PCRX (PCRX)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 1.9.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of PCRX present a stark divergence between operational profitability and capital efficiency. While the company boasts an impressive gross margin of 79.4%, indicating strong pricing power or product differentiation, this advantage is significantly eroded by thin net margins at just 1.0%. This structural weakness directly impacts capital allocation; with a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of only 2.2% against a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 6.9%, the firm generates negative value for shareholders, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -4.7%. Despite this inefficient use of capital and low revenue growth of 3.6% year-over-year, qualitative integrity metrics remain robust, with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggesting strong financial health and a Beneish M-Score of -2.94 indicating minimal earnings manipulation risk, though the Altman Z-Score of 1.9 flags potential distress in long-term solvency relative to industry peers.
Valuation metrics currently reflect extreme market optimism that appears disconnected from underlying cash flow generation. Trading at a P/E ratio of 144.1x, the stock commands a premium far exceeding what its current profitability or growth trajectory justifies, implying the market is pricing in aggressive future expansion rather than existing fundamentals. This disconnect is highlighted by the DCF fair value estimate of $92, which suggests significant downside potential if earnings fail to accelerate substantially; at this valuation multiple, even modest misses on revenue guidance could trigger a sharp re-rating as investors recalibrate expectations regarding growth sustainability versus capital destruction.
The risk/reward profile exhibits high asymmetry driven by conflicting signals between operational leverage and solvency thresholds. While the low Beneish M-Score mitigates concerns over accounting fraud, the Altman Z-Score of 1.9 introduces a notable credit risk delta that warrants scrutiny regarding liquidity buffers during economic downturns. The combination of negative ROIC-WACC spread and elevated valuation multiples creates a scenario where capital appreciation relies entirely on multiple expansion or dramatic margin improvement rather than organic earnings compounding, leaving little room for error in execution.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 6.9% | 8.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $93 | $75 | $51 |
| 3% | $121 | $92 | $59 |
| 4% | $178 | $121 | $69 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=6.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $92 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XPH or VFVA, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell PCRX shares regardless of PCRX's individual fundamentals. We estimate $23M of passive capital is structurally linked to PCRX through 7 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on PCRX's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in PCRX to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If PCRX (PCRX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INC (CORT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with PCRX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
PCRX Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest PCRX Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
PCRX Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does PCRX convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
PCRX converts 112% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-4.7%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 5,297 | $22.84 | $120,983.48 |
| 2026-04-23 | 291 | $24.88 | $7,240.08 |
| 2026-03-26 | 3 | $23.49 | $70.47 |
| 2026-03-25 | 3 | $23.20 | $69.6 |
| 2026-03-23 | 19 | $22.11 | $420.09 |
| 2026-03-20 | 4 | $22.57 | $90.28 |
| 2026-03-19 | 7 | $22.02 | $154.14 |
| 2026-03-17 | 908 | $22.69 | $20,602.52 |
| 2026-03-16 | 4 | $23.26 | $93.04 |
| 2026-03-13 | 14,482 | $23.53 | $340,761.46 |
| 2026-03-12 | 1 | $22.83 | $22.83 |
| 2026-03-11 | 174 | $22.44 | $3,904.56 |
| 2026-03-03 | 530 | $21.28 | $11,278.4 |
| 2026-03-02 | 27 | $21.91 | $591.57 |
| 2026-02-24 | 1,809 | $23.11 | $41,805.99 |
| 2026-02-23 | 514 | $23.22 | $11,935.08 |
| 2026-02-20 | 118 | $23.18 | $2,735.24 |
| 2026-02-13 | 247 | $21.45 | $5,298.15 |
| 2026-02-05 | 207 | $20.68 | $4,280.76 |
| 2026-01-30 | 681 | $20.09 | $13,681.29 |
| 2026-01-29 | 1,029 | $20.38 | $20,971.02 |
| 2026-01-26 | 57 | $20.67 | $1,178.19 |
| 2026-01-02 | 8 | $25.88 | $207.04 |
| 2025-12-29 | 1 | $26.51 | $26.51 |
| 2025-12-26 | 1 | $26.02 | $26.02 |
| 2025-12-24 | 10 | $25.74 | $257.4 |
| 2025-12-22 | 100 | $26.35 | $2,635 |
| 2025-12-19 | 10 | $25.88 | $258.8 |
| 2025-12-18 | 5 | $26.55 | $132.75 |
| 2025-12-17 | 79 | $26.18 | $2,068.22 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare PCRX to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.