PRIM (PRIM)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 4.3.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of PRIM presents a neutral-to-negative profile, characterized by an ROIC-WACC spread of -0.1%, indicating that the company is currently generating returns marginally below its cost of equity. While the DuPont decomposition suggests revenue growth of 19.0% is driving top-line expansion within thin net margins of 3.6%, this operational leverage does not yet translate into value creation relative to capital costs. Qualitative financial health indicators remain mixed; a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 signals moderate fundamental strength, whereas the Altman Z-Score of 4.3 places the firm in the safe zone regarding bankruptcy risk. Conversely, the Beneish M-Score of -2.60 suggests low probability of earnings manipulation, providing some assurance on reported figures despite the narrow spread between return and cost of capital.
Valuation metrics suggest a significant premium relative to intrinsic value models. The current P/E ratio stands at 27.7x, which appears elevated when contrasted against an implied DCF fair value of $155; without specific historical or sector comparative multiples provided in the data set, this disparity highlights that the market price may be pricing in aggressive future growth assumptions not yet reflected in fundamentals. The disconnect between the high revenue growth rate and the sub-par ROIC-WACC spread implies that investors are betting on margin expansion or asset base optimization to close the efficiency gap before realizing returns above the cost of capital.
No risk factor deltas, insider activity data, or Fama-French alpha metrics were provided in the input parameters; therefore, a synthesis regarding specific risk premiums or style factor exposures cannot be constructed from the available information. The investment case rests entirely on whether management can successfully pivot the high-growth revenue trajectory into improved capital efficiency to justify the current multiple and bridge the negative spread between ROIC and WACC over time.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 10.9% | 12.9% | 14.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $180 | $144 | $119 |
| 3% | $199 | $155 | $127 |
| 4% | $222 | $169 | $135 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=12.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $155 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like IJT or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell PRIM shares regardless of PRIM's individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.2B of passive capital is structurally linked to PRIM through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in PRIM to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If PRIM (PRIM) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SANMINA CORP (SANM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with PRIM. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 11 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
PRIM Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest PRIM Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 9 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
PRIM Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does PRIM convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
PRIM converts 67% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-0.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 546 | $112.94 | $61,665.24 |
| 2026-05-13 | 546 | $113.30 | $61,861.8 |
| 2026-05-07 | 268,859 | $101.23 | $27.2M |
| 2026-05-01 | 51,642 | $181.15 | $9.4M |
| 2026-04-30 | 2 | $166.07 | $332.14 |
| 2026-04-23 | 135 | $171.63 | $23,170.05 |
| 2026-04-17 | 14,954 | $157.86 | $2.4M |
| 2026-04-16 | 2,775 | $162.52 | $450,993 |
| 2026-04-08 | 10,000 | $148.95 | $1.5M |
| 2026-04-02 | 232 | $150.67 | $34,955.44 |
| 2026-03-31 | 2,250 | $134.40 | $302,400 |
| 2026-03-23 | 15 | $138.82 | $2,082.3 |
| 2026-03-20 | 725 | $143.08 | $103,733 |
| 2026-03-11 | 1 | $134.11 | $134.11 |
| 2026-03-10 | 137 | $137.74 | $18,870.38 |
| 2026-02-27 | 4,152 | $151.99 | $631,062.48 |
| 2026-02-19 | 39 | $160.41 | $6,255.99 |
| 2026-02-04 | 9,105 | $155.03 | $1.4M |
| 2026-01-21 | 22,767 | $146.96 | $3.3M |
| 2025-12-31 | 957 | $124.33 | $118,983.81 |
| 2025-12-29 | 20 | $129.16 | $2,583.2 |
| 2025-12-16 | 251 | $130.55 | $32,768.05 |
| 2025-12-10 | 66 | $131.96 | $8,709.36 |
| 2025-11-19 | 96 | $118.41 | $11,367.36 |
| 2025-11-05 | 1,421 | $128.02 | $181,916.42 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare PRIM to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.