Technology

Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)

$152.17
-5.28%
$375.3B
Market Cap
175.9
P/E Ratio
1.52
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 8/9Altman Z 131.5 SafeBeneish M -1.88 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC -0.6%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

PLTR trades at 175.9x earnings — a 170% premium to its sector average of 65.0x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 131.5 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). DCF fair value of $18 implies 87% downside based on model assumptions. Beneish M-Score of -1.88 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The company exhibits a stark divergence between its top-line momentum and capital efficiency fundamentals. While revenue expansion of 56.2% drives an exceptional DuPont ROE decomposition via a 36.3% net margin, the negative ROIC-WACC spread of -1.0% indicates that current returns fail to cover the cost of capital, suggesting value destruction despite high accounting profitability supported by robust leverage and asset turnover metrics. Financial integrity appears sound with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and an Altman Z-Score of 158.9, yet the Beneish M-Score of -1.88 signals potential earnings manipulation risks that contradict the narrative generated by such aggressive growth rates.

Valuation metrics reflect extreme market pricing relative to intrinsic models, with a forward P/E of 239.5x vastly exceeding historical norms and sector peers. A DCF analysis anchors fair value at $17, implying an -88.4% discount from current levels if the assumed 49.7% ten-year free cash flow growth materializes; however, this assumption appears optimistic given the weak profitability factor (RMW) of -2.148 and negative spread on capital deployment. The market is currently pricing in a growth trajectory that may not align with the underlying economics where returns remain below the hurdle rate.

Risk profiles present conflicting signals regarding future performance sustainability. Although Fama-French alpha stands at an unusually high 72.74% annually, indicating significant outperformance relative to style factors, this momentum is counterbalanced by a value factor (HML) of only 0.010 and substantial insider selling totaling $439 million over the last 90 days. The combination of negative capital spread, weak profitability adjustments in factor models, and heavy executive offloading suggests that while short-term alpha persists, long-term risk-adjusted returns may face headwinds if growth decelerates or margins compress further.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$152.17
Fair Value
$18
Implied Upside
-88.4%
$18IMPLIED FAIR VALUEOVERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)26%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)15.0%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
47.2%annual FCF growth priced in at $152.17

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 56% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →13%15%17%
2%$20$17$14
3%$21$18$15
4%$23$19$16

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $152.17.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=15.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $18 (-86.7%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

175.9x
PLTR P/E
65.0x
Sector Avg
79.5x
5Y Avg P/E
+170%
vs Sector

Currently trading 156% above its 5-year average P/E of 79.5x.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

8/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
131.5
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-1.88
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

82.4%
Gross Margin
36.3%
Net Margin
14.5%
ROIC
15.0%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -0.6%— Negative spread.
+56.2%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+251.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
2.1B
Free Cash Flow

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

36.3%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.50x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.19x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
21.7%
Return on Equity
✅ ROE driven primarily by strong profit margins — a sign of pricing power.

Balance Sheet Health

0.19x
Debt / Equity
7.11x
Current Ratio
-0.9x
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.69%
FCF Yield
1.4B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$439M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
13
Sale Transactions
2026-03-16MOORE ALEXANDER DSold 6/6 qtrsSale$2M
2026-03-02THIEL PETER A. J.D.Sold 1/6 qtrsSale$290M
2026-02-26STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMANSold 6/6 qtrsOther7,000 shares
2026-02-24BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSINGSold 4/6 qtrsSale$520,601
2026-02-20SANKAR SHYAMSold 6/6 qtrsOther168,004 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.13
Act: $0.13
+1.1%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.14
Act: $0.16
+15.6%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.17
Act: $0.21
+25.5%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.23
Act: $0.25
+8.6%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

65.4%
Annual Volatility
0.86
Sharpe (1Y)
1.67
Sharpe (3Y)
-40.6%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-79.1%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

1.81
Market β
Mkt-RF
-0.445
Size (SMB)
Large-cap tilt
+0.010
Value (HML)
Neutral
-2.148
Profit (RMW)
Weak
-1.049
Invest (CMA)
Aggressive
Alpha (annual): +72.74%
R²: 37.3%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

75.5
Forward P/E
1.90
PEG Ratio
44.41
Price/Book
47M
Avg Volume
$207.52
52W High
$118.93
52W Low
38%
52W Range Position

10-K Risk Factor Expansion

Word count of Item 1A (Risk Factors) across annual filings. Rising counts often signal new regulatory, competitive, or operational risks.

+0.7%
YoY Change (20242025)
45,419
Latest Word Count
+9%
6-Year Total
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$47.5B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding PLTR
0.70%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.7T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like IGV or ARKF, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell PLTR shares regardless of Palantir Technologies Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $47.5B of passive capital is structurally linked to PLTR through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Palantir Technologies Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

PLTR Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
PLTREpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFTSLALow RiskAMDLow RiskTERLow RiskRKLB UQUnknownSHOPLow Risk
PLTR Price Drop (%)0

If Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TESLA INC (TSLA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with PLTR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 33 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

PLTR Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 PLTR shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
PLTR
Total Shares
2.3B
ETF Lock-Up
14.5%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
14.5%Locked Float

Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 8.0% of the IGV (IGV) and 4.5% of the ARKF (ARKF). Across 33 tracked ETFs, approximately 333M shares (14.5% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 33 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

PLTR Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
PLTR
PRICE
$152.17
FLOOR (POC)
$134.44
STRENGTH
Medium
$121$126$130$134POC 11%$1399%$1437%$1486%$1528%$152.17$15710%$161$165$170$174$1798%$1838%$188$192$196$201$205
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for Palantir Technologies Inc. over the past year sits near $134.44 (11% of 252-day volume). The current price of $152.17 trades 13.2% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

PLTR Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Palantir Technologies Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$2.1B
EBITDA
$1.4B
FCF Conversion
146%
Reinvestment Rate
-46%
146% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
14.5%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-0.6%

Palantir Technologies Inc. converts 146% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-0.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-131,538$136.00$209,168
2026-05-111,779$137.80$245,146.2
2026-05-047,456$144.07$1.1M
2026-05-0136$139.11$5,007.96
2026-04-3013,816$137.97$1.9M
2026-04-2813,350$143.10$1.9M
2026-04-276,846$143.09$979,594.14
2026-04-21141$145.89$20,570.49
2026-04-201,335,835$146.39$195.6M
2026-04-17123$142.76$17,559.48
2026-04-164,686$142.15$666,114.9
2026-04-15121$135.70$16,419.7
2026-04-14220$132.37$29,121.4
2026-04-13143$128.06$18,312.58
2026-04-10101$130.49$13,179.49
2026-04-083$150.07$450.21
2026-04-0612,118$148.46$1.8M
2026-03-311$137.55$137.55
2026-03-2481$160.84$13,028.04
2026-03-236,946$150.68$1.0M
2026-03-201,252$155.68$194,911.36
2026-03-1842,681$155.08$6.6M
2026-03-1750,175$152.72$7.7M
2026-03-16100$150.95$15,095
2026-03-1368,803$153.50$10.6M
2026-03-1235,277$151.60$5.3M
2026-03-0947,206$157.16$7.4M
2026-03-0621,820$152.67$3.3M
2026-03-057,323$153.19$1.1M
2026-03-0321,205$145.17$3.1M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

SEC Comment Letters

SEC correspondence with the company regarding their filings. Comment letters often flag disclosure deficiencies, accounting concerns, or material omissions.

Source: SEC EDGAR correspondence. Comment letters are public records of SEC staff review of company filings.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
HOOD0.5250.598Moderate
APP0.4930.582Moderate
COIN0.4890.554Moderate
SOFI0.4860.549Moderate
DASH0.4800.481Moderate
AXON0.4750.488Moderate
RKLB0.4720.567Moderate
BWXT0.4520.510Moderate
CRWD0.4460.506Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare PLTR to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.