Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicPLTR trades at 175.9x earnings — a 170% premium to its sector average of 65.0x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 131.5 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). DCF fair value of $18 implies 87% downside based on model assumptions. Beneish M-Score of -1.88 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company exhibits a stark divergence between its top-line momentum and capital efficiency fundamentals. While revenue expansion of 56.2% drives an exceptional DuPont ROE decomposition via a 36.3% net margin, the negative ROIC-WACC spread of -1.0% indicates that current returns fail to cover the cost of capital, suggesting value destruction despite high accounting profitability supported by robust leverage and asset turnover metrics. Financial integrity appears sound with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and an Altman Z-Score of 158.9, yet the Beneish M-Score of -1.88 signals potential earnings manipulation risks that contradict the narrative generated by such aggressive growth rates.
Valuation metrics reflect extreme market pricing relative to intrinsic models, with a forward P/E of 239.5x vastly exceeding historical norms and sector peers. A DCF analysis anchors fair value at $17, implying an -88.4% discount from current levels if the assumed 49.7% ten-year free cash flow growth materializes; however, this assumption appears optimistic given the weak profitability factor (RMW) of -2.148 and negative spread on capital deployment. The market is currently pricing in a growth trajectory that may not align with the underlying economics where returns remain below the hurdle rate.
Risk profiles present conflicting signals regarding future performance sustainability. Although Fama-French alpha stands at an unusually high 72.74% annually, indicating significant outperformance relative to style factors, this momentum is counterbalanced by a value factor (HML) of only 0.010 and substantial insider selling totaling $439 million over the last 90 days. The combination of negative capital spread, weak profitability adjustments in factor models, and heavy executive offloading suggests that while short-term alpha persists, long-term risk-adjusted returns may face headwinds if growth decelerates or margins compress further.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 56% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 13% | 15% | 17% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $20 | $17 | $14 |
| 3% | $21 | $18 | $15 |
| 4% | $23 | $19 | $16 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $152.17.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=15.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $18 (-86.7%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 156% above its 5-year average P/E of 79.5x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
10-K Risk Factor Expansion
Word count of Item 1A (Risk Factors) across annual filings. Rising counts often signal new regulatory, competitive, or operational risks.
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like IGV or ARKF, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell PLTR shares regardless of Palantir Technologies Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $47.5B of passive capital is structurally linked to PLTR through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Palantir Technologies Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TESLA INC (TSLA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with PLTR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 33 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
PLTR Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 PLTR shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 8.0% of the IGV (IGV) and 4.5% of the ARKF (ARKF). Across 33 tracked ETFs, approximately 333M shares (14.5% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest PLTR Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 33 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
PLTR Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Palantir Technologies Inc. over the past year sits near $134.44 (11% of 252-day volume). The current price of $152.17 trades 13.2% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
PLTR Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Palantir Technologies Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Palantir Technologies Inc. converts 146% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-0.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 1,538 | $136.00 | $209,168 |
| 2026-05-11 | 1,779 | $137.80 | $245,146.2 |
| 2026-05-04 | 7,456 | $144.07 | $1.1M |
| 2026-05-01 | 36 | $139.11 | $5,007.96 |
| 2026-04-30 | 13,816 | $137.97 | $1.9M |
| 2026-04-28 | 13,350 | $143.10 | $1.9M |
| 2026-04-27 | 6,846 | $143.09 | $979,594.14 |
| 2026-04-21 | 141 | $145.89 | $20,570.49 |
| 2026-04-20 | 1,335,835 | $146.39 | $195.6M |
| 2026-04-17 | 123 | $142.76 | $17,559.48 |
| 2026-04-16 | 4,686 | $142.15 | $666,114.9 |
| 2026-04-15 | 121 | $135.70 | $16,419.7 |
| 2026-04-14 | 220 | $132.37 | $29,121.4 |
| 2026-04-13 | 143 | $128.06 | $18,312.58 |
| 2026-04-10 | 101 | $130.49 | $13,179.49 |
| 2026-04-08 | 3 | $150.07 | $450.21 |
| 2026-04-06 | 12,118 | $148.46 | $1.8M |
| 2026-03-31 | 1 | $137.55 | $137.55 |
| 2026-03-24 | 81 | $160.84 | $13,028.04 |
| 2026-03-23 | 6,946 | $150.68 | $1.0M |
| 2026-03-20 | 1,252 | $155.68 | $194,911.36 |
| 2026-03-18 | 42,681 | $155.08 | $6.6M |
| 2026-03-17 | 50,175 | $152.72 | $7.7M |
| 2026-03-16 | 100 | $150.95 | $15,095 |
| 2026-03-13 | 68,803 | $153.50 | $10.6M |
| 2026-03-12 | 35,277 | $151.60 | $5.3M |
| 2026-03-09 | 47,206 | $157.16 | $7.4M |
| 2026-03-06 | 21,820 | $152.67 | $3.3M |
| 2026-03-05 | 7,323 | $153.19 | $1.1M |
| 2026-03-03 | 21,205 | $145.17 | $3.1M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
SEC Comment Letters
SEC correspondence with the company regarding their filings. Comment letters often flag disclosure deficiencies, accounting concerns, or material omissions.
Source: SEC EDGAR correspondence. Comment letters are public records of SEC staff review of company filings.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| HOOD | 0.525 | 0.598 | Moderate |
| APP | 0.493 | 0.582 | Moderate |
| COIN | 0.489 | 0.554 | Moderate |
| SOFI | 0.486 | 0.549 | Moderate |
| DASH | 0.480 | 0.481 | Moderate |
| AXON | 0.475 | 0.488 | Moderate |
| RKLB | 0.472 | 0.567 | Moderate |
| BWXT | 0.452 | 0.510 | Moderate |
| CRWD | 0.446 | 0.506 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare PLTR to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.