PEN (PEN)

$12.9B
Market Cap
72.6
P/E Ratio
0.84
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 21.4 SafeBeneish M -2.52 CleanROIC−WACC 0.0%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 21.4 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The company demonstrates robust fundamental quality characterized by a high-margin business model, evidenced by gross margins of 67.1% and net margins expanding to 12.7%, supported by revenue growth of 17.5%. While the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and an exceptionally strong Altman Z-Score of 21.4 signal low distress risk and financial stability, the capital allocation efficiency presents a critical constraint; with ROIC matching WACC exactly at 9.9%, the spread is zero, indicating that current returns merely cover the cost of capital without generating excess value through leverage or superior operational turnover as seen in DuPont decomposition. This structural characteristic suggests the firm's valuation must rely heavily on future growth assumptions rather than a wide economic moat derived from current asset efficiency.

Valuation metrics reflect significant market optimism relative to historical norms and sector peers, with a current P/E of 72.6x implying that investors are pricing in substantial multiple expansion or accelerated earnings acceleration beyond the reported 17.5% growth rate. The disparity between this premium valuation and a DCF-derived fair value of $159 suggests the market is currently assigning an implied growth trajectory that may not be fully supported by the zero ROIC-WACC spread, creating potential downside risk if future returns fail to exceed the cost of capital or if margin compression occurs despite strong top-line performance.

The Beneish M-Score of -2.52 further reinforces the integrity of reported earnings against manipulation concerns, aligning with the high Altman score to present a low-risk profile regarding accounting quality and solvency. However, the combination of zero economic spread and an elevated multiple creates a narrow risk/reward asymmetry where downside protection is limited by valuation levels while upside depends entirely on sustaining or accelerating growth rates that justify the current premium pricing.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →7.9%9.9%11.9%
2%$195$142$111
3%$230$159$120
4%$281$182$133

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $159 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
21.4
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.52
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

67.1%
Gross Margin
12.7%
Net Margin
9.9%
ROIC
9.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: 0.0%— Negative spread.
+17.5%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+1168.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
174.9M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.28x
Debt / Equity
6.64x
Current Ratio
157.5x
Interest Coverage
0.1x
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.36%
FCF Yield
223.9M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.67
Act: $0.83
+24.5%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.82
Act: $0.86
+4.7%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.92
Act: $0.97
+5.3%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.11
Act: $1.18
+6.1%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

51.4
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
9.02
Price/Book
1M
Avg Volume
$362.41
52W High
$221.26
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$781M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding PEN
0.17%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$461B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XHE or MDYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell PEN shares regardless of PEN's individual fundamentals. We estimate $781M of passive capital is structurally linked to PEN through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on PEN's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in PEN to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

PEN Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
PENEpicenterVBETFVXFETFVONGETFFLEXMed RiskSTAAUnknownFTILow RiskGMEDLow RiskNVCRUnknown
PEN Price Drop (%)0

If PEN (PEN) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies FLEX LTD (FLEX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with PEN. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 14 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

PEN Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
PEN

Float lock-up computed from 15 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

PEN Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does PEN convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$175M
EBITDA
$224M
FCF Conversion
78%
Reinvestment Rate
22%
78% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
9.9%
ROIC − WACC Spread
0.0%

PEN converts 78% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (0.0%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-14223$322.59$71,937.57
2026-05-11284$322.23$91,513.32
2026-05-083,911$324.65$1.3M
2026-05-071,070$324.19$346,883.3
2026-05-064,395$323.86$1.4M
2026-05-0511,753$324.65$3.8M
2026-05-042,415$325.33$785,671.95
2026-05-012,225$326.48$726,418
2026-04-302,227$324.82$723,374.14
2026-04-2913,488$325.99$4.4M
2026-04-284,564$327.98$1.5M
2026-04-2341,603$332.21$13.8M
2026-04-2247,643$327.00$15.6M
2026-04-213,352$329.71$1.1M
2026-04-205,835$332.13$1.9M
2026-04-14521$331.48$172,701.08
2026-04-0921$331.08$6,952.68
2026-04-081,156$329.96$381,433.76
2026-04-0721$329.87$6,927.27
2026-04-06235$330.36$77,634.6
2026-04-02417$328.96$137,176.32
2026-04-0140$328.37$13,134.8
2026-03-312$328.20$656.4
2026-03-30139$335.10$46,578.9
2026-03-2742,531$336.42$14.3M
2026-03-2459,922$335.56$20.1M
2026-03-172,256$336.21$758,489.76
2026-03-1317,899$334.99$6.0M
2026-03-121,226$336.11$412,070.86
2026-03-06268$340.62$91,286.16

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare PEN to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.