RNG (RNG)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9) with Altman Z of 0.9.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company demonstrates robust capital allocation efficiency, evidenced by a substantial ROIC-WACC spread of 24.4%, indicating strong value creation relative to the cost of capital. This high return is primarily driven by exceptional gross margin compression at 71.2% rather than leverage or asset turnover, as reflected in the low net margin of 1.7%. Fundamental stability appears robust with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and a significantly negative Beneish M-Score of -4.37, suggesting minimal earnings manipulation risk; however, the Altman Z-Score of 0.9 signals elevated distress territory that warrants caution despite the strong profitability metrics.
Valuation presents a significant divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value models. Trading at a P/E multiple of 78.6x, which is markedly elevated against historical norms and likely exceeds sector averages given the modest revenue growth trajectory of just 4.8% YoY, the stock appears to be priced for aggressive future expansion that has not yet been realized. A DCF analysis suggests a fair value of $196; if current trading levels approach or exceed this threshold based on implied forward multiples, the security may offer limited upside potential absent a material acceleration in earnings growth that justifies such premium pricing.
The risk-reward profile is bifurcated by conflicting signals regarding solvency and manipulation defenses. While the low Beneish score provides confidence in reported earnings quality, the sub-1.0 Altman Z-Score introduces a distinct probability of financial distress that could impair cash flows or trigger credit downgrades. Investors must weigh whether the high gross margins can sustain operations through potential liquidity constraints indicated by the weak solvency metric before committing capital at these elevated valuations.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8.6% | 10.6% | 12.6% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $237 | $176 | $138 |
| 3% | $275 | $196 | $150 |
| 4% | $328 | $221 | $164 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.6%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $196 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XSW or VFVA, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell RNG shares regardless of RNG's individual fundamentals. We estimate $157M of passive capital is structurally linked to RNG through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on RNG's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in RNG to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If RNG (RNG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SEMTECH CORP (SMTC) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with RNG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 10 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
RNG Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest RNG Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 10 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
RNG Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does RNG convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
RNG converts 156% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 24.4% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-23 | 93 | $41.50 | $3,859.5 |
| 2026-04-22 | 36,650 | $41.34 | $1.5M |
| 2026-04-20 | 40,051 | $40.39 | $1.6M |
| 2026-04-17 | 39,805 | $40.33 | $1.6M |
| 2026-03-31 | 4,699 | $36.22 | $170,197.78 |
| 2026-03-19 | 19,138 | $37.07 | $709,445.66 |
| 2026-03-17 | 2 | $37.38 | $74.76 |
| 2026-03-16 | 78,356 | $37.78 | $3.0M |
| 2026-03-13 | 1,295 | $38.06 | $49,287.7 |
| 2026-03-11 | 1 | $40.69 | $40.69 |
| 2026-03-10 | 51 | $41.84 | $2,133.84 |
| 2026-03-09 | 7,987 | $42.02 | $335,613.74 |
| 2026-03-06 | 4 | $39.67 | $158.68 |
| 2026-03-03 | 76,096 | $36.14 | $2.8M |
| 2026-03-02 | 274 | $36.45 | $9,987.3 |
| 2026-02-23 | 1,575 | $39.50 | $62,212.5 |
| 2026-02-17 | 11,591 | $30.19 | $349,932.29 |
| 2026-02-12 | 2,906 | $28.11 | $81,687.66 |
| 2026-01-30 | 17,899 | $25.56 | $457,498.44 |
| 2026-01-20 | 150 | $26.30 | $3,945 |
| 2026-01-12 | 100 | $29.88 | $2,988 |
| 2025-12-22 | 2,900 | $29.62 | $85,898 |
| 2025-12-15 | 180 | $31.07 | $5,592.6 |
| 2025-12-01 | 20 | $28.24 | $564.8 |
| 2025-11-05 | 4,908 | $27.47 | $134,822.76 |
| 2025-11-03 | 940 | $30.12 | $28,312.8 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare RNG to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.