RSI (RSI)

Market Cap
P/E Ratio
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Beneish M -3.07 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$60$45$36
3%$70$50$38
4%$84$56$42

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $50 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
-3.07
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

34.6%
Gross Margin
2.9%
Net Margin
15.4%
ROIC
+22.8%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+1294.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
131.6M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

1.17x
Debt / Equity
1.93x
Current Ratio
-2.6x
Net Debt / EBITDA
127.4M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.06
Act: $0.09
+47.7%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.06
Act: $0.11
+74.5%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.07
Act: $0.09
+24.5%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.11
Act: $0.08
-24.8%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
Price/Book
Avg Volume
52W High
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$51M
Tracked Passive Exposure
6
ETFs Holding RSI
0.08%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$63B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like VCR or VBK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell RSI shares regardless of RSI's individual fundamentals. We estimate $51M of passive capital is structurally linked to RSI through 6 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on RSI's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in RSI to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

RSI Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
RSIEpicenterVBKETFVTWOETFVCRETFAMZNLow RiskTSLALow RiskHDLow RiskTJXLow RiskBELow Risk
RSI Price Drop (%)0

If RSI (RSI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with RSI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

RSI Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
RSI

Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

RSI Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does RSI convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$132M
EBITDA
$127M
FCF Conversion
103%
Reinvestment Rate
-3%
103% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

RSI converts 103% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1313,041$27.51$358,757.91
2026-05-114,034$27.74$111,903.16
2026-05-0877,287$27.90$2.2M
2026-05-0777,816$27.86$2.2M
2026-04-201,000$22.89$22,890
2026-04-167,500$22.80$171,000
2026-04-08485$22.06$10,699.1
2026-03-2612$21.92$263.04
2026-03-2420$21.75$435
2026-03-23765$20.70$15,835.5
2026-03-199$20.47$184.23
2026-03-164$20.25$81
2026-03-05252$20.38$5,135.76
2026-03-03359$19.95$7,162.05
2026-03-02532$19.75$10,507
2026-02-1912$18.18$218.16
2026-02-18189$16.94$3,201.66
2026-01-262,260$17.17$38,804.2
2026-01-20310$19.30$5,983
2026-01-163,000$19.73$59,190
2026-01-07147$19.44$2,857.68
2025-12-221,200$19.50$23,400
2025-11-2433$17.50$577.5
2025-11-14573$17.35$9,941.55
2025-11-061,522$16.62$25,295.64

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare RSI to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.