SPHR (SPHR)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 1.5.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics present a stark divergence between operational efficiency and financial stability. While the company demonstrates robust top-line expansion with revenue growing 18.8% year-over-year, supported by healthy gross margins of 51.6%, capital allocation is severely misaligned; an ROIC of just 2.9% against a WACC of 13.2% yields a negative spread of -10.3%, indicating that the firm destroys value on every dollar invested. This inefficiency is compounded by a precarious balance sheet profile, evidenced by an Altman Z-Score of 1.5, which suggests elevated bankruptcy risk despite a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a low Beneish M-Score of -2.83 that points to minimal earnings manipulation concerns.
Valuation metrics reflect extreme market optimism disconnected from the underlying capital efficiency. The current price-to-earnings ratio stands at 142.9x, implying that investors are pricing in perpetual high-growth trajectories and ignoring the drag on returns caused by the negative ROIC-WACC spread. A discounted cash flow analysis suggests a fair value of $50, highlighting a significant premium over intrinsic worth if current growth rates persist without substantial improvements in capital turnover or margin expansion to justify such multiples.
The risk-reward profile is skewed heavily toward downside potential due to the structural inability to generate returns above the cost of capital. Although the low Beneish score mitigates fears of accounting fraud, the combination of a distressed Z-Score and value-destructive investment decisions creates a fragile operating environment where even strong revenue growth fails to translate into shareholder wealth creation.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 11.2% | 13.2% | 15.2% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $58 | $46 | $38 |
| 3% | $64 | $50 | $40 |
| 4% | $71 | $54 | $43 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=13.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $50 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like SLYG or VOX, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SPHR shares regardless of SPHR's individual fundamentals. We estimate $101M of passive capital is structurally linked to SPHR through 7 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on SPHR's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in SPHR to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If SPHR (SPHR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Facebook Inc. Class A (META) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with SPHR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
SPHR Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest SPHR Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
SPHR Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does SPHR convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
SPHR converts 41% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 59% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-10.3%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 4,394 | $131.79 | $579,085.26 |
| 2026-05-05 | 1,695 | $136.46 | $231,299.7 |
| 2026-04-30 | 915 | $138.93 | $127,120.95 |
| 2026-04-29 | 2,600 | $133.00 | $345,800 |
| 2026-04-23 | 2,873 | $129.25 | $371,335.25 |
| 2026-04-20 | 11,259 | $135.67 | $1.5M |
| 2026-04-17 | 5,963 | $133.09 | $793,615.67 |
| 2026-04-16 | 3,321 | $132.41 | $439,733.61 |
| 2026-04-06 | 9,082 | $127.22 | $1.2M |
| 2026-04-02 | 782 | $119.81 | $93,691.42 |
| 2026-04-01 | 411 | $117.40 | $48,251.4 |
| 2026-03-24 | 198 | $111.20 | $22,017.6 |
| 2026-03-23 | 198 | $107.43 | $21,271.14 |
| 2026-02-27 | 1,832 | $116.32 | $213,098.24 |
| 2026-02-23 | 10,072 | $114.24 | $1.2M |
| 2026-02-13 | 116,498 | $115.72 | $13.5M |
| 2026-02-09 | 78 | $93.21 | $7,270.38 |
| 2026-02-06 | 17,834 | $88.41 | $1.6M |
| 2026-02-05 | 18,024 | $91.70 | $1.7M |
| 2026-02-04 | 17,485 | $95.00 | $1.7M |
| 2026-02-03 | 17,915 | $94.62 | $1.7M |
| 2026-01-23 | 1,850 | $98.38 | $182,003 |
| 2026-01-20 | 40,000 | $96.36 | $3.9M |
| 2026-01-14 | 80 | $97.87 | $7,829.6 |
| 2026-01-13 | 199 | $94.78 | $18,861.22 |
| 2026-01-12 | 199 | $95.26 | $18,956.74 |
| 2026-01-08 | 56 | $91.37 | $5,116.72 |
| 2026-01-06 | 51 | $93.43 | $4,764.93 |
| 2026-01-05 | 381 | $94.30 | $35,928.3 |
| 2025-12-30 | 195,500 | $93.19 | $18.2M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare SPHR to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.