STE (STE)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 5.0 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe underlying capital allocation efficiency presents a notable constraint, as the return on invested capital of 7.6% falls significantly short of the weighted average cost of capital at 10.6%, resulting in a negative spread that suggests value destruction despite robust profitability metrics. This dynamic is partially offset by strong operational leverage and earnings quality indicators; the Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and Beneish M-Score of -2.60 signal exceptional financial health with minimal earnings manipulation risk, while an Altman Z-Score of 5.0 confirms a low probability of distress. The DuPont decomposition reveals that equity returns are driven primarily by high net margins at 11.3% rather than asset turnover or leverage, which sits modestly at 1.53x times equity.
Valuation multiples reflect aggressive market expectations for future growth, with the current P/E ratio of 31.4x trading well above typical historical basements and sector averages given the moderate revenue expansion rate of just 6.2% year-over-year. A discounted cash flow analysis implies a fair value of $237 per share; however, this target is predicated on specific growth assumptions that may not materialize if operating leverage fails to improve or if margin compression occurs. The disparity between current pricing and DCF-derived values indicates the market is pricing in significantly higher future returns than currently realized fundamentals support.
Recent insider activity adds a layer of caution to the risk/reward profile, with $734,877 in net selling over the past 90 days suggesting internal stakeholders may be taking profits or reducing exposure ahead of anticipated volatility. While the balance sheet remains secure and earnings quality is high, the combination of negative ROIC-WACC spread and elevated valuation multiples creates a scenario where downside protection relies heavily on continued margin expansion rather than operational efficiency gains.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8.6% | 10.6% | 12.6% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $289 | $212 | $165 |
| 3% | $335 | $237 | $179 |
| 4% | $402 | $269 | $197 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.6%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $237 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XHE or SDY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell STE shares regardless of STE's individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.6B of passive capital is structurally linked to STE through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in STE to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If STE (STE) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies ELI LILLY + CO (LLY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with STE. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 23 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
STE Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest STE Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 23 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
STE Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does STE convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
STE converts 57% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-3.0%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 13,354 | $201.85 | $2.7M |
| 2026-05-07 | 527 | $214.46 | $113,020.42 |
| 2026-05-01 | 168 | $216.88 | $36,435.84 |
| 2026-03-25 | 10 | $221.73 | $2,217.3 |
| 2026-03-23 | 116 | $220.03 | $25,523.48 |
| 2026-02-17 | 19,304 | $248.35 | $4.8M |
| 2026-02-13 | 28,796 | $244.22 | $7.0M |
| 2026-02-03 | 398 | $264.24 | $105,167.52 |
| 2026-02-02 | 1,385 | $262.60 | $363,701 |
| 2026-01-27 | 57 | $263.13 | $14,998.41 |
| 2026-01-22 | 27 | $261.18 | $7,051.86 |
| 2026-01-14 | 181 | $259.87 | $47,036.47 |
| 2026-01-13 | 261 | $260.77 | $68,060.97 |
| 2026-01-09 | 114 | $260.68 | $29,717.52 |
| 2026-01-08 | 1,353 | $259.20 | $350,697.6 |
| 2026-01-06 | 44 | $256.75 | $11,297 |
| 2025-12-22 | 914 | $254.34 | $232,466.76 |
| 2025-12-17 | 73 | $253.03 | $18,471.19 |
| 2025-12-09 | 32 | $261.41 | $8,365.12 |
| 2025-11-24 | 5,146 | $263.29 | $1.4M |
| 2025-11-21 | 132 | $256.98 | $33,921.36 |
| 2025-11-13 | 156 | $267.99 | $41,806.44 |
| 2025-11-12 | 76 | $266.70 | $20,269.2 |
| 2025-11-10 | 2,493 | $263.77 | $657,578.61 |
| 2025-11-06 | 125 | $243.18 | $30,397.5 |
| 2025-11-04 | 11,776 | $237.32 | $2.8M |
| 2025-11-03 | 6,477 | $235.70 | $1.5M |
| 2025-10-27 | 622 | $240.76 | $149,752.72 |
| 2025-10-24 | 11 | $241.85 | $2,660.35 |
| 2025-10-15 | 73 | $237.81 | $17,360.13 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare STE to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.