on equity, while net margins compress at just 2.2%. Despite high gross margins near 54.8%, revenue contraction of -8.5% year-over-year suggests deteriorating top-line momentum, and the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 indicates average financial health without strong positive signals for value creation or balance sheet strengthening.
Valuation metrics present a significant divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic model estimates. Trading at a P/E multiple of 64.5x, the stock commands a premium that exceeds typical levels for firms exhibiting negative revenue growth and low absolute returns on invested capital. This elevated valuation implies the market is pricing in substantial future recovery or acceleration not yet reflected in the trailing twelve months data. However, discounted cash flow analysis suggests a fair value of $171, which must be contextualized against implied growth assumptions that appear aggressive given the current trajectory; without clarifying catalysts to justify such a multiple, the gap between price and model-derived value warrants scrutiny regarding forward-looking expectations versus historical performance.
Risk factors are amplified by recent insider activity, where net selling totaling $3.55 million over the last 90 days signals potential caution from those with superior information about future prospects. While the Beneish M-Score of -2.75 offers some reassurance against earnings manipulation risks, the combination of shrinking revenues, leverage-dependent returns, and significant insider outflow creates a precarious risk-reward profile. Investors must weigh whether current ownership exits reflect anticipated operational headwinds or broader portfolio rebalancing in light of the stock's expansive valuation relative to its deteriorating fundamentals.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 6.8% | 8.8% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $163 | $119 | $48 |
| 3% | $244 | $171 | $71 |
| 4% | $404 | $262 | $103 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=6.8%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $171 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like DVY or VOX, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NXST shares regardless of NXST's individual fundamentals. We estimate $525M of passive capital is structurally linked to NXST through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on NXST's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in NXST to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If NXST (NXST) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Facebook Inc. Class A (META) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with NXST. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 19 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
NXST Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest NXST Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 19 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
NXST Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does NXST convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
NXST converts 57% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 2,230 | $195.97 | $437,013.1 |
| 2026-05-11 | 3 | $202.79 | $608.37 |
| 2026-05-08 | 14 | $194.52 | $2,723.28 |
| 2026-05-07 | 13 | $197.21 | $2,563.73 |
| 2026-05-06 | 73 | $199.14 | $14,537.22 |
| 2026-05-05 | 59 | $199.19 | $11,752.21 |
| 2026-05-01 | 84 | $208.14 | $17,483.76 |
| 2026-04-30 | 167 | $202.93 | $33,889.31 |
| 2026-04-28 | 1,458 | $204.80 | $298,598.4 |
| 2026-04-24 | 111 | $204.82 | $22,735.02 |
| 2026-04-22 | 219 | $206.00 | $45,114 |
| 2026-04-20 | 112 | $200.78 | $22,487.36 |
| 2026-04-17 | 1 | $197.40 | $197.4 |
| 2026-04-06 | 187 | $180.38 | $33,731.06 |
| 2026-04-01 | 46,417 | $180.83 | $8.4M |
| 2026-03-31 | 52,277 | $185.18 | $9.7M |
| 2026-03-30 | 5 | $213.13 | $1,065.65 |
| 2026-03-26 | 289 | $218.10 | $63,030.9 |
| 2026-03-25 | 3,945 | $221.73 | $874,724.85 |
| 2026-03-20 | 846 | $223.05 | $188,700.3 |
| 2026-03-16 | 36 | $233.61 | $8,409.96 |
| 2026-03-12 | 62 | $245.22 | $15,203.64 |
| 2026-03-09 | 18 | $247.75 | $4,459.5 |
| 2026-03-04 | 226 | $243.55 | $55,042.3 |
| 2026-03-03 | 919 | $247.24 | $227,213.56 |
| 2026-03-02 | 79 | $251.02 | $19,830.58 |
| 2026-02-27 | 5,521 | $246.16 | $1.4M |
| 2026-02-26 | 10 | $232.54 | $2,325.4 |
| 2026-02-20 | 1,765 | $233.36 | $411,880.4 |
| 2026-02-19 | 2 | $238.07 | $476.14 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare NXST to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.