PNTG (PNTG)

$1.2B
Market Cap
41.7
P/E Ratio
1.28
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Beneish M -2.09 Flag (> −2.22)

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9. Beneish M-Score of -2.09 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency appears constrained, as indicated by a 5.0% ROIC that fails to generate excess returns over the cost of equity, suggesting limited organic value creation potential. Despite this compression in return on invested capital, earnings quality metrics present a mixed signal: while the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 reflects moderate financial strength without significant deterioration, the Beneish M-Score of -2.09 points to low probability of manipulation, lending credibility to the reported fundamentals. This dichotomy is further illuminated by DuPont decomposition logic; although revenue growth surged 36.3% year-over-year, net margins remain thin at 3.1%, implying that top-line expansion has yet to translate into proportional bottom-line leverage or operating efficiency gains.

Valuation multiples currently reflect aggressive market pricing for future growth rather than current earnings power. A P/E ratio of 41.7x significantly exceeds typical historical norms and sector averages, indicating the market is heavily discounting expectations of sustained high-growth execution. This premium valuation is starkly contrasted by a DCF-derived fair value estimate of $27, which implies that current prices may be detached from intrinsic worth under conservative growth assumptions. The discrepancy suggests investors are pricing in an acceleration of margin expansion or capital efficiency improvements that have not yet materialized in the balance sheet.

The risk-reward profile hinges on whether management can convert this revenue velocity into durable profitability while navigating a high-cost environment. The combination of low margins and suboptimal ROIC creates vulnerability if growth rates decelerate, as the high multiple offers little buffer against earnings misses. Conversely, the clean Beneish score provides some assurance that reported figures are reliable inputs for scenario analysis. Ultimately, the investment case rests entirely on the ability to bridge the gap between current valuation expectations and fundamental economic reality within a short timeframe.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$34$24$18
3%$40$27$19
4%$50$31$22

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $27 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
-2.09
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

13.8%
Gross Margin
3.1%
Net Margin
5.0%
ROIC
+36.3%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+31.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
36.3M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

1.59x
Debt / Equity
1.14x
Current Ratio
7.8x
Interest Coverage
2.5x
Net Debt / EBITDA
60.8M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.24
Act: $0.27
+13.7%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.27
Act: $0.27
0.0%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.29
Act: $0.30
+4.6%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.32
Act: $0.34
+7.7%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

22.6
Forward P/E
1.90
PEG Ratio
3.76
Price/Book
262927
Avg Volume
$37.54
52W High
$21.73
52W Low
52W Range Position

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in PNTG to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

PNTG Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
PNTGEpicenterVHTETFXHSETFLLYLow RiskJNJLow RiskABBVMed RiskUNHMed RiskMRKLow Risk
PNTG Price Drop (%)0

If PNTG (PNTG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with PNTG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

PNTG Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
PNTG

ETFs with Highest PNTG Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 2 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

PNTG Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does PNTG convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$36M
EBITDA
$61M
FCF Conversion
60%
Reinvestment Rate
40%
60% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

PNTG converts 60% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-06764$31.46$24,035.44
2026-04-271,041$30.01$31,240.41
2026-04-236$29.37$176.22
2026-04-09500$31.01$15,505
2026-03-27134$30.56$4,095.04
2026-03-12184$34.03$6,261.52
2026-02-273,743$30.49$114,124.07
2026-01-15100$28.82$2,882
2025-12-249$29.36$264.24
2025-11-2516$26.80$428.8

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare PNTG to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.