SIG (SIG)

$3.4B
Market Cap
11.7
P/E Ratio
1.22
Beta
1.67%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 3.1 SafeBeneish M -2.55 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 3.1 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency reveals a distinct divergence between return on invested capital and equity returns, suggesting that high leverage is the primary driver of shareholder yield rather than organic operational prowess. While the ROIC-WACC spread sits at 10%, indicating robust underlying asset productivity relative to the cost of capital, the DuPont decomposition exposes this strength as heavily reliant on an Equity Multiplier of 3.09x; the low net margin of 4.3% and modest asset turnover of 1.17x constrain pure earnings power per dollar of sales. This structural reliance on debt is corroborated by a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, signaling strong fundamental stability absent major deterioration, yet paired with an Altman Z-Score of 3.1 that places the firm in the "grey zone" between safety and distress. Furthermore, the negative Beneish M-Score of -2.55 suggests low probability of earnings manipulation, reinforcing confidence in the reported financial trajectory despite revenue growth stagnating at just 1.6% year-over-year.

Valuation metrics present a compelling discrepancy between current market pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flow analysis. The stock trades at a P/E ratio of 11.7x, which appears compressed relative to its implied growth potential when weighed against a DCF fair value of $94; this suggests the market may be discounting future cash flows more aggressively than current fundamentals justify or that it is pricing in significant downside risk not fully captured by static multiples. The gap between the current trading price and the calculated fair value implies either an undervaluation opportunity based on conservative modeling assumptions or a premium to safety margins that requires confirmation through sustained earnings acceleration before the market re-rates the equity.

Risk assessment highlights a notable divergence between insider behavior and broader technical indicators, warranting cautious scrutiny of near-term sentiment. Despite the solid Piotroski score and low manipulation risk, the net selling activity by insiders totaling $622,720 over the last 90 days introduces a counter-narrative to the otherwise healthy balance sheet metrics. This insider outflow could signal management's expectation that current valuation levels do not fully reflect future operational headwinds or capital return constraints, adding a layer of skepticism to the bullish case derived solely from fundamental quality scores and DCF valuations.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$110$86$72
3%$125$94$76
4%$147$104$82

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $94 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
3.1
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.55
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

39.6%
Gross Margin
4.3%
Net Margin
10.0%
ROIC
+1.6%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+381.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
525.3M
Free Cash Flow
10%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

0.9%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
1.17x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
3.09x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
3.3%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

2.03x
Debt / Equity
1.60x
Current Ratio
20.95%
FCF Yield
662.8M
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
$-622,720
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
1
Sale Transactions
2026-03-25TILZER BRIAN A.Sold 1/8 qtrsSale$622,720
2026-03-24HILSON JOAN MSold 3/8 qtrsGrant16,936 shares
2026-03-24YOAKUM JULIEGrant4,013 shares
2026-03-24SYMANCYK JAMES KEVINGrant45,343 shares
2026-03-24CICCOLINI VINCENTSold 2/8 qtrsGrant2,375 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.04
Act: $1.18
+13.8%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.24
Act: $1.61
+29.7%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.29
Act: $0.63
+119.7%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $6.11
Act: $6.25
+2.2%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

6.8
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.71
Price/Book
942106
Avg Volume
$110.20
52W High
$49.99
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$151M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding SIG
0.06%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$253B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XRT or SLYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SIG shares regardless of SIG's individual fundamentals. We estimate $151M of passive capital is structurally linked to SIG through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on SIG's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in SIG to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

SIG Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
SIGEpicenterVYMETFVBRETFSPDWETFAMZNLow RiskTSLALow RiskHDLow RiskMCDLow RiskTJXLow Risk
SIG Price Drop (%)0

If SIG (SIG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with SIG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 11 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

SIG Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
SIG

Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

SIG Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does SIG convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$525M
EBITDA
$663M
FCF Conversion
79%
Reinvestment Rate
21%
79% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

SIG converts 79% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1313,270$80.35$1.1M
2026-05-082,049$87.99$180,291.51
2026-05-069,436$81.99$773,657.64
2026-05-0169$89.03$6,143.07
2026-04-298$87.09$696.72
2026-04-138$93.63$749.04
2026-04-109,959$93.06$926,784.54
2026-03-304,249$84.04$357,085.96
2026-03-2731$87.92$2,725.52
2026-03-2325,508$89.05$2.3M
2026-03-201,684$89.56$150,819.04
2026-03-19456$78.77$35,919.12
2026-03-181,080$84.96$91,756.8
2026-03-12144$85.48$12,309.12
2026-03-0511$95.70$1,052.7
2026-03-0416$97.13$1,554.08
2026-02-258,773$97.03$851,244.19
2026-02-20531$95.07$50,482.17
2026-02-1815,413$95.61$1.5M
2026-02-1348$89.35$4,288.8
2026-02-127,512$92.35$693,733.2
2026-02-0577$94.49$7,275.73
2026-02-049$91.23$821.07
2026-02-02380$92.27$35,062.6
2026-01-292,987$91.71$273,937.77
2026-01-23981$92.43$90,673.83
2026-01-211,186$93.44$110,819.84
2026-01-20562$95.16$53,479.92
2026-01-1411$88.41$972.51
2026-01-1311$86.13$947.43

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare SIG to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.