PEN (PEN)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 21.4 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company demonstrates robust fundamental quality characterized by a high-margin business model, evidenced by gross margins of 67.1% and net margins expanding to 12.7%, supported by revenue growth of 17.5%. While the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and an exceptionally strong Altman Z-Score of 21.4 signal low distress risk and financial stability, the capital allocation efficiency presents a critical constraint; with ROIC matching WACC exactly at 9.9%, the spread is zero, indicating that current returns merely cover the cost of capital without generating excess value through leverage or superior operational turnover as seen in DuPont decomposition. This structural characteristic suggests the firm's valuation must rely heavily on future growth assumptions rather than a wide economic moat derived from current asset efficiency.
Valuation metrics reflect significant market optimism relative to historical norms and sector peers, with a current P/E of 72.6x implying that investors are pricing in substantial multiple expansion or accelerated earnings acceleration beyond the reported 17.5% growth rate. The disparity between this premium valuation and a DCF-derived fair value of $159 suggests the market is currently assigning an implied growth trajectory that may not be fully supported by the zero ROIC-WACC spread, creating potential downside risk if future returns fail to exceed the cost of capital or if margin compression occurs despite strong top-line performance.
The Beneish M-Score of -2.52 further reinforces the integrity of reported earnings against manipulation concerns, aligning with the high Altman score to present a low-risk profile regarding accounting quality and solvency. However, the combination of zero economic spread and an elevated multiple creates a narrow risk/reward asymmetry where downside protection is limited by valuation levels while upside depends entirely on sustaining or accelerating growth rates that justify the current premium pricing.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 7.9% | 9.9% | 11.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $195 | $142 | $111 |
| 3% | $230 | $159 | $120 |
| 4% | $281 | $182 | $133 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $159 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XHE or MDYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell PEN shares regardless of PEN's individual fundamentals. We estimate $781M of passive capital is structurally linked to PEN through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on PEN's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in PEN to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If PEN (PEN) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies FLEX LTD (FLEX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with PEN. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 14 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
PEN Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest PEN Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 15 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
PEN Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does PEN convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
PEN converts 78% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (0.0%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 223 | $322.59 | $71,937.57 |
| 2026-05-11 | 284 | $322.23 | $91,513.32 |
| 2026-05-08 | 3,911 | $324.65 | $1.3M |
| 2026-05-07 | 1,070 | $324.19 | $346,883.3 |
| 2026-05-06 | 4,395 | $323.86 | $1.4M |
| 2026-05-05 | 11,753 | $324.65 | $3.8M |
| 2026-05-04 | 2,415 | $325.33 | $785,671.95 |
| 2026-05-01 | 2,225 | $326.48 | $726,418 |
| 2026-04-30 | 2,227 | $324.82 | $723,374.14 |
| 2026-04-29 | 13,488 | $325.99 | $4.4M |
| 2026-04-28 | 4,564 | $327.98 | $1.5M |
| 2026-04-23 | 41,603 | $332.21 | $13.8M |
| 2026-04-22 | 47,643 | $327.00 | $15.6M |
| 2026-04-21 | 3,352 | $329.71 | $1.1M |
| 2026-04-20 | 5,835 | $332.13 | $1.9M |
| 2026-04-14 | 521 | $331.48 | $172,701.08 |
| 2026-04-09 | 21 | $331.08 | $6,952.68 |
| 2026-04-08 | 1,156 | $329.96 | $381,433.76 |
| 2026-04-07 | 21 | $329.87 | $6,927.27 |
| 2026-04-06 | 235 | $330.36 | $77,634.6 |
| 2026-04-02 | 417 | $328.96 | $137,176.32 |
| 2026-04-01 | 40 | $328.37 | $13,134.8 |
| 2026-03-31 | 2 | $328.20 | $656.4 |
| 2026-03-30 | 139 | $335.10 | $46,578.9 |
| 2026-03-27 | 42,531 | $336.42 | $14.3M |
| 2026-03-24 | 59,922 | $335.56 | $20.1M |
| 2026-03-17 | 2,256 | $336.21 | $758,489.76 |
| 2026-03-13 | 17,899 | $334.99 | $6.0M |
| 2026-03-12 | 1,226 | $336.11 | $412,070.86 |
| 2026-03-06 | 268 | $340.62 | $91,286.16 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare PEN to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.