RNG (RNG)

$3.2B
Market Cap
78.6
P/E Ratio
1.15
Beta
0.81%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 8/9Altman Z 0.9 DistressBeneish M -4.37 CleanROIC−WACC +24.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9) with Altman Z of 0.9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The company demonstrates robust capital allocation efficiency, evidenced by a substantial ROIC-WACC spread of 24.4%, indicating strong value creation relative to the cost of capital. This high return is primarily driven by exceptional gross margin compression at 71.2% rather than leverage or asset turnover, as reflected in the low net margin of 1.7%. Fundamental stability appears robust with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and a significantly negative Beneish M-Score of -4.37, suggesting minimal earnings manipulation risk; however, the Altman Z-Score of 0.9 signals elevated distress territory that warrants caution despite the strong profitability metrics.

Valuation presents a significant divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value models. Trading at a P/E multiple of 78.6x, which is markedly elevated against historical norms and likely exceeds sector averages given the modest revenue growth trajectory of just 4.8% YoY, the stock appears to be priced for aggressive future expansion that has not yet been realized. A DCF analysis suggests a fair value of $196; if current trading levels approach or exceed this threshold based on implied forward multiples, the security may offer limited upside potential absent a material acceleration in earnings growth that justifies such premium pricing.

The risk-reward profile is bifurcated by conflicting signals regarding solvency and manipulation defenses. While the low Beneish score provides confidence in reported earnings quality, the sub-1.0 Altman Z-Score introduces a distinct probability of financial distress that could impair cash flows or trigger credit downgrades. Investors must weigh whether the high gross margins can sustain operations through potential liquidity constraints indicated by the weak solvency metric before committing capital at these elevated valuations.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8.6%10.6%12.6%
2%$237$176$138
3%$275$196$150
4%$328$221$164

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.6%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $196 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

8/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
0.9
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-4.37
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

71.2%
Gross Margin
1.7%
Net Margin
35.0%
ROIC
10.6%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +24.4%— Positive value creation spread.
+4.8%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+174.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
530.2M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

-3.52x
Debt / Equity
0.63x
Current Ratio
1.9x
Interest Coverage
1.5x
Net Debt / EBITDA
14.49%
FCF Yield
339.1M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.96
Act: $1.00
+4.2%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.02
Act: $1.06
+3.6%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $1.07
Act: $1.13
+5.2%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.13
Act: $1.18
+4.1%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

6.8
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
-5.35
Price/Book
3M
Avg Volume
$42.42
52W High
$21.91
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$157M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding RNG
0.06%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$265B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XSW or VFVA, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell RNG shares regardless of RNG's individual fundamentals. We estimate $157M of passive capital is structurally linked to RNG through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on RNG's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in RNG to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

RNG Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
RNGEpicenterVGTETFVBRETFVONGETFSMTCUnknownSANMMed RiskVIAVHigh RiskMARAUnknownYOULow Risk
RNG Price Drop (%)0

If RNG (RNG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SEMTECH CORP (SMTC) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with RNG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 10 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

RNG Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
RNG

Float lock-up computed from 10 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

RNG Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does RNG convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$530M
EBITDA
$339M
FCF Conversion
156%
Reinvestment Rate
-56%
156% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
35.0%
ROIC − WACC Spread
24.4%

RNG converts 156% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 24.4% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-04-2393$41.50$3,859.5
2026-04-2236,650$41.34$1.5M
2026-04-2040,051$40.39$1.6M
2026-04-1739,805$40.33$1.6M
2026-03-314,699$36.22$170,197.78
2026-03-1919,138$37.07$709,445.66
2026-03-172$37.38$74.76
2026-03-1678,356$37.78$3.0M
2026-03-131,295$38.06$49,287.7
2026-03-111$40.69$40.69
2026-03-1051$41.84$2,133.84
2026-03-097,987$42.02$335,613.74
2026-03-064$39.67$158.68
2026-03-0376,096$36.14$2.8M
2026-03-02274$36.45$9,987.3
2026-02-231,575$39.50$62,212.5
2026-02-1711,591$30.19$349,932.29
2026-02-122,906$28.11$81,687.66
2026-01-3017,899$25.56$457,498.44
2026-01-20150$26.30$3,945
2026-01-12100$29.88$2,988
2025-12-222,900$29.62$85,898
2025-12-15180$31.07$5,592.6
2025-12-0120$28.24$564.8
2025-11-054,908$27.47$134,822.76
2025-11-03940$30.12$28,312.8

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare RNG to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.