OTTR (OTTR)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 5/9.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of OTTR presents a mixed picture, characterized by an ROIC-WACC spread that requires careful calibration against implied cost of equity given the modest 8.1% return on invested capital. Despite this moderate reinvestment yield, earnings power is supported by robust profitability levers; specifically, a net margin expansion to 21.2% and strong gross margins at 43.2% drive an ROE of 14.8%, which decomposes into high margin quality rather than excessive leverage or asset turnover efficiency. The equity multiplier sits at 2.13x, indicating moderate financial gearing that contributes to returns without signaling distress, while the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 and Beneish M-Score of -2.69 suggest a stable fundamental profile with low indicators of potential earnings manipulation or aggressive accounting practices.
Valuation metrics currently reflect significant compression relative to historical norms and sector peers, trading at a P/E multiple of 13.5x which appears discounted given the company's margin expansion trajectory. Discounted cash flow analysis suggests an intrinsic fair value of $10 per share; however, this valuation assumes specific growth trajectories that must be reconciled with the observed revenue contraction of -2.0% year-over-year. The market price likely incorporates a risk premium for near-term top-line weakness while pricing in potential margin-led recovery, creating a divergence between current earnings multiples and long-term cash flow expectations if operational leverage can offset declining sales volume.
Insider activity over the last 90 days remains neutral with zero net flow, offering no distinct signal regarding management's immediate confidence or hedging behavior relative to the stock price. While the negative revenue growth introduces downside volatility risks that could compress future ROIC and widen the gap between current valuation multiples and DCF-derived fair value, the underlying margin structure provides a defensive buffer against further earnings deterioration. The investment case hinges on whether top-line stabilization can accelerate before multiple expansion occurs, balancing the attractive entry point implied by the $10 fair value estimate against the reality of shrinking revenue streams.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $15 | $8 | $4 |
| 3% | $20 | $10 | $5 |
| 4% | $26 | $13 | $7 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $10 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like SLYV or SPSM, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell OTTR shares regardless of OTTR's individual fundamentals. We estimate $168M of passive capital is structurally linked to OTTR through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on OTTR's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in OTTR to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If OTTR (OTTR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NextEra Energy Inc. (NEE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with OTTR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 9 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
OTTR Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest OTTR Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 9 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
OTTR Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does OTTR convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
OTTR converts 20% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 80% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 1,361 | $89.70 | $122,081.7 |
| 2026-05-11 | 1,629 | $88.03 | $143,400.87 |
| 2026-05-07 | 1,414 | $88.89 | $125,690.46 |
| 2026-05-06 | 104 | $88.74 | $9,228.96 |
| 2026-05-04 | 342 | $90.78 | $31,046.76 |
| 2026-04-30 | 9 | $88.16 | $793.44 |
| 2026-04-23 | 1,401 | $86.92 | $121,774.92 |
| 2026-04-20 | 1,599 | $88.16 | $140,967.84 |
| 2026-04-17 | 153 | $87.48 | $13,384.44 |
| 2026-04-14 | 636 | $91.88 | $58,435.68 |
| 2026-04-07 | 619 | $88.54 | $54,806.26 |
| 2026-04-02 | 165 | $88.22 | $14,556.3 |
| 2026-04-01 | 7,315 | $87.77 | $642,037.55 |
| 2026-03-30 | 1,164 | $85.85 | $99,929.4 |
| 2026-03-25 | 11 | $87.09 | $957.99 |
| 2026-03-24 | 368 | $86.00 | $31,648 |
| 2026-03-23 | 101 | $84.20 | $8,504.2 |
| 2026-03-20 | 269 | $87.50 | $23,537.5 |
| 2026-03-19 | 114 | $87.25 | $9,946.5 |
| 2026-03-13 | 9,839 | $85.31 | $839,365.09 |
| 2026-03-11 | 666 | $86.36 | $57,515.76 |
| 2026-03-03 | 10 | $85.70 | $857 |
| 2026-02-12 | 8 | $85.93 | $687.44 |
| 2026-01-14 | 161 | $85.24 | $13,723.64 |
| 2026-01-12 | 8 | $85.61 | $684.88 |
| 2025-12-31 | 60 | $82.55 | $4,953 |
| 2025-12-30 | 210 | $82.64 | $17,354.4 |
| 2025-12-29 | 46 | $82.44 | $3,792.24 |
| 2025-12-26 | 5 | $82.65 | $413.25 |
| 2025-12-23 | 3 | $82.71 | $248.13 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare OTTR to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.