ETF · Broad Market

XPH(XPH)

$68.58
+1.90%
Expense Ratio
$308M
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
96.1%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards Other and Healthcare, with 56.8% and 43.1%, respectively. The dominance of these sectors is a notable aspect of this fund's composition. From a geographic perspective, there isn't enough information to make any conclusions about the portfolio's international exposure.

Concentration risk is relatively low due to the lack of single-stock dominance, with no holding exceeding 3.6% of the total AUM. The weighted P/E and P/B ratios suggest that this portfolio has a relatively normal valuation posture compared to other equities in the market. However, its sector mix diverges from the broader market's allocation, which may make it more sensitive to macroeconomic shifts affecting these sectors.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 10:03:38.555205+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 78/100

The investment theme implied by the ticker XPH is pharmaceuticals, a sector focused on drug discovery and manufacturing. The fund's top holdings demonstrate a strong alignment with this mandate, as nearly all positions are within the healthcare industry, specifically targeting biotechnology and specialty pharma companies like OGN, CORT, and AXSM. However, several significant constituents lack specific sub-sector classifications in the provided data, which introduces ambiguity regarding their precise operational focus relative to pure-play pharmaceuticals. While the majority of named holdings fit the narrative, the presence of unclassified assets suggests a potential dilution of thematic purity if these entities operate outside the core drug development lifecycle or rely heavily on broader medical services rather than specific pharmacological innovations.

Sector coherence is evident with healthcare comprising over 41% of the portfolio and representing nearly all top-tier positions, indicating a concentrated strategy within its stated domain. The relatively low concentration in the top ten holdings at roughly 26.4% suggests the fund avoids excessive reliance on any single mega-cap stock to stabilize returns, instead distributing risk across a diversified basket of smaller, specialized entities. This structure differentiates the vehicle from broad market indices by focusing exclusively on niche therapeutic areas rather than large pharmaceutical conglomerates that dominate general health care sectors. The data reflects a genuine attempt to maintain thematic integrity through sector-specific selection while managing idiosyncratic risks associated with individual biotech firms.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 16:19:12.559313+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The XPH ETF exhibits a pronounced sector bias toward Healthcare, which constitutes over 41% of the portfolio across twenty-four distinct holdings. This heavy weighting suggests an investment thesis centered on exposure to biotechnology and pharmaceutical innovation rather than broad market diversification or traditional industrial sectors. The concentration within this single industry indicates that the fund's performance will be highly correlated with macroeconomic trends specific to life sciences, such as regulatory approvals, drug pricing negotiations, and clinical trial outcomes, thereby amplifying volatility associated with those specific events compared to a more balanced allocation.

Within the top five holdings, four of the positions are explicitly categorized under Healthcare, reinforcing the fund's deep specialization in this vertical while leaving the remaining exposure unassigned or diversified into other categories not detailed here. The presence of companies like OGN and LQDA alongside pure-play biotech firms such as CORT and AXSM implies a strategy that may target both large-cap established players and smaller, high-growth clinical stage entities. This mix introduces idiosyncratic risk tied to the success or failure of specific drug candidates, as these assets often lack stable revenue streams until regulatory milestones are achieved.

The top-10 concentration metric stands at 26.1%, indicating that a significant portion of the fund's total value is dependent on its largest ten positions. While this level of concentration allows for strong upside potential if key holdings outperform, it simultaneously magnifies downside risk should any single major holding underperform or face adverse news events. The lack of substantial weight in non-healthcare sectors further limits the portfolio's ability to hedge against industry-specific downturns, creating a profile that is neither broadly market-replicating nor defensively diversified across economic cycles.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 10:43:07.339602+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share XPH's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of XPH's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
VHTVHT$19B5690.0%
VFMOVFMO$1B2743.3%
SPTMSPTM$12B2639.9%
VTWOVTWO$15B1325.7%
SPSMSPSM$14B1725.4%

90% of XPH's portfolio by weight is also held by VHT, which commands 61× more assets under management. When VHT receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging XPH's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofXPH's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

18.8x
Weighted P/E
5.60x
Weighted P/B
$38B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 40% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000175
Well Diversified
Top 5: 14.5%Top 10: 24.3%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Other56.4%Healthcare43.6%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
96% Weight
Market Cap
Mid
Risk Profile
Moderate

Caution: 40% of fund weight scores below 4 — indicating weak profitability or deteriorating fundamentals.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
40%
0–3 Weak
47%
4–6 Average
10%
7–9 Strong

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
60%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
0.44%
TTM Yield
Safe
Dividend Durability
60% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside XPH collectively pay out 60% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is a sustainable payout level with moderate room for dividend growth. Based on 12% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+63.8%
ETF 1Y Return
-22.4%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+86.2%
Multiple Expansion
P/E Inflation

XPH is up 63.8% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is -22.4%. The remaining +86.2% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 85% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of XPH's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

62% Creators
38% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)15.7%
Value Destroyers9.8%

Of XPH's analyzed weight, 62% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 38% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 26% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

LOW

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

14/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership4.2%
Most Crowded HoldingZTS (16.8%)
Least CrowdedATAI (0.5%)
Coverage52% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

XPH has a low Passive Crowding Score of 14/100. On average, 4.2% of the market capitalization of XPH's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates relatively low passive crowding — the underlying stocks have ample active-market liquidity to absorb ETF-driven flows without significant price distortion.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 4 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration24.3%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1CRNX
CRINETICS PHARMACEUTICALS IN
Healthcare
3.74%
2DFTX
DEFINIUM THERAPEUTICS INC
Healthcare
2.90%
3ATAI
ATAIBECKLEY INC
Healthcare
2.89%
3/9
4MBX
MBX BIOSCIENCES INC
2.88%
5ELVN
ENLIVEN THERAPEUTICS INC
Healthcare
2.10%
6ALMS
ALUMIS INC
Healthcare
2.07%
7TRVI
TREVI THERAPEUTICS INC
1.98%
8AMLX
AMYLYX PHARMACEUTICALS INC
Healthcare
1.93%
9HROW
HARROW INC
1.91%
10NUVB
NUVATION BIO INC
1.88%
11LGND
LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS
1.83%
32.5x5/9
12NKTR
NEKTAR THERAPEUTICS
1.80%
13AMRX
AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS INC
Healthcare
1.80%
57.7x7/9
14EWTX
EDGEWISE THERAPEUTICS INC
1.77%
15LQDA
LIQUIDIA CORP
1.76%
444.1x
The bottom 50 stocks in XPH account for only 66.7% of the total fund weight.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how XPH’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-07-19

15 holdings · 33.3% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CRNX3.74%208,454
2DFTX2.90%307,837
3ATAI2.89%1,892,630
4MBX2.88%230,853
5ELVN2.10%193,355
6ALMS2.07%356,637
7TRVI1.98%533,891
8AMLX1.93%531,511
9HROW1.91%199,280
10NUVB1.88%1,562,040
11LGND1.83%28,820
12NKTR1.80%125,997
13AMRX1.80%466,980
14EWTX1.77%217,319
15LQDA1.76%109,642

2026-07-18

15 holdings · 33.3% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CRNX3.74%208,454
2DFTX2.90%307,837
3ATAI2.89%1,892,630
4MBX2.88%230,853
5ELVN2.10%193,355
6ALMS2.07%356,637
7TRVI1.98%533,891
8AMLX1.93%531,511
9HROW1.91%199,280
10NUVB1.88%1,562,040
11LGND1.83%28,820
12NKTR1.80%125,997
13AMRX1.80%466,980
14EWTX1.77%217,319
15LQDA1.76%109,642

2026-07-17

15 holdings · 33.3% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CRNX3.71%206,953
2DFTX2.98%305,621
3MBX2.97%229,191
4ELVN2.18%191,963
5ALMS2.18%354,069
6ATAI2.15%1,879,003
7TRVI2.05%530,047
8MANE2.02%76,389
9AMLX2.00%527,684
10NUVB1.95%1,550,793
11EWTX1.88%215,754
12NKTR1.82%125,090
13HROW1.81%197,845
14MAZE1.81%288,794
15LGND1.81%28,612

2026-07-16

15 holdings · 33.2% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CRNX3.74%206,953
2DFTX3.04%305,621
3MBX2.80%229,191
4ATAI2.30%1,879,003
5ELVN2.15%191,963
6ALMS2.09%354,069
7AMLX2.07%527,684
8TRVI2.05%530,047
9NUVB1.98%1,550,793
10MAZE1.86%288,794
11LGND1.86%28,612
12EWTX1.85%215,754
13MANE1.82%76,389
14NKTR1.82%125,090
15LQDA1.80%108,853

2026-07-15

15 holdings · 32.8% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CRNX3.75%206,819
2MBX2.98%229,042
3DFTX2.89%305,423
4ALMS2.15%353,840
5ELVN2.11%191,839
6ATAI2.02%1,877,785
7AMLX1.99%527,342
8NUVB1.94%1,549,787
9EWTX1.93%215,614
10LGND1.91%28,593
11TRVI1.89%529,703
12NKTR1.85%125,009
13MAZE1.82%288,607
14MANE1.82%76,339
15HROW1.79%197,717

2026-07-14

15 holdings · 32.8% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CRNX3.61%203,794
2DFTX3.00%300,955
3MBX2.92%225,686
4ALMS2.09%348,666
5ELVN2.05%189,033
6EWTX2.05%212,453
7ATAI2.03%1,850,311
8TRVI1.97%521,949
9AMLX1.96%519,628
10MANE1.91%75,215
11LGND1.89%28,170
12NUVB1.88%1,527,109
13MAZE1.84%284,388
14NKTR1.84%123,179
15LQDA1.77%107,188

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

20.8%
Annual Volatility
2.08
Sharpe (1Y)
0.76
Sharpe (3Y)
-23.6%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-31.6%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove XPH Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+1.90%(2026-07-17)

Top Contributors

+0.227%
+0.109%
+0.028%

Top Detractors

-0.002%
-0.005%
-0.007%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.44%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How XPH’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-07-1994 snapshots
Other56.4%
Healthcare43.6%
Change since 2026-03-30
Other
-1.8%
Healthcare
+1.8%
2026-03-302026-07-19

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.