RYAN (RYAN)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 5/9.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of RYAN present a stark dichotomy between aggressive top-line expansion and thin capital efficiency. While revenue growth accelerates at 21.3% year-over-year, indicating strong demand or market share gains, the return on invested capital sits at just 3.9%, suggesting that this growth is not yet generating excess cash flows relative to the cost of equity. This low ROIC is compounded by a net margin compression to 2.1%, implying that scale benefits have not yet translated into pricing power or operational leverage; consequently, DuPont analysis would likely point to high asset turnover driving returns rather than superior profitability or financial engineering. Despite these efficiency constraints, the balance sheet appears stable with a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9, signaling moderate financial health without triggering immediate distress signals typical of deteriorating firms.
Valuation metrics reflect significant market optimism that may be disconnected from current capital allocation quality. The stock trades at a premium P/E multiple of 75.8x, which is notably elevated compared to historical norms and likely exceeds sector averages given the modest margin profile; such pricing implicitly assumes sustained high-growth trajectories and future margin expansion not yet realized in earnings per share. A discounted cash flow analysis suggests an intrinsic fair value of $118, creating a wide valuation gap where current market prices must justify either superior long-term growth assumptions or significant upcoming structural improvements to align with this target. The disparity between the low ROIC and the high multiple indicates that investors are pricing in substantial future upside rather than rewarding present-day capital efficiency.
Risk assessment relies heavily on monitoring whether the 21.3% revenue growth can convert into higher margins, as the current profitability structure leaves little room for error should growth decelerate. The moderate Piotroski score suggests the company is not in distress but lacks the robust fundamental improvements often associated with high-quality compounders. Without evidence of improving ROIC or margin expansion, the elevated valuation carries heightened sensitivity to any miss in future execution, making the risk/reward profile dependent entirely on the realization of implied growth rates embedded within the current multiple.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $150 | $103 | $76 |
| 3% | $180 | $118 | $84 |
| 4% | $225 | $138 | $95 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $118 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like KIE or MDYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell RYAN shares regardless of RYAN's individual fundamentals. We estimate $134M of passive capital is structurally linked to RYAN through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on RYAN's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in RYAN to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If RYAN (RYAN) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies FLEX LTD (FLEX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with RYAN. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 11 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
RYAN Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest RYAN Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
RYAN Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does RYAN convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
RYAN converts 72% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 154,161 | $30.27 | $4.7M |
| 2026-05-13 | 5,262 | $31.51 | $165,805.62 |
| 2026-05-12 | 86,886 | $31.29 | $2.7M |
| 2026-05-11 | 1,403 | $31.31 | $43,927.93 |
| 2026-05-08 | 68,911 | $31.71 | $2.2M |
| 2026-05-07 | 173,370 | $29.39 | $5.1M |
| 2026-05-06 | 6,587 | $30.55 | $201,232.85 |
| 2026-05-04 | 8,239 | $30.83 | $254,008.37 |
| 2026-05-01 | 48,299 | $34.77 | $1.7M |
| 2026-04-30 | 22,142 | $35.26 | $780,726.92 |
| 2026-04-29 | 2 | $34.74 | $69.48 |
| 2026-04-24 | 3,094 | $35.40 | $109,527.6 |
| 2026-04-21 | 26 | $37.89 | $985.14 |
| 2026-04-09 | 63 | $34.91 | $2,199.33 |
| 2026-04-07 | 5,882 | $34.16 | $200,929.12 |
| 2026-04-06 | 26,760 | $33.51 | $896,727.6 |
| 2026-04-02 | 8,979 | $33.03 | $296,576.37 |
| 2026-04-01 | 206 | $33.74 | $6,950.44 |
| 2026-03-24 | 7,636 | $34.59 | $264,129.24 |
| 2026-03-23 | 3 | $34.68 | $104.04 |
| 2026-03-19 | 233 | $35.02 | $8,159.66 |
| 2026-03-18 | 15,800 | $35.98 | $568,484 |
| 2026-03-17 | 56,289 | $36.16 | $2.0M |
| 2026-03-10 | 27,895 | $37.84 | $1.1M |
| 2026-03-03 | 9,976 | $40.21 | $401,134.96 |
| 2026-02-27 | 16 | $39.24 | $627.84 |
| 2026-02-25 | 512 | $38.86 | $19,896.32 |
| 2026-02-24 | 43 | $39.02 | $1,677.86 |
| 2026-02-20 | 360 | $41.33 | $14,878.8 |
| 2026-02-17 | 17,724 | $38.71 | $686,096.04 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare RYAN to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.